If your vehicle in Antioch has undergone multiple repair visits and still shows persistent defects, a careful review of repair attempt documentation can determine whether you have a viable lemon law claim. This review gathers service records, warranty paperwork, and communication logs to build a factual timeline showing repeated failures to repair the same defect. In Antioch and across Contra Costa County, proper documentation often makes the difference between a strong claim and an unclear case, so gathering accurate dates, technician notes, and repair orders is essential when evaluating next steps toward a remedy under California law.
A repair attempt documentation review helps vehicle owners in Antioch understand whether their situation meets the threshold for legal action and what outcomes may be possible. During the review, key details such as the number of distinct repair attempts, descriptions of the defect, and manufacturer responses are examined. This process can reveal patterns that support a demand for repurchase, replacement, or other remedies, while also identifying gaps that might be remedied by additional evidence collection. The review is part investigation and part case preparation, aimed at clarifying strengths and weaknesses before formal negotiation or filing.
A thorough documentation review provides Antioch vehicle owners with a clear assessment of whether repeated repairs meet the criteria under California lemon law. This service brings together service invoices, warranty claims, and communications with the manufacturer to build an organized record. The review identifies missing entries, inconsistent descriptions, or patterns of recurring failures that support legal claims. By consolidating and analyzing raw records, the review helps clients decide whether to pursue informal settlement, arbitration, or a formal claim. It also clarifies likely remedies and timelines while reducing uncertainty about next steps.
Law Republic APC serves clients throughout California, including Antioch and Contra Costa County, handling lemon law and consumer vehicle matters alongside real estate and personal injury work. Our team focuses on meticulous record review to determine whether repeated repair attempts meet statutory standards under California law. We work directly with vehicle owners to collect repair invoices, dealer notes, and correspondence, then use that information to prepare demand letters or present evidence in arbitration. The approach emphasizes clear communication and practical advice tailored to each client’s situation, with attention to local procedures and timelines that affect Antioch residents.
A repair attempt documentation review examines all available records related to vehicle repairs and warranty service to determine whether the facts meet legal standards for relief. For Antioch vehicle owners, the review involves collecting invoices from dealerships, service center notes, warranty claim histories, and any written or electronic messages with the manufacturer. The process seeks to establish how many repair attempts were made for the same defect, whether the defect substantially impairs use or safety, and whether the manufacturer had reasonable opportunities to fix the issue. Organizing these records into a coherent timeline supports informed decisions about next steps.
During the review, attention is paid to details such as the exact descriptions of the problem, parts replaced, diagnostic codes, and the duration of out-of-service periods. For residents of Antioch, such details can influence whether a vehicle is categorized as a lemon under California law, which often requires showing repeated unsuccessful repair attempts or a significant impairment. The documentation review will also note any manufacturer denials or inconsistent responses that may be relevant in negotiations or arbitration. The goal is a clear, evidence-based picture of what happened and what remedies may be available.
A repair attempt documentation review is an organized assessment of all repair and warranty records related to a vehicle problem. It includes compiling service orders, repair receipts, parts invoices, and correspondence to create a chronological record of attempts to fix the same defect. For Antioch motorists, the review examines whether the same issue persisted after multiple authorized repair visits, whether the manufacturer was notified, and whether repairs were completed within reasonable timeframes. This process helps determine whether legal standards for remedies under California lemon law or warranty law might be met.
The documentation review process typically includes collecting all available service records, identifying recurring defect descriptions, verifying dates and durations of repair visits, and noting parts replaced or diagnostic conclusions. For Antioch residents, it also involves checking warranty coverage periods and any manufacturer communications. The reviewer organizes this information into a timeline and assesses whether the pattern of repairs suggests a substantial impairment. The compiled file becomes the basis for drafting demand letters, preparing evidence for arbitration, or advising on additional steps like obtaining expert inspection or supplemental documentation.
Understanding common terms helps Antioch vehicle owners follow the review process and communicate more effectively. Key entries include definitions of repair attempts, service records, warranty coverage, recall notices, and out-of-service periods. Clarifying these terms makes it easier to determine whether the repeated failures align with California’s standards for remedies. The glossary also explains commonly used phrases found on repair orders and manufacturer communications, so clients know what to look for when gathering documents. A shared vocabulary streamlines the review and reduces uncertainty when discussing potential claims.
A repair attempt refers to an authorized service visit during which a dealer or service center performed work to remedy a reported defect. In the context of an Antioch repair documentation review, each distinct service visit that addresses the same problem is counted to determine if repeated attempts occurred. Repair orders, diagnostic notes, and parts replacements are all examined to confirm the nature of each attempt. Establishing a pattern of unsuccessful repairs is often necessary to show that the manufacturer had multiple chances to correct a defect but did not resolve it to the owner’s satisfaction.
An out-of-service period denotes the amount of time a vehicle was unavailable for use due to repair work or waiting for parts. During a documentation review for an Antioch vehicle, calculating cumulative days out of service can help demonstrate the practical impact of recurring defects on the owner’s use of the vehicle. Records that show the vehicle’s arrival and release dates from a service center, along with notes on delays, can illustrate how frequently the issue interfered with normal transportation and whether the problem significantly reduced the vehicle’s value or utility.
Warranty coverage describes the terms under which the manufacturer agrees to repair or replace defective components during a defined period. A documentation review for Antioch drivers looks at the date of sale, warranty start and end dates, and what components are covered to determine if observed repairs fall within coverage. This review also checks whether repairs were performed under a manufacturer warranty claim and whether the manufacturer acknowledged responsibility. Understanding warranty scope is essential for deciding whether to pursue a legal remedy based on repair history.
Manufacturer response includes written or recorded communications from the vehicle maker addressing reported defects, repair completion, or warranty coverage decisions. In Antioch documentation reviews, such responses are important evidence of how the manufacturer addressed the problem and whether it accepted responsibility. Emails, denial letters, or settlement offers are reviewed to assess whether the manufacturer provided adequate remedies or refused to resolve the recurring defect. This context helps shape negotiation strategies or preparation for arbitration under California law.
When evaluating repair attempt documentation, vehicle owners in Antioch can choose between a limited review that focuses on core records and a comprehensive approach that gathers all related materials. A limited review may be faster and less expensive if the issue appears straightforward, concentrating on a few critical repair orders and warranty entries. A comprehensive review digs deeper, seeking additional correspondence, aftermarket service records, and extended timelines to build a stronger evidentiary picture. The decision depends on factors like the number of repairs, clarity of records, and the desired level of preparation before contacting the manufacturer or pursuing formal remedies.
A limited documentation review can be appropriate when repair records unambiguously show the same defect was addressed repeatedly and the repair orders provide consistent descriptions. For Antioch vehicle owners whose service history clearly documents multiple attempts with similar diagnostic notes, a focused review may suffice to prepare a demand letter or open settlement discussions with the manufacturer. This approach conserves time and resources while still producing the essential evidence needed to make a persuasive case that the defect persisted despite manufacturer repair attempts.
When a defect is straightforward and falls clearly within the warranty period, a limited review focusing on dates, basic repair details, and warranty claims may be adequate for Antioch owners. If service records confirm that repairs occurred while warranty coverage was active and the defect materially impaired use or safety, the core documents alone might support a claim. This targeted approach can yield quicker guidance about options without the expense of a deep dive into peripheral records that may not add substantial value to the core claim.
A comprehensive documentation review suits cases where repair histories are complex, incomplete, or contain inconsistent descriptions that the manufacturer may dispute. For Antioch vehicle owners, thorough investigation seeks out dealership notes, ancillary service receipts, and any communications that clarify the sequence of events. This level of review helps identify gaps that could be addressed by supplementary evidence such as technician statements or additional inspections, making it more likely to overcome manufacturer denials or procedural hurdles when pursuing remedies under California law.
When potential remedies involve significant monetary recovery or when a long dispute with the manufacturer is likely, a full documentation review is often prudent. For Antioch clients, assembling comprehensive records supports stronger negotiation positions and prepares the case for arbitration or litigation if necessary. Detailed documentation can reveal additional repair attempts, out-of-service days, or patterns of failure that strengthen the claim. Investing in this thorough preparation helps avoid surprises later and may improve the likelihood of achieving a favorable resolution.
A comprehensive review increases clarity and gives Antioch vehicle owners a complete picture of the repair history, including subtle patterns and otherwise overlooked records. By consolidating all service orders, warranty claims, and correspondence, this approach supports precise timelines and stronger evidentiary narratives. It tends to reduce uncertainty about case viability, strengthens negotiation leverage with the manufacturer, and provides a better foundation for arbitration if informal resolution fails. The thoroughness can also identify additional remedies or defects not initially apparent from a cursory review.
Comprehensive documentation work also helps reduce delays by anticipating requests for further evidence and addressing potential weaknesses before they become issues. For Antioch residents, this means fewer surprises during settlement talks or formal proceedings and a clearer estimate of likely outcomes. The assembled records make it easier to present a coherent case that tracks repair attempts, parts replacements, and communications, improving the prospects of achieving a favorable resolution without prolonged dispute over facts or missing information.
Having a thorough file of repair records and related correspondence gives Antioch clients stronger position when negotiating with manufacturers. Complete documentation reduces opportunities for the manufacturer to challenge the sequence of events or dispute whether repairs were timely and effective. A well-organized record helps highlight the extent of the problem, the number of attempts to resolve it, and the practical impact on the owner. This clarity often leads to more meaningful settlement discussions and can shorten the path to an acceptable remedy.
A comprehensive documentation review prepares Antioch vehicle owners for arbitration or other formal dispute resolution by assembling the factual record in advance. Detailed timelines, service orders, and communications reduce the need for rushed evidence collection later and increase the credibility of the claim. This preparedness can lead to more efficient hearings and can help focus attention on substantive issues instead of procedural gaps. When matter proceeds beyond negotiation, the assembled materials provide the backbone for presenting a clear, evidence-driven case.
Collecting every available service invoice and repair order is a key first step for an effective documentation review. For Antioch vehicle owners, this includes visits to dealerships, independent repair shops, and any mobile service records. Even small entries can reveal important patterns when combined into a timeline. Ask service providers for detailed descriptions, dates, and technician notes where possible. Retain digital copies and keep original receipts in a safe place so the review can proceed quickly and with minimal delay when preparing communication with the manufacturer.
Keep a personal record of when the vehicle was unavailable for use and the practical effects on daily life. Notes about missed work, alternate transportation costs, or safety concerns can supplement repair records to show the real-world impact of recurring defects. For Antioch vehicle owners, documenting out-of-service times alongside service orders strengthens the narrative that the defect substantially impaired the vehicle’s use. Include dates, durations, and brief descriptions of the inconvenience or expense incurred so the documentation review can incorporate a fuller picture of the consequences.
A documentation review helps vehicle owners determine whether recurring defects and repeated repairs may justify pursuing a remedy under California law. For Antioch residents, the review clarifies whether the pattern of repair attempts meets statutory or procedural thresholds, and identifies missing records that should be collected before negotiating with the manufacturer. The process also provides an early assessment of likely outcomes, including potential repurchase, replacement, or cash settlement. It reduces uncertainty and helps owners select the most appropriate path based on the evidence rather than on assumptions.
Another reason to pursue a documentation review is to avoid unnecessary escalation when records indicate the manufacturer has been responsive and repairs were appropriate. The review can reveal whether additional repairs might resolve the issue or whether a formal claim is warranted. For Antioch clients, this balanced perspective helps conserve time and expense by guiding choices between further service, negotiation, or formal action. The service also prepares owners for effective communication with dealers and manufacturers by presenting organized evidence and a clear timeline.
Owners typically seek a documentation review when the same safety or performance defect returns despite multiple authorized repairs, when the vehicle experiences extended periods out of service, or when manufacturer responses are inconsistent. For Antioch drivers, circumstances like repeated engine or transmission failures, persistent electrical problems, or unresolved safety-related issues commonly prompt a review. The service also applies when owners receive warranty denials or confusing repair records and need a clearer understanding of whether the facts support further action under California law.
When service records show multiple visits addressing the same problem without resolution, a documentation review can establish a pattern necessary for a lemon law claim. For Antioch vehicle owners, compiling these records clarifies how many attempts were made, what diagnoses were recorded, and whether the manufacturer had reasonable opportunities to repair the defect. The consolidated timeline helps demonstrate that the issue persisted despite repairs and can form the basis for negotiation or arbitration regarding an appropriate remedy.
If a recurring defect affects vehicle safety or substantially reduces performance, a documentation review helps quantify the severity and frequency. Antioch residents who experience intermittent braking problems, steering failures, or critical electrical faults should gather repair records to show the extent of the risk and the manufacturer’s response. Detailed documentation supports claims that the defect materially impaired the vehicle’s use and may strengthen demands for repurchase, replacement, or compensation under applicable law.
When a manufacturer denies warranty coverage or disputes the nature of repairs, a documentation review can identify inconsistencies and missing evidence that might change the outcome. For Antioch vehicle owners facing denials, organized records and a clear timeline help reveal whether the manufacturer’s position is supported by the facts. The review may also suggest additional steps to obtain corroborating evidence, such as independent inspections or follow-up service notes that clarify the repair history and strengthen a response to a denial.
Law Republic APC assists Antioch drivers by reviewing repair attempt documentation and advising on the most effective next steps. We work with clients to collect service records, correspondences, and other relevant materials, then evaluate whether the repair history supports pursuing remedies under California law. Our goal is to provide clear guidance on likely outcomes and practical strategies for settlement or formal claims. If you need help assembling records or want a professional assessment of your vehicle’s repair history, we can help you navigate the process and understand your options.
Law Republic APC offers focused support for vehicle owners who need thorough reviews of repair histories and warranty records. Serving Antioch and Contra Costa County, we combine careful document analysis with practical knowledge of California procedures to help clients determine whether a legal claim is viable. Our approach centers on organizing evidence, explaining findings in straightforward terms, and recommending realistic next steps. Clients benefit from responsive communication and a commitment to preparing a well-documented case that clearly presents the repair attempt timeline and relevant communications.
We aim to make the documentation review process efficient and accessible for Antioch residents by providing clear instructions on which records to collect and how to preserve critical evidence. Our review assesses service orders, warranty claims, and manufacturer responses to identify strengths and gaps. From there we advise on negotiation strategies, potential arbitration, or further evidence collection. Our goal is to prepare clients to pursue the best available remedy while minimizing unnecessary expense and confusion during the early stages of a potential claim.
Clients in Antioch receive practical guidance tailored to their situation, including expected timelines and likely outcomes based on the assembled records. We emphasize transparency about possible remedies and procedural steps, helping owners decide whether to request further repairs, seek settlement, or file a formal claim. Our role is to organize the documentation, clarify legal standards, and support clients through communications with manufacturers or neutral dispute resolution processes, always focused on achieving the most appropriate result for each individual case.
Our process begins with an intake conversation to understand the vehicle’s history and collect available service records and correspondence. For Antioch clients, we request repair invoices, warranty documentation, and any communications with dealers or the manufacturer. We then organize and analyze the records to create a clear timeline of repair attempts and identify missing evidence or inconsistencies. Based on that analysis, we advise on possible remedies, prepare demand letters if appropriate, and outline next steps including negotiation or formal dispute resolution when necessary.
The first step focuses on gathering all relevant records and documenting the client’s account of events. For Antioch vehicle owners, this involves collecting service invoices, repair orders, warranty papers, and any email or written correspondence with dealerships or manufacturers. We also ask clients to provide notes on the impact of the defect, including out-of-service periods and any related expenses. This foundation allows for a comprehensive analysis and ensures that the documentation review captures the full picture of repair attempts and manufacturer interactions.
Clients are advised to gather every repair invoice and service order, including those from independent shops and dealerships, as these documents form the backbone of the review. For Antioch owners, detailed invoices that list diagnostics, parts replaced, and labor provide important clues about the persistence and nature of the defect. We compile these records into a single file and verify dates and descriptions to build an accurate timeline that reflects each repair attempt and the progression of the problem.
Retaining emails, letters, and notes of phone calls with manufacturers or dealers helps establish what responses or offers were made. For Antioch clients, these communications can show whether the manufacturer acknowledged responsibility, denied coverage, or proposed remedies. We include correspondence in the review to demonstrate the manufacturer’s stance and to document any offers or refusals. This documentation supports negotiation or formal claims by showing how the manufacturer responded over time.
In the second step, we analyze the collected records to build a chronological timeline of repair attempts, noting recurring defect descriptions, parts replaced, and out-of-service intervals. For Antioch vehicle owners, this timeline highlights patterns that may indicate repeated failure to repair the same issue. The analysis includes checking warranty coverage dates and assessing whether repairs occurred within applicable periods. The resulting organized record serves as the evidentiary foundation for any demand, negotiation, or formal proceeding that may follow.
We look for recurring trouble descriptions, inconsistent diagnostic notes, and gaps in records that could affect the claim. For Antioch clients, identifying such patterns helps determine whether additional evidence or follow-up service might clarify the situation. The review seeks to reconcile variations in how the defect was recorded and to confirm whether repairs targeted the same root cause. Clarifying these issues strengthens the factual presentation of the case and helps anticipate manufacturer responses.
We assess how the defect affected the vehicle’s use, safety, and value while verifying whether repairs occurred under warranty coverage. For Antioch owners, demonstrating that repairs happened during the warranty period and that the defect substantially impaired the vehicle bolsters arguments for relief. The assessment includes tallying out-of-service days and reviewing repair outcomes to determine whether the factual record supports a request for repurchase, replacement, or compensation under applicable California statutes and procedures.
After completing the review and analysis, we provide a clear recommendation on the most effective next step, which may include sending a demand letter, initiating arbitration, or gathering further evidence. For Antioch clients, recommendations account for the strength of the documentation, the manufacturer’s prior responses, and the client’s goals. We explain potential timelines, likely outcomes, and any additional information that could improve the case, ensuring clients have the context needed to make an informed decision about pursuing a remedy.
If the documentation supports a claim, we prepare a demand letter that summarizes the repair history, highlights key evidence, and requests a specific remedy. For Antioch vehicle owners, a well-crafted demand can prompt settlement discussions or remedial offers from the manufacturer. The letter presents the organized timeline and cites relevant facts to make a persuasive case while preserving options for arbitration or further action if a satisfactory resolution is not reached through negotiation.
When negotiation does not yield a satisfactory outcome, the documentation review prepares the client for arbitration or other formal processes by presenting a complete evidentiary file. For Antioch residents, this means ensuring records are organized, key witnesses are identified, and any additional inspections or expert assessments that may be needed are arranged. That preparation helps narrow issues for hearing and supports a clear presentation of the repair attempt history to decision-makers in arbitration or court settings.
A repair attempt documentation review for an Antioch vehicle typically includes collecting and examining all available repair orders, service invoices, warranty claim records, and written or electronic communications with dealerships and manufacturers. The review compiles these items into a chronological timeline that shows when each attempt to repair the same defect occurred, which parts were replaced, and any diagnostic notes. This organized record helps determine whether the pattern of repairs meets the factual criteria for pursuing remedies under California law. The review may also include searching for recall notices, independent repair shop invoices, and out-of-service duration records to capture the full impact of the defect on the vehicle’s use. After compiling the documentation, the reviewer assesses warranty applicability, identifies inconsistencies, and recommends whether to pursue negotiation, arbitration, or additional evidence collection. The goal is to present a clear factual foundation for next steps.
California law does not rely on a single numeric threshold for all lemon law claims, and whether a claim is possible depends on the specific facts, the nature of the defect, and how many repair attempts were made. Generally, repeated unsuccessful repairs for the same substantial defect, or extended out-of-service periods for safety-related issues, are important factors. For Antioch vehicle owners, a documentation review examines the repair history and warranty coverage to assess whether the pattern of attempts supports a claim under state statutes. Because case details vary, the documentation review considers the severity of the problem, how often the vehicle returned for the same repair, and the manufacturer’s responses. The review’s purpose is to clarify whether the factual record aligns with legal standards and to recommend practical next steps, whether that means further repairs, negotiation, or formal dispute resolution.
Vehicle owners should gather complete service invoices, repair orders, parts receipts, and any warranty claim confirmations from dealerships or repair shops. For Antioch clients, it is helpful to include dates of service, descriptions of the reported problem and repairs performed, parts replaced, and technician notes when available. Also collect emails, letters, or text messages with the dealer or manufacturer that reference the issue or attempts at repair, since these communications can provide critical context about the manufacturer’s response. If independent shops performed repairs, include those invoices as well, because they may corroborate the persistent nature of the defect. Records of loaner vehicles, repair authorization forms, and any receipts for out-of-pocket expenses related to repairs or transportation are also useful. Providing a comprehensive set of documents enables a more accurate and persuasive documentation review.
A documentation review can be particularly helpful when a manufacturer denies warranty coverage by revealing whether denials are supported by the record or whether inconsistent or incomplete documentation contributed to the denial. For Antioch vehicle owners, organizing repair orders and correspondence may demonstrate that repairs occurred within the warranty period and that the manufacturer had multiple chances to remedy the defect. This organized evidence can be used to challenge a denial or to support further negotiation. The review may also identify missing records that, if obtained, could change the manufacturer’s position or strengthen a claim. In some cases, the documentation can prompt the manufacturer to re-evaluate its denial or to offer a settlement. When disputes persist, the assembled evidence provides the foundation for formal proceedings where the manufacturer’s denial can be examined in context.
The time required for a documentation review varies with the amount and accessibility of records. For Antioch clients who already have complete service invoices and correspondence, an initial review and timeline construction may be completed in a matter of days. When records are scattered or require requests from dealerships or third parties, the process can take longer as we obtain and verify additional documents. The complexity of the repair history and the need for supplementary evidence can also affect timing. We provide an estimated timeline after an initial intake and assessment of available records. Our goal is to proceed efficiently while ensuring the review is thorough enough to support meaningful recommendations about negotiation, arbitration, or additional investigation when needed.
A documentation review does not guarantee a settlement or repurchase because outcomes depend on the strength of the factual record, the manufacturer’s response, and procedural factors. For Antioch vehicle owners, the review clarifies whether the facts support a viable claim and identifies any additional evidence needed to strengthen the case. While a well-documented file increases the likelihood of meaningful negotiation and can lead to settlement, each case remains subject to factual and legal uncertainties. The value of the documentation review lies in providing a realistic assessment and an organized presentation of the repair history, which improves the chances of reaching a favorable resolution compared to proceeding without a clear evidentiary foundation. If settlement is not achievable, the same documentation prepares the case for arbitration or other formal proceedings.
A documentation review generally centers on records rather than requiring the vehicle to be brought to a specific facility. For Antioch clients, many reviews can be completed using the assembled service invoices, warranty records, and correspondence. If a physical inspection would provide additional necessary evidence, we can advise on arranging an independent inspection or reconnecting with a reputable local service facility in Contra Costa County to document current conditions and any remaining defects. When in-person inspections are recommended, we coordinate logistics and explain what the inspection should focus on to supplement the documentation. In many cases, the record review alone provides sufficient basis for making a recommendation about negotiation or formal steps, but we remain prepared to pursue inspections when they add meaningful value to the case.
If some service records are missing, the documentation review will identify gaps and propose ways to fill them, such as requesting copies from dealerships, obtaining statements from independent repair shops, or collecting related receipts and correspondence. For Antioch vehicle owners, we can assist in requesting records and documenting efforts to obtain missing materials, which can itself be relevant in demonstrating diligence. Incomplete records do not necessarily prevent a claim, but the review helps evaluate how the missing pieces affect overall case strength. When records cannot be recovered, the review may rely on corroborating evidence like client notes about repair dates, photos, witness statements, or communications that reference the repairs. These supplemental materials can mitigate missing documents and still contribute to a persuasive timeline when presented coherently alongside available records.
Out-of-service time is often relevant because it demonstrates the actual impact of the defect on the vehicle owner’s use of the vehicle. For Antioch residents, documenting the number of days the vehicle was unavailable due to repairs can help show that the defect materially impaired the vehicle’s value or usability. Service records that list arrival and release dates, combined with personal notes about transportation disruptions or expenses, strengthen the factual presentation of harm and support requests for appropriate remedies. The documentation review consolidates out-of-service information with repair histories to quantify the disruption and its frequency. This combined picture helps clarify whether the defect caused substantial impairment and can influence negotiation or the outcome of arbitration proceedings, making accurate recordkeeping of out-of-service periods an important part of the review.
To begin a repair attempt documentation review in Antioch, contact Law Republic APC for an initial intake to describe your vehicle’s history and to identify the records you already have. Gather service invoices, repair orders, warranty documents, and any communications with dealers or the manufacturer, then provide copies during the intake. If you need assistance obtaining records, we can advise on the most effective requests and help coordinate retrieval from service providers or dealerships. Once we receive the available records, we organize them into a timeline, analyze the pattern of repair attempts, and recommend next steps based on the findings. We explain likely remedies, potential timelines, and whether negotiation, arbitration, or further evidence collection is the best course. This structured process aims to provide clarity and practical guidance for Antioch vehicle owners pursuing resolution.
