If you purchased or leased an RV or motorhome that has persistent defects, you may have rights under California lemon law in South San Jose Hills. This guide explains how owners of recreational vehicles can seek remedies when serious mechanical issues, electrical failures, or warranty-covered malfunctions make the vehicle unsafe or unusable. It discusses the process for documenting problems, communicating with manufacturers or dealers, and pursuing a claim that could result in a replacement, buyback, or other remedies. Knowing your rights and next steps helps you protect your investment and travel plans.
Law Republic APC serves clients across California, including residents of South San Jose Hills, who face recurring RV or motorhome defects. Our office answers questions about warranty obligations, reasonable repair attempts, and the timeline required before a claim proceeds. We can outline options for informal resolution and, when necessary, formal claims under state law. If your recreational vehicle has ongoing safety or performance issues, learning how to preserve evidence and act promptly can make a major difference in the outcome of a lemon law matter in your city and county.
Pursuing a lemon law claim for an RV or motorhome can restore mobility, safety, and financial fairness for South San Jose Hills owners. When a vehicle repeatedly fails to meet warranty standards, owners face safety risks, costly repairs, and lost recreational time. A successful claim can result in a refund, replacement, or reimbursement for repairs and related expenses, reducing ongoing stress and financial burden. Taking action also sends a message to manufacturers and dealers that warranty commitments must be honored, which can prevent future buyers from facing the same problems in the local community.
Law Republic APC handles consumer vehicle matters including RV and motorhome lemon law claims across California and in South San Jose Hills. Our attorneys work to assess warranty coverage, compile repair history, and advise on avenues to pursue resolution with manufacturers or dealers. We prioritize clear communication with clients and practical strategies that preserve important evidence while seeking fair outcomes. For owners who need guidance on when to escalate a claim, we explain timelines, possible remedies, and the documentation that tends to strengthen a case under California law.
California provides protections for buyers and lessees of faulty vehicles, including certain RVs and motorhomes, when defects substantially impair use, value, or safety. Coverage usually depends on warranty terms, whether repairs were attempted within a reasonable number of tries, and whether the defect persisted despite manufacturer efforts. This area of law focuses on holding manufacturers accountable for warranty obligations and ensuring consumers receive either functioning vehicles or appropriate remedies. Owners in South San Jose Hills should document repair attempts, communications with dealers, and any safety incidents to support their claim.
Not every mechanical issue qualifies as a lemon law case, so it is important to review the warranty, the repair record, and the nature of the defect. Some problems may be resolved through the dealer or manufacturer without filing a formal claim, while persistent or safety-related defects often justify escalated action. The timeframes and specific rights can vary depending on whether the RV is new or used and the exact terms of the warranty. Residents of South San Jose Hills should gather repair invoices, service notes, and correspondence to determine the best path forward.
An RV or motorhome may be considered a lemon if it has a substantial defect covered by the manufacturer warranty that cannot be repaired within a reasonable number of attempts or if a defect presents a substantial safety concern. The defect must materially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety, and it must have occurred during the warranty period or within statutory limits. Owners should assess whether the problem is recurring and whether the dealer or manufacturer had adequate opportunity to fix it. Keeping thorough records of service visits and communications strengthens a claim.
Building an RV lemon law claim typically requires documenting the defect, tracking repair attempts, preserving service invoices, and notifying the manufacturer of ongoing issues. Owners should request written repair estimates and maintain correspondence with dealers and manufacturer customer service. In many cases, an early letter to the manufacturer outlining the defect and repair history can prompt resolution. If informal remedies fail, claims may proceed through administrative procedures or court actions seeking a replacement, refund, or compensation for repairs and related losses.
Understanding common terms used in lemon law discussions helps South San Jose Hills owners navigate the process more confidently. Terms include warranty coverage, reasonable repair attempts, substantial impairment, manufacturer buyback, and arbitration. Knowing how these concepts apply to your RV or motorhome allows you to evaluate whether to pursue an informal settlement or a formal claim. Keeping a clear timeline and glossary of terms for your case file reduces confusion when speaking with service personnel, manufacturer representatives, or legal advisors.
Warranty coverage refers to the manufacturer’s written promise to repair, replace, or otherwise remedy defects in a vehicle within a specified period or mileage. For RVs and motorhomes, warranty coverage may include structural components, drivetrain, electrical systems, and appliances installed by the manufacturer. It is important to review the written warranty to identify what parts are covered, the length of coverage, and any exclusions. Owners should retain warranty documents and note whether service work was completed under warranty to support potential claims.
Reasonable repair attempts are the number of times the dealer or manufacturer is given an opportunity to fix a defect before a claim qualifies as a lemon. While no fixed number applies in every situation, repeated unsuccessful repairs for the same defect or safety-related failures after multiple visits may meet this standard. Courts and statutes evaluate reasonableness based on the defect’s severity, repair complexity, and the number of repair visits. Documenting dates, work performed, and outcomes for each visit helps demonstrate reasonableness.
Substantial impairment means a defect that significantly reduces the vehicle’s use, value, or safety. For RVs and motorhomes, this could involve inoperable engines, persistent brake or steering problems, severe electrical failures, or recurring systems that affect habitability. The determination depends on how the defect interferes with the owner’s ability to use the vehicle for its intended recreational purposes. Evidence of lost trips, safety incidents, or diminished resale value helps establish substantial impairment.
Manufacturer buyback refers to the remedy where the maker repurchases the defective vehicle, often providing a refund minus a usage offset, or replaces it with a comparable model. Other remedies can include reimbursement for repairs, payment for related expenses like towing, or replacement of components. Remedies depend on statutory rules, warranty terms, and negotiation outcomes. Keeping detailed repair records and proof of expenses supports claims for reimbursement or buyback when a vehicle meets the criteria for a lemon under California law.
RV owners in South San Jose Hills can seek resolution through direct negotiation with dealers and manufacturers or pursue formal claims under state law. Informal approaches may be faster and less costly if the manufacturer agrees to repairs or replacement, but they require clear documentation and persistence. Formal claims, including arbitration or court proceedings, can secure legally enforceable remedies when informal efforts fail. Understanding the pros and cons of each path, including timing and evidence requirements, helps owners choose the approach aligned with their goals and the severity of the problem.
A limited approach may be appropriate when the RV has a single, non-safety-related defect that the dealer fixes promptly under warranty and the problem does not recur. In that situation, keeping detailed invoices and follow-up notes confirms the repair and clarifies that the issue was resolved. Owners should still monitor performance to ensure no related failures arise, and they should save all service records. This pathway can preserve time and money compared with formal claims, provided the vehicle returns to satisfactory condition.
When a manufacturer acknowledges the defect and proactively offers a full remedy, such as prompt replacement parts or reimbursement for documented repairs, an informal resolution may be sufficient. Owners should obtain such offers in writing and verify whether the proposed solution fully addresses the defect and related costs. Accepting a fair written offer can avoid lengthy procedures, but it is important to confirm that the remedy includes coverage for subsequent issues and that no future claims are waived without understanding the consequences.
A comprehensive lemon law claim becomes appropriate when defects persist after multiple documented repair attempts and they significantly impair the RV’s use or safety. In such cases, legal action may be necessary to compel a manufacturer to provide a buyback, replacement, or full reimbursement. Pursuing a formal claim also ensures that remedies account for incurred expenses, diminished value, and the inconvenience caused to the owner. Proper legal engagement helps ensure deadlines are met and evidence is presented effectively in support of the claim.
When defects create direct safety risks, such as brake system failures, steering problems, or major electrical fires, a comprehensive claim is often necessary to protect occupants and seek appropriate remedies. Safety-related failures justify faster escalation and thorough documentation, including any incident reports, repair orders, and expert assessments if available. Pursuing a formal claim sends a clear message to the manufacturer and aims to secure a resolution that removes the danger from the vehicle or compensates the owner for the loss of use and any damages suffered.
A comprehensive approach ensures that all aspects of the RV’s defect history, repair attempts, expenses, and impacts on the owner are documented and presented. This thorough preparation increases the chances of obtaining a meaningful remedy, whether through negotiation, arbitration, or court. It also helps capture indirect costs such as towing, lost travel plans, and diminished resale value. For South San Jose Hills owners, comprehensive preparation strengthens the case and supports fairer compensation for the full scope of harm caused by the defective vehicle.
Beyond financial recovery, a comprehensive claim can obtain corrective action that prevents similar defects from affecting other owners. Pursuing a full remedy can include detailed inspection reports and third-party assessments that demonstrate the pattern of failure. Properly framed claims are more likely to prompt manufacturers to change repair practices or address systemic issues. For individual owners, a comprehensive strategy offers clarity about timelines, expectations, and the likely outcomes so they can make informed choices about settlement versus continuing to litigate.
One key benefit of a comprehensive claim is the potential to recover out-of-pocket repair costs, towing fees, rental vehicle expenses, and other losses tied to the defective RV. Documented receipts, service invoices, and evidence of alternative transportation expenses support claims for reimbursement. A thorough claim will quantify these costs and present them as part of the remedy sought. Recovering such expenses reduces the financial burden placed on owners while the vehicle remains unreliable or unsafe for use in the South San Jose Hills area.
A comprehensive legal strategy increases the likelihood of achieving a manufacturer buyback or a replacement vehicle when defects cannot be resolved. Presenting a complete record of repair attempts, witness statements, and documentation of diminished value creates pressure for meaningful remedies. Such outcomes restore the owner’s ability to enjoy RV travel and protect financial interests. When an RV’s problems are persistent, securing a buyback or replacement provides closure and prevents further unreliable use of the vehicle in South San Jose Hills and beyond.
Keep a detailed file of all repair orders, invoices, and written correspondence with dealerships and manufacturers. Record dates, technician notes, mileage at each visit, and outcomes of repairs. Photographs or video of recurring problems can be valuable, especially for showing intermittent faults that technicians may not reproduce on demand. This record becomes essential evidence if you later pursue a formal lemon law claim. A clear paper trail demonstrates persistence of the defect and the manufacturer’s opportunity to remedy the problem.
If the defect has created safety concerns, document any incidents, near-misses, or emergency repairs. Keep medical or incident reports, tow records, and any police or inspection documentation. Also track canceled trips, lost rental costs, and other consequential losses to support claims for compensation beyond repair costs. Presenting comprehensive evidence of safety impacts and financial consequences strengthens your position when negotiating with a manufacturer or presenting a claim in arbitration or court.
If your RV or motorhome has repeated failures that affect safety, reliability, or value, pursuing a lemon law claim can provide remedies that informal repair attempts cannot. Owners who face ongoing outages, serious mechanical failures, or unresolved warranty disputes should consider formal action to receive appropriate compensation or replacement. A thoughtful approach helps determine whether the issue qualifies for statutory protection and whether pursuing a formal claim will likely improve the outcome compared with continued service visits alone.
Taking action also helps prevent further inconvenience and additional expense by prompting the manufacturer to address the defect responsibly. Whether the goal is reimbursement for repairs, a buyback, or a replacement, understanding the legal framework and your proof requirements increases the chance of success. Residents of South San Jose Hills benefit from knowing local repair resources, timelines, and how remedies are calculated under California regulations to make informed decisions about pursuing claims.
Typical circumstances include repeated engine or transmission failures, chronic electrical system malfunctions, persistent water intrusion, failing appliances or HVAC systems, and repeated safety system problems that the dealer cannot reliably fix. Owners might also encounter unresolved issues with chassis components installed by the manufacturer or major structural defects that affect habitability. When these problems persist during the warranty period despite multiple repair attempts, owners often consider formal remedies to recover costs or secure a buyback or replacement from the manufacturer.
Repeated engine, transmission, or drivetrain failures that continue after multiple service visits can render an RV unsafe or unusable and often form the basis of a lemon law claim. Owners should document each repair attempt, technician observations, and subsequent failures to establish a pattern. Evidence that shows the manufacturer had ample opportunity to fix the problem and that the defect persisted supports a claim for remedy. Persistent mechanical issues also increase the risk of roadside breakdowns and associated costs.
Chronic electrical problems that affect lights, power distribution, or onboard appliances can make an RV unfit for travel and living. When outlets, HVAC systems, refrigerators, or control modules fail repeatedly under warranty, owners face safety risks and disruption of travel plans. Keeping service records and proof of repeated calls or visits to the dealer strengthens a claim. Persistent electrical and appliance failures often require manufacturer attention beyond routine repairs to ensure reliability and safety for occupants.
Water intrusion, roof leaks, or structural defects that lead to mold, rot, or compromised habitability are serious issues for RV owners. When these problems recur despite repairs, they can substantially impair the vehicle’s value and safety. Documenting repair orders, photographs, and any rental or cleanup expenses supports claims for remediation or compensation. Structural problems are often complex and may require thorough inspection and persistent negotiation to resolve under warranty or through a formal claim.
Law Republic APC represents owners of RVs and motorhomes who face persistent defects or warranty disputes in South San Jose Hills and throughout California. We can review your repair history, help preserve crucial evidence, and explain whether your situation meets the criteria for a lemon law claim. Our office can also assist with drafting written notices to manufacturers, handling communications, and preparing claims for arbitration or court when informal resolution is not successful. Prompt action and organized records improve prospects for a favorable outcome.
Law Republic APC focuses on consumer protection for vehicle owners and brings a practical, client-centered approach to RV lemon law matters. We help clients understand their rights under California law, collect and organize repair documentation, and pursue remedies that reflect the full impact of the defect on safety and use. Our priority is clear communication, timely action, and protecting client interests throughout negotiation or formal proceedings for owners in South San Jose Hills and surrounding areas.
When you bring a claim, we work to preserve critical deadlines and ensure that notifications and evidence are presented effectively. We explain the likely timeline for informal resolution and the circumstances that may warrant arbitration or court. Our firm also assists in calculating recoverable damages, including repair costs, towing fees, and other expenses tied to the defective RV. This helps clients make informed decisions about settlement offers or proceeding to formal adjudication.
We aim to reduce stress for owners by handling interactions with manufacturers, compiling documentation, and clearly explaining options at each stage. For residents of South San Jose Hills, we tailor advice to local repair practices and typical warranty responses from manufacturers in the region. Our approach seeks to obtain fair remedies while minimizing inconvenience and ensuring that clients understand the consequences of any agreement before finalizing a resolution.
Our process begins with a thorough review of your warranty, repair records, and the nature of the defects. We outline whether informal negotiation is feasible and what evidence will support a stronger claim. If formal action is needed, we prepare written notices, file necessary pleadings or arbitration submissions, and present a complete record of the problem and its impacts. Throughout, we keep clients updated on timelines and settlement options so they can make informed decisions about pursuing remedies.
During intake, we collect all relevant documents including purchase or lease contracts, warranty paperwork, repair orders, and correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer. We ask clients to provide a timeline of repair visits and any evidence of safety incidents or lost travel plans. This stage focuses on creating a coherent narrative supported by records that demonstrates the defect’s persistence and the manufacturer’s opportunity to repair. Accurate documentation at this stage lays the groundwork for any subsequent claims.
We analyze warranty terms to identify covered components, exclusions, and the relevant time or mileage limits. Simultaneously, we review repair orders and technician notes to determine patterns of failure and whether the manufacturer had sufficient chance to remedy the defect. This evaluation determines the strength of a lemon law claim and helps identify additional documentation needs. Clear correspondence and properly formatted repair histories improve clarity when presenting the case to the manufacturer or an arbitrator.
Once records are assembled, we help clients preserve evidence and prepare formal written notices to the manufacturer describing the defect and the repair history. Notices may be required for certain dispute resolution programs and serve to document attempts at resolution. We also advise owners on preserving electronic communications, photos, and any third-party inspection reports that support the claim. Timely and thorough notices can prompt constructive responses or create a solid basis for escalation if needed.
Following documentation and notice, we engage the manufacturer or their representatives to negotiate a remedy. Many claims resolve through direct negotiation or arbitration programs that the manufacturer sponsors. During this phase we present the repair record, cost calculations, and impact evidence. If arbitration is required, we prepare the submission with attention to statutory standards and past analogous outcomes. Our goal is to obtain a fair resolution while avoiding unnecessary delay or expense for clients in South San Jose Hills.
In negotiation, we seek remedies such as reimbursement, buyback, or replacement by presenting a coherent record of failures and associated costs. Effective negotiation clarifies the legal risks and potential outcomes for the manufacturer, which often encourages reasonable settlements. We also evaluate settlement offers to ensure they address not only repair costs but any loss of use and related expenses. Clients receive clear explanations of offers and their implications before any agreement is accepted.
If negotiation does not yield an acceptable outcome, we prepare for arbitration or court by compiling a comprehensive case file that shows the defect’s persistence and the manufacturer’s failure to remedy it. This includes expert reports when helpful, repair histories, and evidence of financial losses. Preparation emphasizes meeting procedural deadlines and presenting persuasive factual narratives. Well-prepared submissions and oral presentations increase the likelihood of a favorable award or judgment for owners seeking full remedies.
When a resolution is reached, whether by settlement, arbitration award, or court judgment, we assist with implementing the remedy. This may include coordinating buyback logistics, ensuring reimbursement for documented expenses, or confirming replacement vehicle details. We also advise on any release language in settlement agreements to protect clients from unintended waivers. After resolution, we review whether additional claims remain or whether other remedies like reimbursement for diminished value are applicable and properly executed.
If a buyback or replacement is ordered, we ensure the calculation of any usage offset and refund is accurate and that required documentation transfers correctly. We review settlement paperwork to confirm it reflects the agreed terms and protects the client’s interests. Proper handling of registration, title transfer, and refund disbursement ensures a clean conclusion to the case. Clients receive guidance on the steps needed to finalize the transaction and protect their rights after the remedy is implemented.
After resolution, we advise clients on how settlement terms affect any remaining warranty claims and whether any conditions limit future remedies. Reviewing release clauses and warranty transfers ensures owners understand the long-term implications. We keep clients informed about documentation retention for tax purposes and resale considerations. Preserving records of the resolution helps if future issues arise and assists in maintaining proof of repaired defects and the remedies obtained under California law.
California lemon law can apply to certain RVs and motorhomes if they are covered by a manufacturer’s warranty and a defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, safety, or value. Eligibility depends on factors such as the nature of the defect, whether repairs were attempted during the warranty period, and whether the defect persisted after a reasonable number of repair attempts. Residents of South San Jose Hills should assemble their repair history and warranty documents to determine whether the vehicle meets statutory criteria. Local repair practices and the type of RV or motorhome can also influence the analysis. If your RV’s problems occurred within the warranty period and the manufacturer had a fair opportunity to repair the issue, pursuing a claim may be appropriate. It is important to document each repair visit, technician notes, and any communications with the dealer or manufacturer. Even if some repairs were done by third parties, detailed invoices and proof of expense can support a claim. Early consultation helps clarify whether informal resolution or a formal claim is the best next step.
Keep a comprehensive file that includes purchase or lease contracts, written warranty documents, repair orders, invoices, and all correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer. Note the dates of service visits, mileage at each visit, the specific complaints you reported, what the technicians did, and whether the problem was resolved. Photographs and videos of recurring problems can be very helpful, particularly for intermittent electrical or water intrusion issues that are difficult to reproduce. A clear chronology of events strengthens any later claim and helps demonstrate the persistence of defects. Also preserve receipts for towing, rental vehicles, and any out-of-pocket costs related to repairs and lost travel opportunities. If any safety incidents occurred, include police reports, incident reports, or medical documentation when relevant. Sending written notice to the manufacturer and keeping copies of that notice and delivery confirmation creates a record of your efforts to resolve the problem. Organized records improve chances of achieving a meaningful remedy either through negotiation or formal proceedings.
There is no single fixed number of repair attempts that applies to every RV lemon law case; reasonableness depends on the defect’s severity, safety implications, and whether the vehicle was returned repeatedly for the same problem. Courts and arbitration panels consider whether the manufacturer had adequate opportunity to fix the defect and whether repairs were substantially unsuccessful. Safety-related defects may require fewer repair attempts to justify escalation, while complex issues may warrant more attempts before a claim proceeds. Documenting each visit and showing that the same defect continued despite multiple repair efforts helps establish reasonableness. Keeping a timeline of service records, technician notes, and communications with the manufacturer shows that you gave the dealer or maker sufficient chance to remedy the problem. Consulting about the specifics of your repair history helps determine whether your case meets the standard to proceed under California law.
When an RV or motorhome qualifies as a lemon under California law, remedies can include a manufacturer buyback, a replacement vehicle of comparable value, reimbursement for repair costs, and compensation for related expenses such as towing or rental transportation. Buyback calculations typically account for a usage offset, and settlements may also address diminished value in certain circumstances. The specific remedy depends on the facts of the case, warranty terms, and negotiation or arbitration outcomes. Pursuing remedies requires careful documentation of repair costs, lost use, and any out-of-pocket expenses. Presenting a comprehensive record increases the likelihood of obtaining fair compensation or a suitable replacement. Legal representation can help ensure offers cover the full scope of the owner’s losses and that settlement paperwork accurately reflects the agreed terms and protections before finalizing any resolution.
You may be able to pursue a claim for a used RV or motorhome if a valid manufacturer warranty still covers the defects and the issues occurred within the warranty period or within applicable statutory timelines. Some warranties transfer with the vehicle, while others have limits or exclusions for used units. The eligibility assessment requires reviewing the warranty terms and the repair history to determine whether the manufacturer remains responsible for the defect under the coverage terms. If warranty coverage is unclear, documenting any remaining warranty period, transfer paperwork, and repair invoices is essential. Even when the vehicle is used, persistent defects that substantially impair use and occurred under warranty can give rise to remedies. Consulting early helps clarify whether the used RV meets legal thresholds and whether pursuing a claim is practical based on the repair record and likely remedies.
The length of a lemon law matter varies depending on whether the case resolves informally, proceeds to arbitration, or requires court proceedings. Informal negotiations can sometimes conclude in weeks or a few months when a manufacturer agrees to an acceptable remedy. Arbitration and court cases typically take longer, depending on scheduling, discovery needs, and whether expert evaluations are necessary. Preparing thorough documentation early helps streamline proceedings and may shorten the total time to resolution. Factors that extend timelines include complex technical issues, the need for independent inspections, and delays in obtaining repair records. Settlement negotiations can also take time if the manufacturer initially resists full remedies. Staying organized and responsive to information requests speeds up the process, and our office helps manage deadlines and communications to keep matters moving toward a conclusion while protecting your rights.
Not all RV lemon law claims require court. Many cases resolve through negotiation or arbitration programs that the manufacturer sponsors, which can be faster and less formal than litigation. Arbitration awards can be binding depending on the program used and the parties’ agreements. When arbitration is available, it often provides a focused forum to present repair records and expert opinions without the time and expense of full court litigation. If arbitration is not appropriate or fails to produce a fair remedy, filing a lawsuit may be necessary. Litigation can provide access to broader remedies and discovery tools but typically involves longer timelines and more formal procedures. Our approach is to evaluate the best forum for your situation and pursue the path most likely to secure a timely and fair outcome while considering the costs and expected benefits.
Yes, owners may recover towing, rental transportation, and other reasonable expenses related to the defective RV when those costs are properly documented and tied to warranty failures. Receipts, invoices, and proof that the expense was necessary because of the defect help establish eligibility for reimbursement. These out-of-pocket costs can be presented as part of a negotiated settlement or as damages in an arbitration or court proceeding when the manufacturer’s failures are proven. To support such claims, maintain receipts for towing, rental vehicles, storage, and any emergency repairs, along with documentation showing the connection to the underlying defect. Demonstrating that the expense was reasonable and unavoidable strengthens the claim. Presenting a clear accounting of these costs alongside repair records increases the chance of recovering full reimbursement in a successful resolution.
If a dealer refuses to document warranty repairs or disputes coverage, escalate by notifying the manufacturer in writing and requesting confirmation of warranty service and covered repairs. Maintain copies of all communications and send certified letters when appropriate. Documenting phone calls, names of representatives spoken to, and the content of conversations can help create a record. If the dealer is obstructive, manufacturers often intervene when presented with a clear repair timeline and evidence of unresolved defects. When documentation is missing, obtain duplicate invoices from the service center, request a written service summary, or pursue independent inspection reports to corroborate repair work. If necessary, include the lack of documentation and dealer obstruction in formal claims or arbitration submissions, since such behavior may undermine the dealer’s position and support the owner’s assertion that the defect was not adequately remedied.
To start a claim with Law Republic APC in South San Jose Hills, gather your purchase or lease paperwork, warranty documents, and repair records, and contact our office to arrange a case review. We will assess the repair history and advise whether informal resolution is likely or whether a formal claim should be prepared. During the initial consultation we explain potential remedies, documentation needs, and the usual timelines so you can decide how to proceed with full information. If you choose to move forward, we will assist in drafting written notices to the manufacturer, compiling the case file, and pursuing negotiation, arbitration, or litigation as appropriate. Our office coordinates evidence collection, communicates with the manufacturer on your behalf, and helps oversee implementation of any remedy obtained so you have clear, supported results for your RV lemon law matter.
