If you purchased or leased a new vehicle in Prunedale, California, and it has persistent defects that impair safety, reliability, or use, you may qualify for relief under California’s lemon law. At Law Republic APC we help vehicle owners in Monterey County understand their rights, what documentation matters, and how the lemon law process typically unfolds. This page explains common issues with new vehicles, the steps to preserve your claim, and how local conditions and dealer interactions in Prunedale can affect outcomes. Call 818-532-5323 for information about your situation and to discuss possible next steps for your vehicle.
Many Prunedale drivers assume frequent visits to the dealership mean their vehicle will be fixed eventually, but when problems recur or repairs fail to resolve major defects, owners are left with safety concerns and mounting frustration. Understanding the lemon law timeline, the types of defects that matter, and the evidence that supports a claim helps vehicle owners make informed decisions. This section outlines what to track during repairs, how dealer communications can influence your claim, and why timely action in California can preserve legal remedies available to consumers who bought or leased a defective new vehicle in Monterey County.
Pursuing a lemon law claim can result in a refund or a replacement vehicle, and may also recover incidental costs like towing, rental cars, and repair bills that relate to the defect. For Prunedale residents, a successful claim restores financial fairness for a purchase that did not meet reasonable expectations. Beyond recovery, filing a claim puts dealers and manufacturers on notice, potentially prompting wider remedies for other affected consumers. This legal path is designed to address repeated repair failures and dangerous malfunctions rather than isolated, one-time issues, and it serves to protect consumer rights for those who relied on a new vehicle’s promised performance.
Law Republic APC represents clients in Monterey County and throughout California in claims involving defective new vehicles. We assist owners and lessees from the initial evaluation through negotiation or court action, focusing on clear communication, careful documentation review, and local knowledge of dealer practices in Prunedale. Our approach emphasizes practical results and protecting client interests while navigating the lemon law process, including interactions with manufacturers and dispute resolution forums. Contacting the firm early helps ensure repair histories, service invoices, and correspondence are properly preserved for a stronger claim.
California’s lemon law covers many new vehicles that suffer from substantial defects that persist despite reasonable attempts at repair. For Prunedale owners, this means a pattern of repeated repairs for the same defect, safety issues that aren’t resolved, or vehicles that simply fail to perform as expected. Important factors include the number of repair attempts, the duration the vehicle is out of service, and the dealer’s and manufacturer’s responses. Knowing which facts matter for a claim helps owners track the right information and decide when to seek legal guidance to pursue a remedy under state law.
Not every vehicle problem qualifies as a lemon law case; isolated or minor defects that are repaired quickly typically do not. What matters in Prunedale and throughout California is whether the defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, safety, or value, and whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to fix it. Gathering documentation such as repair orders, service invoices, and correspondence with the dealer is essential. This documentation demonstrates the repair history and helps determine whether you should pursue a refund or replacement under lemon law procedures.
The California lemon law is intended to provide remedies when a new vehicle has a significant defect that continues after attempts at repair. In practical terms for Prunedale vehicle owners, the law evaluates whether the defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s safety, value, or use and whether the manufacturer had a reasonable number of opportunities to resolve it. Remedies may include a replacement vehicle or a repurchase. The law also addresses consumer protections for leased vehicles and may allow recovery of certain incidental costs. Proper documentation and timely action are key to pursuing these remedies successfully.
A typical lemon law matter involves compiling the vehicle’s repair history, evaluating whether the defect meets statutory criteria, and communicating with the manufacturer or dealer about remedy options. For Prunedale residents, expect to gather repair invoices, work orders, and any written communications about the vehicle’s problems. The process may include informal settlement attempts, arbitration with the manufacturer, or formal legal action if a settlement cannot be reached. Throughout, clear records of repairs, dates, and symptoms help establish the pattern of failure needed to pursue a favorable resolution for owners of defective new vehicles.
Understanding common terms makes it easier to navigate a lemon law claim. Terms such as ‘lemon law remedy’, ‘repurchase’, ‘replacement vehicle’, and ‘substantial impairment’ describe the remedies and standards used by California courts and manufacturers. For vehicle owners in Prunedale, knowing these definitions helps when reviewing settlement offers or manufacturer responses. This glossary provides plain-language descriptions to clarify what each term means for your claim, and how they affect possible outcomes and negotiations with the manufacturer or dealer.
Substantial impairment refers to a defect that meaningfully affects the vehicle’s safety, value, or use. In a Prunedale lemon law claim, this could include recurring brake failures, persistent engine issues, or electrical problems that make the vehicle unreliable. The assessment focuses on how the defect impacts everyday operation rather than minor inconveniences. Documentation that shows repeated repair attempts and lasting symptoms helps show substantial impairment. This term guides whether the law’s remedies, such as repurchase or replacement, are appropriate for a defective new vehicle.
Manufacturer repurchase means the vehicle manufacturer buys back the defective vehicle from the owner, typically refunding the purchase price minus a reasonable allowance for use. For Prunedale vehicle owners, repurchase often includes compensation for registration, sales tax, and certain incidental costs related to the defect. The amount refunded is calculated according to state law formulas, which consider mileage and use. This remedy can be preferable when repeated repairs fail to resolve major defects and the owner no longer trusts the vehicle’s reliability or safety.
A replacement vehicle remedy involves the manufacturer providing a comparable vehicle to the owner in place of the defective one. For residents of Prunedale, this option may be appropriate when the defect significantly reduces confidence in the vehicle’s performance but the owner prefers a like-for-like replacement. The replacement should be of comparable value and features, and adjustments may be made for differences in model year or equipment. This remedy is meant to restore the owner to the position they expected when they purchased the new vehicle.
Arbitration is a dispute resolution process that many manufacturers offer as an alternative to court. For Prunedale owners, arbitration can be a quicker path to resolution but may require accepting the arbitrator’s decision. Informal resolution attempts typically involve negotiation with the dealer or manufacturer to reach a settlement without formal proceedings. Both paths involve reviewing the repair history and negotiating remedies, and both require clear documentation of failures and repair attempts. Deciding which route to take depends on the specifics of the case and the owner’s goals.
Vehicle owners in Prunedale face a range of options when dealing with a defective new vehicle: negotiating with the manufacturer, submitting to arbitration, or pursuing court action. Negotiation may yield a faster settlement but could result in less favorable terms. Arbitration is a structured forum that can produce binding decisions, while court action offers the potential for broader remedies and judicial oversight. Each path involves tradeoffs in time, cost, and outcome predictability. Understanding these differences helps owners choose an approach that aligns with their priorities, whether that is speed, completeness of remedy, or clear legal precedent.
Some defects respond to a small number of repair attempts and do not recur, making informal negotiation with a dealer or manufacturer a reasonable first step for Prunedale owners. If repairs restore the vehicle’s performance and the manufacturer acknowledges the issue with a satisfactory written resolution, pursuing formal remedies may not be necessary. Keep careful records of diagnostics, repair work, and the dealer’s written communications. If the problem returns or remains unresolved, escalation to arbitration or legal action may be warranted, but initial limited approaches can be appropriate for isolated problems that the manufacturer promptly resolves.
When a manufacturer moves promptly to offer a fair repurchase, replacement, or reimbursement that reflects the vehicle’s value and covers incidental costs, informal resolution may be sufficient for Prunedale owners. A fair offer typically addresses purchase price, taxes, registration, and documented out-of-pocket expenses related to the defect. Before accepting any offer, review the proposed terms carefully and preserve all documentation. If the offer is transparent and compensates for the defect’s impact, accepting it can be an efficient way to resolve the matter without engaging in arbitration or litigation.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when repairs fail repeatedly and the defect raises safety concerns. For Prunedale vehicle owners experiencing chronic drivetrain, braking, or electrical malfunctions that continue after multiple repair attempts, a formal claim can secure stronger remedies. Comprehensive work includes compiling a thorough repair history, consulting on legal strategy, and pursuing arbitration or court remedies if negotiations stall. This approach aims to protect your rights, hold the manufacturer accountable, and seek a remedy that reflects the real impact of a defective new vehicle.
When a manufacturer disputes liability, provides inadequate settlement offers, or the legal issues are complex, a comprehensive approach provides structured advocacy for your claim. Prunedale owners may face pushback about whether a defect meets statutory standards or whether sufficient repair attempts occurred. Comprehensive legal efforts include preparing persuasive documentation, engaging in formal dispute resolution, and presenting evidence in arbitration or court if needed. This process helps ensure your claim is evaluated on its merits and that you have a clear path toward an appropriate remedy.
A comprehensive approach increases the likelihood of receiving full remedies available under California law, including refund or replacement and reimbursement for reasonable incidental costs. For Prunedale residents, it also provides a structured timeline and accountability from manufacturers and dealers, which can be especially important when handling persistent defects affecting safety or vehicle performance. Comprehensive representation ensures repair histories and communications are compiled professionally, which strengthens negotiation positions and supports favorable determinations in arbitration or court when informal resolution is not achievable.
Beyond monetary remedies, a comprehensive approach can relieve owners of the burden of dealing with repeated repairs, reduce uncertainty about vehicle reliability, and address ongoing safety concerns. Thorough preparation often results in clearer settlement terms that cover taxes, registration, and documented out-of-pocket expenses tied to the defect. In addition, pursuing formal remedies may prevent future buyers from facing the same problems by holding manufacturers accountable. For many Prunedale vehicle owners, the long-term peace of mind and stronger resolution justify a complete legal approach.
A comprehensive approach emphasizes collecting a thorough paper trail: repair orders, invoices, diagnostic notes, and correspondence with the dealer. For Prunedale clients, these documents translate into a clear narrative of the vehicle’s problems and the manufacturer’s responses. Well-organized evidence improves the chances of a favorable settlement or award in arbitration or court by demonstrating the pattern of failure and the impact on vehicle use and safety. This level of preparation helps ensure any remedy accurately reflects the scope of the defect and the owner’s losses.
Comprehensive representation often produces improved settlement negotiations because it signals that a claim is well-supported and ready for formal dispute resolution if necessary. For vehicle owners in Prunedale, this means manufacturers are more likely to offer fair repurchase or replacement terms and to include reimbursement for related costs. Focused negotiations streamline communication, reduce delays, and increase the likelihood of resolving the claim without prolonged litigation. The goal is to obtain a resolution that restores the owner’s position as closely as possible to what they reasonably expected from their new vehicle purchase.
Keep all repair orders, invoices, and written communications with the dealer or manufacturer in a single file. Notes about phone conversations, dates, technician descriptions, and repair durations are valuable when reconstructing the vehicle’s repair history. For Prunedale owners, service records from local dealerships and any diagnostic summaries help demonstrate repeated attempts to fix the same problem. This documentation strengthens any claim and provides the factual basis for settlement discussions, arbitration hearings, or court proceedings if formal remedies become necessary.
Acting promptly preserves rights under California law because delay can complicate evidence collection and may affect the manufacturer’s willingness to offer a timely remedy. For residents of Prunedale and Monterey County, early contact with a firm familiar with lemon law claims can help ensure repair histories are preserved and that appropriate next steps are taken. Prompt action improves the chance of a favorable outcome by ensuring the pattern of defects is fully documented and by allowing potential remedies to be pursued while the vehicle’s condition and repair records remain clear.
If a new vehicle repeatedly fails to perform, presents safety risks, or requires frequent repairs, a lemon law claim can obtain a remedy that addresses those losses. For Prunedale residents, pursuing a claim can lead to a replacement or repurchase and to reimbursement for certain costs tied to the defect. The law exists to protect consumers who purchased new vehicles expecting reliable operation. Considering a claim sooner rather than later helps ensure repair histories and communications are preserved so that any remedy accurately reflects the vehicle’s condition and the owner’s expenses.
Beyond immediate remedies, filing a claim can spare owners ongoing stress from repeated repair attempts and reduce future safety concerns connected to unresolved defects. A successful claim may also recover reasonable out-of-pocket expenses such as rental car costs or towing when those costs relate directly to the defect. For those in Prunedale and Monterey County, pursuing a claim provides a path to financial recovery and to restoring confidence in the vehicle fleet. Evaluating your specific situation against statutory standards helps determine whether filing a claim is the appropriate next step.
Several common circumstances prompt lemon law claims: recurring drivetrain failures, persistent transmission problems, unresolved electrical malfunctions, repeated brake or steering issues, or defects that create ongoing safety risks. Prunedale vehicle owners who experience multiple repair attempts for the same issue, who spend extended time without use of the vehicle, or who face ongoing reliability concerns often seek legal remedies. Documenting the symptoms, repair dates, and communications with dealers helps determine whether the situation meets the legal criteria for a lemon law remedy in California.
When a vehicle returns to the dealer multiple times for the same issue without a lasting fix, it indicates a pattern that may qualify for a lemon law remedy. For Prunedale owners, tracking each repair visit, the diagnostic findings, and whether the defect persisted after service strengthens a claim. Repeated repairs for items that affect safety or vehicle operation are the kind of evidence that manufacturers and dispute resolution forums evaluate when deciding on repurchase or replacement. Accurate, chronological records are essential to show the scope and recurrence of the issue.
If your new vehicle spends significant time in the shop due to repeated repairs, that absence from use supports a lemon law claim. Prunedale drivers who rely on their vehicles for work and daily life may find extended downtime particularly burdensome and costly. Documenting the dates the vehicle was unavailable, repair durations, rental car expenses, and related costs helps show the real impact of the defect. This evidence can influence settlement calculations and the remedies available under California law.
Safety-related defects such as steering, braking, or engine failures that persist after repair attempts are compelling grounds for a lemon law claim. For Prunedale residents, unresolved safety issues create immediate risks and justify seeking stronger remedies. Demonstrating that defects affect the vehicle’s safe use, supported by repair records and any safety recalls or advisories, strengthens a case. Manufacturers are expected to address defects that compromise safety, and the law provides mechanisms to secure remedies when repairs do not resolve those problems.
Law Republic APC is available to review the facts of your defective new vehicle claim, explain your rights under California law, and advise on documentation and next steps. For Prunedale residents, an initial evaluation can clarify whether your situation likely meets lemon law standards and identify the most effective path forward. We encourage vehicle owners to preserve repair records and correspondence and to reach out early. Call 818-532-5323 to discuss your case and learn how to proceed toward a possible refund, replacement, or reimbursement for related expenses.
Law Republic APC focuses on consumer representation in cases involving defective new vehicles and lemon law claims in California, including Monterey County. We guide clients through evidence collection, communication with manufacturers, and negotiation processes. For Prunedale vehicle owners, having a dedicated advocate helps ensure repair histories and correspondence are organized and leveraged effectively. Our approach seeks practical resolutions that restore a fair outcome for the owner, whether through repurchase, replacement, or reimbursement for documented costs associated with the defect.
When manufacturers offer inadequate settlement terms or disputes arise about repair adequacy, a structured approach to pursuing remedies can be valuable. For residents of Prunedale, we assess the repair record, advise on settlement offers, and prepare to represent clients in arbitration or court when necessary. Clear, timely communication with clients and careful preparation of evidence are key priorities so decisions are informed and aligned with the client’s objectives. We aim to resolve claims efficiently while protecting client interests throughout the process.
We encourage prospective clients to gather all relevant documentation before an initial consultation, including service records, purchase contracts, and correspondence with dealers or manufacturers. For Prunedale vehicle owners, having a consolidated file speeds evaluation and helps identify whether the case meets California lemon law standards. Contacting the firm early helps preserve important evidence and gives the best chance at a favorable outcome. Call 818-532-5323 to arrange a consultation and discuss your options for addressing a defective new vehicle.
Our process begins with a detailed review of your repair history, purchase or lease documents, and any communications with the dealer or manufacturer. For Prunedale clients we determine whether the defect meets lemon law criteria and outline reasonable next steps, which may include negotiation, manufacturer arbitration, or filing a claim in court. Throughout the process we keep clients informed about timelines, evidence needs, and potential outcomes. The goal is to pursue a remedy that addresses the vehicle’s defects and compensates for reasonable costs tied to the problem.
The initial phase focuses on evaluating the vehicle’s history and assembling the evidence needed to substantiate a lemon law claim. For Prunedale owners this means collecting repair orders, invoices, the purchase agreement, warranty documents, and any written correspondence. We review the sequence of repairs, how long the vehicle was out of service, and whether safety-related defects are present. This evaluation helps determine the strength of the claim and the remedies most likely available under California law, while also identifying any gaps in documentation that should be filled.
We analyze each repair visit to identify patterns of recurring problems, whether the repairs targeted the same defect, and if the manufacturer had a reasonable number of attempts to correct the issue. For Prunedale clients, organizing these records chronologically demonstrates the persistence and impact of the defect. This careful review forms the foundation for settlement negotiations, manufacturer submissions, or formal actions and helps quantify incidental expenses that may be recoverable under the law.
After reviewing your records, we assess whether the vehicle’s condition meets California’s criteria for lemon law relief and identify the potential remedies, such as repurchase or replacement. For Prunedale vehicle owners, this stage includes estimating recoverable costs and discussing how the process typically unfolds. We explain the likely timelines and options, including informal negotiation, arbitration, or court action, so you can make informed decisions about how to proceed and what outcomes to expect.
We engage the manufacturer or its representatives to seek a fair resolution through negotiation or the manufacturer’s arbitration program when appropriate. For Prunedale clients this involves presenting the compiled repair history, evidence of repeated failures, and a clear statement of desired remedies. Negotiations aim to reach an agreement that fairly compensates for the defective vehicle and related expenses. If informal talks do not produce a satisfactory outcome, arbitration or formal proceedings may be pursued to secure an enforceable remedy for the owner.
We prepare a written demand summarizing the defects, repair attempts, and the relief sought, supported by organized documentation. For Prunedale owners this demand highlights safety issues, downtime, and related costs to justify repurchase or replacement. A clear presentation improves the likelihood of a reasonable settlement by making the case straightforward for manufacturer evaluators or arbitrators. The goal is to secure a prompt and fair resolution while preserving the option of formal dispute resolution if necessary.
If negotiation is unsuccessful, we can pursue the manufacturer’s arbitration program or prepare for an independent arbitration forum based on the circumstances of the case. For Prunedale clients this step can be an efficient way to obtain an enforceable decision without prolonged court proceedings. Arbitration involves presenting evidence and testimony to a neutral decision-maker and can result in a binding remedy. We advise clients about arbitration rules, likely timelines, and what evidence will be most persuasive in securing a favorable outcome.
When arbitration or negotiations do not produce acceptable results, litigation may be the remaining option to pursue a full remedy. For Prunedale vehicle owners we prepare pleadings, collect expert reports if needed, and litigate the case in a courtroom setting. Litigation can lead to a judicial order for repurchase, replacement, or other relief and may include recovery of certain attorneys’ fees where authorized by law. This path is pursued when necessary to secure a complete and just outcome for owners of defective new vehicles.
Filing a complaint formally initiates court proceedings and begins the discovery phase, where both sides exchange documents, take depositions, and gather additional evidence. For Prunedale clients this phase can uncover critical internal manufacturer records or additional repair data that clarifies the defect’s scope. Discovery helps build a comprehensive factual record to support claims for repurchase, replacement, and reimbursement. It also sets the stage for potential settlement discussions with a clearer understanding of each side’s position.
If a case proceeds to trial, evidence is presented before a judge or jury who determines whether the vehicle qualifies as a lemon under California law and what remedy applies. For Prunedale owners, a favorable judgment may order repurchase, replacement, or reimbursement of certain costs. After judgment, enforcement mechanisms ensure the manufacturer complies with the court’s order. The litigation route is pursued to obtain final resolution when other dispute resolution methods are insufficient to secure fair compensation for the defective new vehicle.
California’s lemon law covers new vehicles that have a substantial defect that impairs use, value, or safety and that persist after a reasonable number of repair attempts by the dealer or manufacturer. The law evaluates the pattern of repair attempts, how long the vehicle was out of service, and whether the defect materially affects consumption of the vehicle. For Prunedale owners, maintaining a clear record of repairs and symptoms helps show whether the defect meets statutory standards. If the vehicle meets the criteria, remedies may include a repurchase or replacement and reimbursement for certain incidental costs. The specifics depend on the repair history, mileage, and how the manufacturer addresses the defect during repair attempts. Early documentation and timely evaluation support a stronger claim under California law.
Statutes of limitation and deadlines can affect when you must bring a claim, and timing often depends on when the defect was discovered and how repair efforts progressed. For Prunedale vehicle owners, acting promptly to preserve repair orders, invoices, and correspondence is critical for evaluating whether a claim is timely under state law. Delays in seeking review can make it harder to reconstruct the repair history and to protect your legal rights. Consulting a firm early helps clarify applicable deadlines and ensures key documents are retained. While timelines vary by case, timely documentation and prompt evaluation improve the likelihood of pursuing a successful remedy and prevent complications that can arise from extended delays.
If a vehicle is determined to be a lemon in California, common remedies include a repurchase by the manufacturer or a comparable vehicle replacement. A repurchase typically refunds the purchase price with a deduction for usage based on mileage and may reimburse certain taxes, registration fees, and documented incidental expenses related to the defect. For Prunedale owners, these remedies aim to restore the financial position they had before purchasing the defective vehicle. In some cases, additional recoverable costs include towing, rental car expenses, and repair bills directly tied to the defect. The exact compensation depends on the repair history, settlement negotiations, or binding decisions in arbitration or court. Proper documentation is essential to substantiate these recoverable expenses.
Repair orders and service invoices form the backbone of a lemon law claim because they document the attempts to fix the defect, the dates involved, and what was repaired. For Prunedale owners, having complete records for each dealership visit makes it easier to show a pattern of failure and the manufacturer’s opportunity to correct the problem. If some documentation is missing, retained communications, receipts, and written notes about conversations can help fill gaps, but original repair orders are the most persuasive evidence. If you cannot locate every record, gather whatever you have and contact the dealer or service provider for copies. Early collection of these documents strengthens your ability to pursue an effective claim and to present a clear timeline of repair attempts and outcomes.
Repair records from independent mechanics can be admissible and useful if those repairs relate directly to the defect and were performed while the vehicle was under warranty or with dealership knowledge. For Prunedale owners, independent records may help corroborate persistent issues, especially if the dealer was unable to diagnose or resolve the defect. It is important that independent repairs are well documented and linked to the defect at issue to be persuasive in a claim. However, manufacturers sometimes contest independent repair bills, so documenting why the independent mechanic was used and how the repairs related to the same recurring problem helps. Whenever possible, use dealership records as the primary evidence and supplement with independent documentation when necessary.
Manufacturers often make settlement offers during negotiation or after reviewing a demand package. For Prunedale clients, a prompt, fair offer can resolve the matter without arbitration or litigation, particularly if the manufacturer acknowledges repeated failures or substantial impairment. Careful review of any offer is essential to ensure it accounts for purchase price adjustments, taxes, registration fees, and documented incidental costs. If an offer seems inadequate, further negotiation or arbitration may be required. A structured approach ensures offers are evaluated against what the law allows, and it helps determine whether acceptance is in your best interest or whether pursuing a stronger remedy is warranted through formal dispute resolution.
The timeline for resolving a lemon law claim varies. Simple negotiated settlements can conclude within weeks to a few months if the manufacturer responds quickly and the documentation is complete. For Prunedale owners, an efficient resolution often depends on the clarity of the repair history and how cooperative the manufacturer proves to be when assessing the claim. Arbitration or litigation takes longer and may require several months to over a year depending on discovery needs, hearing schedules, and court calendars. Preparing comprehensive evidence early helps streamline the process, and clear expectations about likely timelines support informed decisions about pursuing different dispute resolution options.
If the dealer indicates the vehicle is fixed but the problem returns, continue to document each incident and repair visit, including dates, technician notes, and the dealer’s responses. For Prunedale owners, repeating problems after a purported fix strengthens the argument that the defect is persistent and not resolved by ordinary repairs. This pattern of recurrence is central to demonstrating a lemon law claim under California standards. Preserve written receipts and request detailed repair descriptions from the dealer. If the defect persists after several repair attempts, consider seeking a legal evaluation to determine whether to escalate the matter to the manufacturer or pursue arbitration or court remedies to secure appropriate relief.
Leased vehicles can be covered by California’s lemon law, and lessees often have rights comparable to purchasers when a new vehicle has persistent defects. For Prunedale residents who lease, it is important to preserve lease agreements, repair orders, and correspondence to document attempts to remedy the defect. The remedies available may include replacement or repurchase arrangements structured to address lease obligations and protect the lessee from unfair liability for a defective vehicle. Lessees should review lease terms and coordinate with the lessor and the manufacturer when pursuing a claim. Legal guidance helps determine how best to protect lease obligations while seeking the appropriate remedy under the law, and can clarify whether the lessee or lessor should take the lead in negotiations.
To start a claim with Law Republic APC in Prunedale, gather your purchase or lease documents, repair orders, service invoices, and any written communications with the dealer or manufacturer. Contact the firm at 818-532-5323 to schedule an initial review. During that review we will evaluate the repair history, identify the documents needed, and advise on likely next steps and potential remedies available under California law. We recommend compiling a chronological folder of repair visits and related expenses before the consultation to speed the evaluation. Early contact helps preserve important evidence and allows us to advise on immediate steps that improve your ability to pursue a favorable outcome for a defective new vehicle claim.
