If you purchased a new vehicle in Auburn, California and it has repeated defects that impair safety, drivability, or value, you may have rights under California lemon law. Law Republic APC helps residents of Auburn and Placer County evaluate defective new vehicle claims and navigate the steps manufacturers require before a buyback or replacement. Our office can explain timelines, required repair records, and common outcomes so you know what to expect. We will also clarify your options for resolving disputes with manufacturers and dealer repair facilities while protecting your rights under state law.
Many vehicle owners in Auburn are surprised to learn how lemon law protections can apply to recent purchases. The law focuses on vehicles with substantial defects that remain after reasonable repair attempts. If your new car continues to malfunction despite trips to the dealer, documenting repairs and following notice requirements can be essential. Law Republic APC provides clear guidance about what documentation matters, how to pursue a claim, and what remedies may be available, including repurchase or replacement. We aim to give Auburn drivers practical steps to move forward and preserve legal options under California law.
Seeking legal guidance for a defective new vehicle claim protects your rights and helps you avoid expensive mistakes when dealing with manufacturers or dealers. In Auburn, drivers face unique concerns such as local repair facility availability and regional consumer practices. Proper representation ensures your vehicle’s repair history is documented, manufacturer communications are handled correctly, and deadlines are met. Legal support also strengthens your position when negotiating a buyback, replacement, or settlement, and can help you recover out-of-pocket costs, rental vehicle expenses, and other related losses that arise from a persistent defect.
Law Republic APC serves clients in Auburn and throughout California in lemon law, personal injury, and real estate matters. Our attorneys work to build clear, organized case files that document defects, repair attempts, and communications with manufacturers. We assist clients in compiling repair records, advising on the manufacturer’s inspection process, and pursuing remedies when informal negotiation fails. Our approach emphasizes clear communication with Auburn clients so they understand each stage of a claim, potential timelines, and practical steps they can take while their vehicle is under repair or inspection.
California lemon law protects consumers who purchase or lease new vehicles that exhibit substantial defects covered by the manufacturer’s warranty and that cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. For Auburn residents, the process typically begins with consistent reporting of problems to an authorized dealer and keeping detailed repair records. Eligibility often depends on the nature of the defect, how many repair attempts were made, and whether the defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, safety, or value. Knowing how to collect and present evidence is key to advancing a claim.
The lemon law process involves different players including the dealer, the manufacturer, and sometimes third-party mediators. In Auburn, local dealerships may handle repairs differently, so it is important to track every visit and the work performed. When repairs fail to correct a covered defect within a reasonable timeframe, the manufacturer may be required to repurchase or replace the vehicle. A clear understanding of statutory notices, warranty coverage, mileage and time limits, and potential remedies helps vehicle owners make informed decisions about when to negotiate and when to escalate the claim.
A defective new vehicle for lemon law purposes is one that suffers from a defect covered by the manufacturer’s warranty that substantially impairs its use, value, or safety, and that persists despite reasonable repair efforts. Covered defects can range from powertrain failures and braking problems to electrical malfunctions or persistent safety system issues. The law applies to a vehicle that has not been successfully repaired after a defined number of attempts or after a prolonged out-of-service period, and it focuses on the consumer’s practical experience with recurring problems that materially affect the vehicle.
Successful lemon law claims require documentation of the defect, demonstrable repair attempts, and proof that the problem affects the vehicle’s usability, safety, or value. Typical steps include notifying the dealer or manufacturer, preserving repair invoices, requesting escalation when repairs fail, and considering mediation or legal action if required. Auburn owners should track dates, mileage, the nature of complaints, and any diagnostic results provided by the dealer. Timely and organized records make it easier to show a pattern of unsuccessful repairs and to press for appropriate remedies under California statutes.
Understanding common terms helps Auburn vehicle owners follow the lemon law process and make informed decisions. This glossary covers words you will encounter when communicating with dealers, manufacturers, or legal counsel. Knowing definitions for warranty coverage, reasonable repair attempts, repurchase, replacement, and arbitration gives clarity to the timeline and the potential remedies. Accurate use of these terms when documenting events and discussing your case helps avoid misunderstanding and ensures that claim submissions are clear and legally useful.
Warranty coverage refers to the manufacturer’s written promises to repair or replace parts of the vehicle when certain defects arise during the warranty period. In a lemon law context, whether a defect is covered by the warranty determines if repairs are the manufacturer’s responsibility. Auburn consumers should review their new vehicle warranty to learn what components are included, any exclusions, and the duration of coverage. Repair attempts for defects covered by the warranty are typically the basis for pursuing a lemon law remedy if the problem persists despite reasonable efforts.
The repurchase or replacement remedy is a common outcome under California lemon law when a vehicle cannot be fixed after a reasonable number of attempts. Repurchase usually involves the manufacturer buying back the vehicle for a refund that accounts for an offset for use. Replacement may involve the manufacturer replacing the defective vehicle with a comparable new vehicle. Auburn vehicle owners should understand the calculations used for refunds, including deductions and reimbursement for fees and incidental costs, and how negotiations or legal proceedings can affect the final resolution.
Reasonable repair attempts describe the number and nature of dealer visits required before a vehicle is presumed to be a lemon. California law often looks at whether the manufacturer had sufficient opportunity to cure the defect, with specific thresholds that can depend on the defect and warranty terms. For Auburn owners, repair histories showing repeated visits for the same issue and unsuccessful corrections help establish that reasonable attempts were made. Maintaining thorough records of each visit, the dealer’s diagnosis, and any parts replaced is essential evidence.
Arbitration and dispute resolution are alternative paths to resolve lemon law claims without formal court litigation. Many manufacturers offer arbitration programs that can speed up decisions and provide a forum for resolving buyback or replacement requests. Auburn vehicle owners should review manufacturer arbitration terms and deadlines, and evaluate whether arbitration is appropriate for their situation. Legal counsel can advise on the advantages and disadvantages of arbitration compared with filing a civil claim, including considerations of timing, costs, and the scope of potential remedies.
When facing a defective new vehicle, Auburn owners may choose from informal negotiation with the manufacturer, manufacturer arbitration programs, or filing a civil claim in court. Informal negotiation can be faster but may not yield full remedies. Manufacturer arbitration may be quicker than court and sometimes required by warranty terms, but it can limit discovery and remedies. Litigation offers expanded discovery and court enforceable outcomes but can take longer. Deciding which path to follow depends on the vehicle’s impact, available evidence, timing, and the owner’s goals for resolution.
A limited approach may be appropriate when defects are minor, isolated, and readily corrected by the dealer with a single repair visit. If your Auburn vehicle experienced an occasional issue that the dealer successfully resolved and it has not returned, informal communication and keeping repair records may be enough. In such scenarios, pursuing formal action could be disproportionate to the underlying problem. Still, owners should monitor the vehicle and document any recurrence to preserve options should the defect resurface or worsen.
If a manufacturer responds to a complaint with a prompt and fair offer that addresses your losses, a limited approach focused on negotiation can be sensible. For Auburn owners, this might mean the manufacturer pays for repairs, covers rental expenses, or offers a refund that accurately reflects the vehicle’s condition. Accepting a reasonable settlement can avoid longer disputes, but it is important to confirm the offer fully compensates for repairs, downtime, and diminished value. Consulting counsel before accepting any settlement ensures your interests are protected.
A comprehensive legal approach is often necessary when a vehicle exhibits persistent safety defects or major mechanical failures that affect its use over time. Auburn drivers with repeated brake issues, stalling, or airbag faults that persist after multiple repairs should consider more robust legal action. Comprehensive handling includes detailed evidence gathering, warranty analysis, negotiation strategy, and potential litigation to pursue a repurchase or replacement. Strong documentation and a coordinated claim strategy improve the chances of achieving full relief for the consumer.
When a manufacturer refuses to provide adequate remedies or offers only partial compensation, a comprehensive approach becomes necessary to protect your rights. In Auburn, owners may face manufacturers that deny claims or delay resolution. Legal representation can press for inspection rights, engage in formal demand letters, and initiate arbitration or court proceedings if needed. A thorough approach addresses both the legal and factual aspects of the case and aims to secure a remedy that covers vehicle repurchase, replacement, or full compensation for losses and associated expenses.
Using a comprehensive legal strategy increases the likelihood of recovering full remedies and reduces the risk of settling for less than fair compensation. For Auburn vehicle owners, a coordinated approach means capturing all relevant repair history, preserving documentation, and pursuing all applicable remedies under California law. It also includes preparing for manufacturer defenses, counteroffers, and potential delays. Comprehensive handling seeks to maximize outcomes whether through settlement, arbitration, or court judgment while minimizing stress and avoiding procedural missteps that could harm the claim.
A detailed legal process also helps quantify damages that may not be obvious at first, such as rental car costs, towing, incidental expenses, and diminished resale value. law firm involvement aids in calculating refunds and offsets correctly and demanding reimbursement for fees and costs where allowed. For Auburn residents, this approach provides clearer timelines and consistent communication, so claimants understand the progress of their case and the realistic prospects for repurchase, replacement, or monetary compensation under applicable statutes.
A comprehensive approach emphasizes meticulous documentation of repair attempts, communications with the manufacturer, and any safety reports. This thorough record-keeping strengthens claims by showing patterns of failure and unsuccessful repair efforts. Auburn owners who accumulate clear repair invoices, detailed service notes, and dated correspondence present a more persuasive case to manufacturers or decision-makers. Strong documentation aids in negotiations, supports arbitration presentations, and bolsters court filings if litigation becomes necessary, improving the likelihood of a favorable resolution.
Strategic negotiation and consistent advocacy increase the odds of obtaining fair compensation or a true vehicle replacement. A comprehensive strategy helps ensure offers from manufacturers are evaluated against full legal remedies, and it positions Auburn owners to reject inadequate proposals. Skilled advocacy includes preparing persuasive demand letters, documenting legal arguments, and pursuing arbitration or litigation when necessary. This proactive posture also reduces the chance of unnecessary delay, pushing manufacturers toward timely and appropriate resolutions that reflect the impact of the defect on the consumer.
Document every interaction with the dealer and manufacturer, including dates, mileage, service invoices, and a brief description of the issue and repair performed. Auburn owners should retain copies of all work orders, diagnostic reports, and warranty paperwork. Clear records help establish a history of repair attempts and are central to demonstrating that the manufacturer had reasonable notice and opportunity to fix the defect. Organizing these documents chronologically makes it easier to present a persuasive claim and reduces the chance of missing critical evidence.
Review your warranty and any state deadlines that affect lemon law claims, such as time or mileage limits and arbitration windows. Understanding these constraints helps Auburn owners avoid missed opportunities to seek relief. Prompt action preserves legal options and ensures necessary notices are submitted within required periods. If you are unsure about applicable deadlines or warranty coverage language, seek guidance to interpret the terms and to determine whether the manufacturer’s actions or inaction affect your claim timeline.
If your new vehicle in Auburn repeatedly fails to perform as expected, pursuing lemon law remedies can restore value and safety. Professional help can clarify whether your situation meets statutory thresholds and whether continuing negotiation or escalation will better protect your interests. For many Auburn drivers, the inconvenience and expense associated with persistent defects justify seeking formal remedies. Assistance ensures accurate documentation, careful calculation of refunds or offsets, and representation when dealing with manufacturer claims representatives or arbitration panels.
Another reason to consider professional guidance is to reduce the stress of dealing with manufacturers and to avoid procedural pitfalls that can weaken a claim. Legal guidance helps assess repair histories, determine the best path forward, and pursue outcomes that cover both direct expenses and less obvious losses such as rental costs and lost time. For Auburn residents, having an advocate to manage negotiations and paperwork can produce faster, more complete resolutions than attempting to handle complex warranty disputes alone.
Auburn vehicle owners typically seek help when they experience repeated safety issues, persistent powertrain failures, ongoing electrical malfunctions, or unresolved emissions defects. Other common triggers include repeated engine stalls, steering or braking problems that recur after repair, and software or sensor issues that render safety systems unreliable. When these problems continue despite multiple dealer visits and repairs, drivers often turn to formal remedies to recover the value of their investment and address the risks posed by unresolved defects.
When critical safety systems such as brakes, airbags, or steering experience repeated failures or inconsistencies despite repairs, Auburn drivers should take prompt action. These issues pose immediate risks to personal safety and may justify escalation beyond routine repair attempts. Documenting each repair and any communications about safety recalls or diagnostic findings strengthens a claim. Seeking guidance early helps ensure that the manufacturer is given proper notice and that all remedies available under California law are pursued efficiently.
Engine misfires, stalling, transmission faults, or persistent powertrain defects that return after multiple repair attempts commonly prompt lemon law claims. For Auburn vehicle owners, these problems often lead to significant inconvenience, repair costs, and diminished resale value. Accurate documentation of service visits, repair orders, and diagnostic codes is essential. If a defect continues to affect the vehicle’s performance despite repeated repairs, legal remedies may include repurchase or replacement based on the impact of the defect and the repair history.
Modern vehicles rely heavily on electrical systems and software that control numerous functions, including safety systems and drivability features. Auburn drivers who experience recurring electrical faults, warning lights that cannot be resolved, or software glitches that impair the vehicle’s operation may need to pursue formal remedies. Because these issues can be intermittent or difficult to diagnose, maintaining a precise record of symptoms, dealer findings, and failed repairs helps establish a pattern of unresolved defects necessary for a successful claim.
Law Republic APC is available to review your defective vehicle situation and explain your options under California lemon law. We offer an initial assessment of repair records, communications, and warranty terms so you can understand potential remedies and next steps. Our goal is to provide clear guidance tailored to Auburn residents, including how to pursue a buyback, replacement, or other compensation when repairs have failed. Call our office at 818-532-5323 to discuss your case and learn more about the practical steps to move forward.
Law Republic APC focuses on protecting consumer rights in defective vehicle disputes and other areas such as personal injury and real estate. For Auburn clients, we prioritize building organized case files that demonstrate repeated repair attempts and the effect of defects on vehicle use. Our approach is to communicate clearly about the likely outcomes, settlement possibilities, and the processes involved in arbitration or litigation. We emphasize practical solutions that pursue full remedies while minimizing unnecessary delay and expense.
When assessing a defective new vehicle claim, our team helps clients gather essential evidence, draft demand communications, and evaluate manufacturer responses. We guide Auburn owners through warranty review, mediation options, and statutory remedies, and we help calculate appropriate refunds or offsets. Our role also includes coordinating with service facilities, managing timelines, and representing clients in arbitration or court when necessary to secure fair compensation or vehicle replacement under California law.
Clients in Auburn appreciate straightforward counsel and attention to detail when pursuing lemon law remedies. We work to keep you informed at every stage and to negotiate firmly with manufacturers to obtain equitable outcomes. Whether the case resolves through settlement, arbitration, or court proceedings, our objective is to preserve your rights, recover allowable costs, and pursue the remedy that best addresses the impact of the defect on your vehicle ownership experience.
Our legal process begins with a detailed review of your repair history, warranty documents, and communications with the dealer and manufacturer. For Auburn clients, we compile a chronological file of service records and assess whether the defect qualifies under California lemon law. We then advise on possible next steps including demand letters, arbitration participation, or filing a civil action. Throughout the process, we keep clients informed of options and coordinate any necessary inspections or expert opinions to support the claim.
The first step is gathering all relevant documentation including purchase agreements, warranty paperwork, repair invoices, service orders, and written communications with the dealer or manufacturer. For Auburn vehicle owners, this means collecting every record of visits to the dealership, mileage at each visit, and descriptions of complaints and repairs. This package forms the foundation of the claim and helps determine whether the vehicle meets statutory thresholds for a lemon law remedy.
We carefully review warranty terms to identify covered components and determine whether defects fall within that scope. Simultaneously, we analyze repair history to document the pattern of failed repairs. For Auburn clients, this analysis includes confirming dates, mileage, and the nature of defects reported to the dealer. A clear assessment of whether repairs were reasonable and whether the defect substantially impairs the vehicle guides the choice of next steps, including negotiation or formal action.
Preserving evidence means keeping original repair invoices, retaining correspondence, and creating a reliable timeline of events. We advise Auburn owners on how to organize these materials and how to create backups for digital records. Proper preservation prevents loss of critical information and prepares the file for potential arbitration or court proceedings. We also document any manufacturer offers or denials to ensure that the case file accurately reflects all attempts at resolution prior to escalation.
After compiling the file, we prepare a formal demand to the manufacturer outlining the defect history, repair attempts, and the relief sought. This demand seeks repurchase, replacement, or monetary compensation and provides the manufacturer an opportunity to resolve the claim. For Auburn clients, this stage often prompts the manufacturer to offer a settlement or to propose arbitration. Negotiation aims to achieve a fair, timely outcome while preserving the option to pursue arbitration or court action if necessary.
The demand package includes a chronological repair log, copies of invoices, warranty terms, and a statement of the defect’s impact on the vehicle. For Auburn owners, providing clear evidence of repeated failed repairs and the vehicle’s diminished value strengthens the case for repurchase or replacement. The package also outlines statutory arguments and legal remedies available under California law, making it more likely the manufacturer will engage in meaningful settlement discussions rather than deny the claim outright.
Negotiation involves exchanging settlement proposals and, if appropriate, involving mediators or neutral evaluators to facilitate a resolution. Our role includes evaluating manufacturer offers, advising Auburn clients on whether proposals are fair, and pushing for terms that cover refund calculations, fees, and incidental costs. If negotiations fail or the manufacturer insists on arbitration, we prepare the case for the next stage while keeping client interests front and center during all settlement discussions.
If negotiations and manufacturer responses do not yield a fair resolution, the next step may be arbitration or filing a civil claim. Arbitration can be quicker but may limit discovery; litigation provides broader remedies and discovery tools but typically requires more time. For Auburn cases, we evaluate which forum gives the strongest chance of achieving the client’s objectives and proceed accordingly, preparing thorough evidentiary presentations and representing clients in hearings or court proceedings as needed.
When arbitration is the chosen path, we prepare a focused presentation of the repair history, warranty coverage, and the legal basis for repurchase or replacement. This includes assembling exhibits, witness statements, and technical records that show the defect’s persistence. For Auburn clients, the goal in arbitration is to present a compelling and concise case that convinces the arbitrator the manufacturer failed to remedy a covered defect despite reasonable repair attempts, leading to an appropriate remedy.
If litigation is necessary, we utilize formal discovery, depositions, and expert testimony when appropriate to prove the defect and its impact. Litigation allows for comprehensive fact-finding, and in many cases it leads to settlements once the manufacturer recognizes the strength of the claim. For Auburn residents, pursuing court action is a deliberate decision that aims to secure full compensation or a repurchase when other avenues fail, and requires careful case management and adherence to procedural rules.
A vehicle generally qualifies under California lemon law if it has a defect covered by the manufacturer’s warranty that substantially impairs its use, value, or safety and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. Factors include the nature of the defect, whether multiple repair attempts have been made for the same issue, and whether the defect persisted within applicable warranty or statutory timelines. For Auburn residents, documenting the repair history and the defect’s ongoing impact helps determine eligibility and the best path forward. If you believe your vehicle may qualify, start by collecting all repair records and warranty documents, and seek an assessment of whether the defect meets statutory thresholds. Early evaluation helps preserve rights, ensures timely notifications are made if required, and informs the decision whether to pursue negotiation, arbitration, or litigation based on the strength of the evidence and the desired remedy.
Keep every service invoice, repair order, estimate, and any written communications with the dealer or manufacturer. Note the dates and mileage for each repair visit, and retain copies of purchase or lease agreements and the manufacturer warranty. For Auburn owners, this documentation forms the backbone of any lemon law claim and helps show a pattern of unsuccessful repair attempts. Photographs or videos of symptoms can also be useful when defects are visible or intermittent. In addition, preserve any correspondence related to manufacturer responses or offers, rental car receipts, towing invoices, and records of out-of-pocket costs. A clear, chronological file simplifies the process of preparing a demand package, arbitration submission, or court filing while increasing the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Many manufacturers include arbitration clauses in warranty agreements that encourage or require arbitration before pursuing court action. Arbitration can be faster and less formal than court, but it may restrict certain procedural tools and limit discovery. Auburn owners should review their warranty terms to determine whether arbitration is mandatory and whether any opt-out provisions apply. Some arbitration programs also offer a neutral evaluation that can lead to settlement without full arbitration proceedings. If arbitration is required, it remains important to prepare a robust case file, including repair histories and supporting documents, to present a persuasive argument. Legal guidance can help determine whether arbitration or litigation better serves the client’s goals, and can represent you throughout the arbitration process to protect your interests and press for appropriate remedies.
Common remedies under California lemon law include repurchase of the vehicle, replacement with a comparable new vehicle, or a cash settlement that compensates for diminished value and associated costs. Repurchase typically involves refunding the purchase price with an offset for use, and may include reimbursement for fees, taxes, and incidental expenses such as rental car costs. Replacement remedies involve delivering a comparable new vehicle and resolving any associated financial adjustments. The exact remedy depends on the facts of the case, the defect at issue, and the repair history. Some claims settle through negotiation or arbitration, while others proceed to court where remedies are awarded after a full evaluation of evidence. Consulting with counsel helps ensure that any proposed remedy properly accounts for the full extent of the claimant’s losses.
Resolution timelines vary widely depending on whether the case settles quickly through negotiation, goes to manufacturer arbitration, or requires litigation. Informal resolutions and manufacturer responses can sometimes occur within weeks or a few months, while arbitration or court proceedings commonly take longer. For Auburn clients, the complexity of the defect, the amount of documentation needed, and manufacturer responsiveness all influence the time to resolution. Preparing records and acting promptly can shorten the process. If litigation becomes necessary, expect a longer timeline due to formal discovery, motion practice, and potential trial scheduling. Even so, many cases settle during litigation once the strengths of the claims and defenses become apparent, so pursuing court action can be an effective way to secure a fair outcome when other avenues fail.
If the manufacturer repurchases your vehicle, the refund calculation typically deducts a reasonable offset for the consumer’s use of the vehicle. This offset accounts for mileage and vehicle depreciation since purchase. However, repurchase remedies often include reimbursement for taxes, registration fees, and certain incidental costs, and the net refund may be calculated to reflect these factors. For Auburn owners, understanding how the manufacturer calculates offsets and what expenses are reimbursable is important before accepting any settlement. Legal representation can review any repurchase offer to ensure the refund calculation is accurate and that allowable reimbursements are included. Disputes over offsets or omitted reimbursements can be addressed through further negotiation, arbitration, or litigation to seek a fair resolution under California law.
A claim may still be possible if the vehicle is outside the initial warranty period in certain circumstances, such as when defects were reported during the warranty period or if the manufacturer extends coverage or issues related recall. Additionally, non-warranty statutes or implied warranties can sometimes provide avenues for relief. For Auburn owners, timing and the nature of the defect affect available options, making a thorough review of repair history and warranty language essential to determine if a claim remains viable. Promptly compiling documentation and seeking legal advice can reveal whether statutory exceptions or other legal theories apply. Even if the initial warranty has expired, records showing repair attempts during the warranty period or evidence of hidden defects may support further pursuit of remedies through negotiation or litigation.
Recalls are manufacturer notices to address safety or emissions defects, and they can interact with lemon law claims. If a recall addresses your issue, the manufacturer’s obligation to perform a recall repair may affect the timing and available remedies under lemon law. In some cases, recall repairs can resolve a defect, while in others the problem persists despite recall-related fixes. Auburn owners should track recall notices and document any related repairs and outcomes. Recalls do not automatically prevent a lemon law claim, but they are relevant evidence about manufacturer knowledge and corrective actions. If a recall repair fails to resolve the defect, this history can strengthen a lemon law claim by demonstrating that manufacturer-initiated remedies were insufficient to correct the ongoing problem.
Whether to continue using your vehicle while pursuing a claim depends on the severity of the defect and safety considerations. If the defect poses safety risks, it is prudent to avoid driving the vehicle and to document the risk and any dealer advice. For less severe issues, continuing to use the vehicle while maintaining repair records is common, but owners should keep detailed logs of problems and visits to the dealer. Auburn drivers should prioritize safety and follow manufacturer or dealer guidance regarding vehicle use. Additionally, continuing to use the vehicle may affect refund calculations in a repurchase, so documenting mileage and the condition of the vehicle is important. Discussing the situation with legal counsel helps balance safety and preservation of claim rights while ensuring appropriate documentation is collected.
To discuss a defective new vehicle claim in Auburn, contact Law Republic APC by calling 818-532-5323 or using the contact form on our website. We will review your repair history and warranty documents and provide an assessment of possible next steps. Our goal is to explain the process, potential remedies, and the types of documentation that will strengthen your claim so you can decide whether to move forward with negotiation, arbitration, or litigation. During the initial consultation we focus on gathering the essential facts about the defect and repair attempts, advising on immediate preservation steps, and outlining realistic expectations for resolution. If you choose to proceed, we will help compile the required evidence and represent your interests in discussions with the manufacturer or in formal proceedings as needed.
