If you purchased a new vehicle that developed persistent defects, residents of Loomis have specific protections under California law. This page explains how the lemon law process works for defective new vehicles and what steps vehicle owners in Loomis should take to protect their rights. Law Republic APC handles lemon law matters across California and can help you evaluate whether your vehicle qualifies, how to preserve important documentation, and the potential remedies available such as replacement or buyback options. Contact information and local considerations for Loomis drivers are included to make it easier to get started.
Many Loomis vehicle owners do not realize that repeated repairs for the same defect may be evidence of a defective new vehicle claim under California law. This introduction outlines the typical timeline and documentation that supports a claim, including repair orders, correspondence with the manufacturer or dealer, and a record of symptoms and occurrences. Understanding these elements early can significantly influence the outcome. Law Republic APC focuses on guiding clients through intake, documentation review, and communications with manufacturers while explaining local factors relevant to Loomis and Placer County.
Pursuing a lemon law claim protects your financial investment and safety when a new vehicle continues to malfunction despite repeated repairs. For Loomis residents, resolving a defective new vehicle case can result in a manufacturer buyback, replacement vehicle, or monetary compensation for repairs and related costs. The process also holds manufacturers and dealers accountable for warranty obligations and can prevent continued exposure to unsafe vehicle conditions. Taking action early helps preserve evidence and enhances the likelihood of a favorable outcome, while providing peace of mind that legal options are available to resolve ongoing vehicle issues.
Law Republic APC provides representation to clients across California including Loomis, focusing on consumer protections for defective new vehicles. The firm assists with case evaluation, negotiating with manufacturers, and pursuing formal remedies under the lemon law. Our approach centers on careful review of repair histories, clear communication with manufacturers, and assertive negotiation while keeping clients informed about local considerations in Placer County. We prioritize practical solutions that aim to secure replacement vehicles or fair compensation while minimizing additional stress for vehicle owners navigating warranty disputes.
A lemon law claim addresses situations where a new vehicle has substantial defects that impair its use, value, or safety and cannot be repaired after a reasonable number of attempts. For Loomis residents, establishing a claim typically requires documentation of repeated repair attempts, communication with the dealer or manufacturer, and evidence that the issue persists. This paragraph clarifies how timelines, warranty terms, and repair records play into the evaluation. Gathering invoices, service records, and written correspondence will strengthen a claim and help determine whether a buyback or replacement is appropriate.
California’s consumer protection framework provides remedies for defective new vehicles, but each case depends on the specific defect, repair history, and warranty language. For Loomis vehicle owners, local service centers and dealers often play a role in the repair history, so documenting every visit and issue description is important. The law looks at whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to fix the defect and whether the defect substantially impairs the vehicle. Understanding these criteria helps owners assess their options and presents a clearer path when engaging with manufacturers or pursuing a formal claim.
A defective new vehicle typically means a vehicle that, during the warranty period, develops a defect that substantially impairs its use, value, or safety and cannot be repaired after reasonable attempts. In Loomis cases, the focus is on documented repair attempts and whether the issue persists despite dealer efforts. Examples include recurring transmission failure, persistent electrical problems, or safety-related braking issues. The term also encompasses vehicles with recurring nonconformities that affect daily operation. Understanding how these standards apply to your vehicle helps determine whether to pursue manufacturer remedies or further legal action.
Successful lemon law matters hinge on careful collection of records, thorough documentation of symptoms, and timely communication with the manufacturer. For Loomis vehicle owners, key steps include preserving repair orders, keeping a log of problems and dates, and sending written notices when appropriate. The process may involve demand letters, settlement negotiations, and if necessary, litigation to secure a replacement or refund. Each stage requires attention to warranty terms and statutory deadlines, so proactive document management and clear communication are essential to achieving a favorable resolution.
This section defines common terms you will encounter in a defective new vehicle matter, such as warranty, buyback, reasonable repair attempts, and manufacturer’s duty to repair. For Loomis residents, familiarity with these terms helps in conversations with dealers and manufacturers and in maintaining accurate records. Understanding how these legal concepts apply to your situation makes it easier to evaluate settlement offers and understand potential outcomes. Keep copies of all service records and written communications to support any claim involving the vehicle’s performance under warranty.
The warranty period refers to the time frame during which the manufacturer promises to repair defects covered by the warranty without additional charge. For Loomis vehicle owners, it is important to know the start date of the warranty, any mileage limits, and what components are covered. Many lemon law evaluations focus on defects that arise within the warranty period and on whether repairs took place within that timeframe. Retain all service invoices and dealer communications that show the dates of repairs, as these records are essential to proving that the defect occurred while the vehicle was under warranty.
Buyback and replacement remedies address the outcomes manufacturers may be required to provide when a vehicle qualifies as defective under the law. A buyback typically involves the manufacturer repurchasing the vehicle and refunding the purchase price minus a deduction for use. A replacement remedy involves providing another comparable vehicle. Loomis owners who pursue these remedies should prepare documentation that supports the claim, including repair records and purchase documents. Negotiations often consider vehicle depreciation, incidental costs, and whether a court or informal settlement will determine the final relief.
Reasonable repair attempts describe the number and nature of repair efforts the manufacturer is given to fix a persistent defect. There is not a single numeric rule; instead, the assessment looks at the totality of attempts, the nature of the defect, and whether repairs meaningfully addressed the problem. For Loomis owners, careful tracking of every repair visit, the technician’s diagnosis, and the duration of each repair is important evidence showing that the manufacturer had the opportunity to correct the defect but failed to do so adequately.
Substantial impairment refers to a defect that significantly affects the vehicle’s use, value, or safety. Examples include defects that make the vehicle unsafe to drive, severely reduce reliability, or substantially diminish resale value. For Loomis residents evaluating a claim, documenting how the defect interferes with daily use, safety concerns, missed appointments, or added expenses can demonstrate substantial impairment. This concept is central to proving that a vehicle qualifies as a lemon and supports the pursuit of manufacturer remedies under California law.
When facing a defective new vehicle issue, Loomis owners can pursue informal negotiation with the manufacturer, participate in arbitration if available, or file a formal claim in court. Informal negotiation may lead to a quick resolution but can be less predictable. Arbitration can be faster but may limit remedies and appeal options. Litigation offers comprehensive remedies and court oversight but can take longer. Each option has tradeoffs related to timing, potential recovery, and procedural rules. Evaluating which path fits your circumstances depends on repair history, the severity of the defect, and your goals for resolution.
A limited approach focused on coordination with the dealer may be sufficient when the defect is minor, nonstructural, and can be resolved in a single documented repair visit. Loomis drivers who experience an isolated issue that is promptly fixed and does not recur may find that pursuing the dealer’s warranty repair process resolves the matter without formal legal action. Maintain clear records of the repair, any warranties extended by the dealer, and proof that the defect no longer exists so you can avoid escalation while preserving your rights if problems reappear later.
If the manufacturer promptly addresses the defect after early repair attempts and the vehicle returns to normal operation, a limited approach may suffice. For Loomis owners, tracking subsequent performance and ensuring that repairs are complete is important before deciding not to pursue further remedies. Keep copies of follow-up service records and communications that confirm the defect was resolved. If the problem recurs, those same records can support a later claim, so even when the matter appears closed, retain documentation of the repair work and any warranties provided.
A comprehensive legal approach is often needed when a vehicle undergoes repeated repairs for the same issue without a lasting fix, which suggests a systemic defect. For Loomis residents, this pattern typically strengthens a claim under the lemon law and may require formal demand letters, settlement negotiations, and possible litigation. Taking a full legal path ensures that all remedies, including buyback or replacement, are pursued and that statutory rights are asserted on the record. Thorough documentation and timely legal action can improve the likelihood of securing appropriate relief.
When defects affect vehicle safety or result in significant loss of value, pursuing a comprehensive legal route becomes more important. Loomis vehicle owners facing defects that compromise safe operation, such as braking or steering failures, should pursue all available remedies to address risk and financial loss. A full legal strategy examines manufacturer obligations, documents the severity of the defect, and seeks appropriate remedies, including compensation for diminished value and related costs. This approach prioritizes safety, full accountability, and remedies that reflect the impact of the defect.
A comprehensive approach can result in full remedies such as a refund, replacement vehicle, or monetary compensation for repairs and incidental expenses. For Loomis owners, pursuing the full range of legal options ensures manufacturers are held to their warranty obligations and reduces the chance of lingering problems. Comprehensive representation also handles communications with the manufacturer, preserves important records, and seeks fair value adjustments. This strategy can reduce stress for vehicle owners by managing the legal process and negotiating for solutions that address both safety and financial concerns.
Choosing a complete legal path can result in stronger leverage during settlement discussions and more transparent accounting of damages and costs. For Loomis residents, this can mean recovery of repair costs, reimbursement for consequential expenses, and a buyback or replacement that fairly reflects vehicle depreciation. A comprehensive approach ensures that deadlines are met, statutory rights are asserted, and any technical issues are communicated effectively to the manufacturer. Ultimately, pursuing all available remedies protects your investment and ensures a more certain path to resolution.
A comprehensive strategy increases the chances of securing a buyback, replacement, or full monetary recovery by presenting a well-documented case and asserting statutory rights. For vehicle owners in Loomis, this method includes compiling repair histories, demonstrating repeated attempts to fix the defect, and clearly communicating damages. With thorough documentation and formal legal actions when necessary, manufacturers are more likely to offer complete remedies that reflect the vehicle’s purchase price and any additional losses related to the defect. This approach aims to restore the owner economically and practically.
A comprehensive approach helps manage the timeline and procedural requirements that often determine the outcome of a claim. Loomis owners benefit from coordinated communication, preservation of evidence, and timely submission of notices and demands. Proper handling of these procedural elements prevents missed opportunities for relief and strengthens negotiating positions. By ensuring that repair records, written complaints, and statutory notices are filed correctly, this method enhances the likelihood of a favorable resolution and helps avoid procedural pitfalls that can delay or reduce recovery.
Keep a detailed log of every defect occurrence and every dealer or service visit, including dates, descriptions of the problem, and what repairs were attempted. For Loomis residents, having a clear diary plus official repair orders and invoices strengthens any potential claim and helps show a pattern of recurring faults. Also keep copies of emails and written correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer. Consistent documentation not only supports a lemon law matter but also helps track progress, identify recurring issues, and provide clear evidence during negotiations or formal proceedings.
Make written requests and confirmations part of every interaction with the dealer or manufacturer, and keep copies of all messages. For Loomis consumers, polite but firm written communication helps preserve a record of attempts to resolve the issue and demonstrates reasoned steps taken before pursuing formal remedies. If the manufacturer provides a claim number or contact person, record that information. Clear documentation of communications shows that you gave the manufacturer a chance to repair the defect and supports any later demand letters, arbitration filings, or court submissions.
Owners of defective new vehicles in Loomis may face ongoing safety risks, repeated downtime, or economic loss due to persistent mechanical or electrical failures. Seeking assistance ensures that repair histories and communications are properly documented and that legal remedies are pursued when appropriate. Professional assistance helps evaluate warranty coverage, calculate potential recovery, and manage negotiations with manufacturers. For many vehicle owners, this support leads to faster resolution, appropriate compensation, or a buyback, and removes the stress of direct negotiation with large manufacturers while protecting statutory rights.
Prompt action preserves options and evidence when pursuing a defective new vehicle claim. Loomis residents who delay may lose important documentation or miss deadlines under warranty or statute. Timely review of repair records and early communication with the manufacturer can improve settlement prospects and reduce the need for prolonged litigation. Assistance also helps identify when informal resolution is reasonable and when pursuing full remedies is more appropriate. Taking steps early can prevent further inconvenience and ensure that the vehicle owner’s rights are asserted thoroughly and professionally.
Many Loomis vehicle owners seek assistance when a new vehicle repeatedly presents the same problem despite multiple repairs, when safety systems fail intermittently, or when the vehicle suffers significant loss of value due to chronic defects. Other circumstances include persistent electrical malfunctions, transmission issues, and problems that leave the vehicle unreliable for daily use. In these situations, gathering service records, documenting the effect on daily life, and consulting about potential remedies helps determine whether a formal claim is appropriate and how best to pursue resolution with the manufacturer.
Recurring mechanical failures that return after multiple repair attempts often indicate a defect that may qualify for a lemon law claim. Loomis drivers experiencing repeated engine, transmission, or drivetrain problems should document each visit to the dealer, including the repair details and duration of the issue. Records showing multiple unsuccessful repair efforts strengthen the case that the manufacturer had sufficient opportunity to correct the defect but failed to do so. This documentation supports discussions about buyback, replacement, or other remedies available under California law.
Persistent electrical issues or intermittent safety system failures, such as problems with airbags, braking systems, or steering controls, present significant concern and may qualify a vehicle for lemon law relief. Loomis owners should promptly record instances where these systems malfunction and preserve service reports documenting attempts to address the problems. Safety-related defects often justify a more immediate and comprehensive legal response due to the risks involved and the impact on the vehicle’s reliability, value, and intended functionality.
A significant loss of market value caused by chronic defects can justify pursuing remedies under the lemon law. Loomis owners who find their vehicle’s resale value plummeting because of persistent mechanical or safety problems should document that decline and capture evidence of recurring repair attempts. Demonstrating both repeated failures and resulting diminished value supports claims for buyback or monetary compensation. Accurate records of purchase price, repair costs, and attempts to sell or trade the vehicle help quantify losses and shape negotiations with the manufacturer.
Law Republic APC is available to guide Loomis residents through defective new vehicle matters, offering case evaluation, documentation review, and representation in negotiations or litigation. We help identify whether the vehicle meets statutory standards for relief, assemble supporting records, and communicate with the manufacturer to pursue buyback, replacement, or monetary recovery. Our goal is to reduce the burden on vehicle owners by handling procedural tasks, preserving evidence, and advocating for fair outcomes. Contact information and steps to get started are provided for Loomis residents seeking assistance.
Loomis vehicle owners benefit from representation that focuses on thorough documentation and effective negotiation with manufacturers. Law Republic APC assists clients in organizing repair records, drafting demand letters, and exploring settlement options tailored to each case. Our approach emphasizes practical outcomes such as buybacks, replacements, or monetary recovery that address both repair costs and diminished vehicle value. We also keep clients informed about local considerations in Placer County to ensure a smooth process from intake to resolution.
Choosing representation ensures procedural requirements and deadlines are managed correctly, preserving the strongest possible claim. For Loomis residents, this includes timely notice to manufacturers, collection of service and purchase documents, and careful calculation of damages. We aim to provide clear guidance on whether informal resolution, arbitration, or filing a formal claim is the best path. Our role is to advocate for clients while minimizing disruption and working toward outcomes that reflect the impact of the defect on vehicle use and value.
We strive to communicate in plain language about the lemon law process and the realistic options available to Loomis owners. Clients receive help evaluating offers and understanding potential tradeoffs between faster settlements and comprehensive remedies. Our process emphasizes documentation, strategic negotiation, and assertive pursuit of manufacturer obligations. By taking steps to preserve evidence early, Loomis vehicle owners can pursue remedies more effectively and avoid avoidable delays in the resolution of defective vehicle claims.
Our process begins with a free case review to determine whether your Loomis vehicle qualifies under the lemon law and what remedies may be available. We collect repair histories, purchase documents, and correspondence, then assess repair timelines and warranty coverage. If informal negotiation is appropriate, we draft demand letters and communicate with the manufacturer. When necessary, we prepare for arbitration or litigation. Throughout the process we prioritize timely action, thorough documentation, and clear client communication to pursue the best available outcome on behalf of Loomis vehicle owners.
The first step involves gathering all relevant documents and reviewing the vehicle’s repair history to evaluate whether the facts meet lemon law standards. For Loomis residents, this means collecting service records, purchase agreements, warranty documents, and any correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer. We also document the impact of the defect on your daily use and safety. A careful initial review clarifies available remedies and informs the next steps, whether informal negotiation, demand letters, or preparation for arbitration or litigation.
We examine every repair invoice and warranty term to understand the timeline of defects and the scope of coverage. For Loomis clients, this step identifies whether defects occurred during the warranty period and whether repair attempts were sufficient. Detailed review helps quantify repair attempts, pinpoint recurring issues, and determine how the manufacturer responded. Accurate analysis of these records forms the foundation of any demand and helps shape negotiation strategy toward buyback, replacement, or monetary recovery.
We conduct a thorough interview to record symptoms, frequency of occurrences, and the practical effects of the defect on daily use and safety. Loomis clients are asked to provide dates, descriptions, and any communications with the dealer. This client-provided information complements service records by adding context about the defect’s impact. Together, these details create a compelling factual record to present to manufacturers and, if necessary, to a court or arbitrator to support claims for replacement or compensation.
After establishing the factual and documentary basis for a claim, we prepare a written demand that outlines the vehicle’s defects, repair attempts, and requested remedies. For Loomis vehicle owners, this demand sets the stage for negotiation with the manufacturer and provides an opportunity to resolve the matter without formal litigation. The negotiation phase seeks a fair remedy such as buyback or replacement and may include settlement of incidental costs. Maintaining detailed records of these communications is essential to preserve rights and support further action if negotiations fail.
We prepare a formal demand letter that summarizes the repair history, statutory basis for relief, and the remedy sought. For Loomis clients, the letter presents a clear timeline and documented evidence to the manufacturer, often prompting settlement discussions. The letter also communicates readiness to pursue further remedies if necessary. Effective demand letters can resolve many cases by prompting manufacturers to offer buybacks or replacements when the documentation demonstrates repeated failures and significant impairment to the vehicle’s use or safety.
During negotiations we pursue remedies that reflect the vehicle’s purchase price, repair costs, and any additional losses resulting from the defect. For Loomis residents, negotiations aim to secure a fair buyback or comparable replacement and reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses. We evaluate offers carefully and advise clients on tradeoffs between speedy settlement and pursuing fuller remedies. Clear documentation and a firm legal position often lead to favorable negotiated outcomes without the need for arbitration or litigation.
If negotiation does not yield a fair resolution, we prepare to pursue arbitration or file a lawsuit to enforce the vehicle owner’s rights. For Loomis clients, this involves assembling a comprehensive factual record, preparing legal pleadings, and presenting the case before an arbitrator or court. Arbitration can offer faster resolution, while litigation preserves the full scope of remedies and rights of appeal. We assess the best path for each client and proceed with the approach most likely to secure an appropriate remedy for the defective new vehicle.
When arbitration is the chosen path, we compile the record, draft statements and exhibits, and prepare witnesses or declarations to support the claim. Loomis vehicle owners benefit from a well-organized presentation of repair records, communications, and documentation of the defect’s impact. Arbitration often requires adherence to specific procedural rules and timelines, and we ensure compliance while advocating for remedies such as buyback or replacement. Proper preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable arbitration decision.
If litigation is necessary, we file the appropriate complaint and manage discovery, motions, and trial preparation to pursue full remedies available under the law. For Loomis clients this means coordinating evidence, preparing witness statements, and presenting arguments that show repeated repair attempts and substantial impairment. Litigation may recover buyback amounts, repair costs, incidental expenses, and sometimes statutory attorney fees. We develop a litigation plan tailored to each case’s strengths and the client’s objectives while keeping clients informed throughout the process.
A defective new vehicle under California law is typically one that has a substantial defect that impairs its use, value, or safety and remains unresolved after a reasonable number of repair attempts by the manufacturer or its authorized dealers. The focus is on whether the defect occurred during the warranty period, the frequency and scope of repair attempts, and whether the problem continues to materially affect the vehicle. Documenting repair visits and the defect’s practical impact helps determine whether a vehicle meets these standards. For Loomis residents, providing repair orders, purchase documents, and a written log of symptoms and dates strengthens a claim. These records allow a clear presentation of the defect’s persistence and its effect on daily use or safety. Early collection of documentation and timely communication with the manufacturer improve the chances of a satisfactory resolution, whether through negotiation, arbitration, or litigation.
There is no single numeric threshold defining reasonable repair attempts; courts and arbitrators consider the nature of the defect, repair history, and manufacturer response. Repeated unsuccessful repairs for the same issue often indicate that the vehicle is defective. For Loomis clients, the pattern of repair attempts, duration of the problem, and the defect’s impact on the vehicle’s use and safety are important factors in assessing whether the number of attempts was sufficient. Maintaining complete service records and documenting each visit helps demonstrate that the manufacturer had ample opportunity to correct the problem. These materials provide the factual basis required to press for remedies such as buyback or replacement, and they are central to negotiations or formal proceedings if needed.
Available remedies include repurchase of the vehicle with adjustments for use, replacement with a comparable vehicle, and reimbursement for repair costs and certain incidental expenses. In some cases, courts or arbitrators may also award compensation for diminished value or other related costs. The specific remedy depends on the facts of the case, the defect’s severity, and applicable warranty terms. For Loomis vehicle owners, the desired outcome is typically a buyback or replacement that accounts for depreciation and any out-of-pocket expenses. Detailed records of purchase price, repair costs, and related expenses are essential to calculating appropriate compensation and negotiating a fair settlement with the manufacturer.
You may need to pay for repairs initially if the dealer performs warranty work, but many repair costs are covered by the manufacturer’s warranty during the warranty period. Keep all invoices and receipts for repairs, towing, and rental vehicles since those expenses may be recoverable in a settlement or judgment. For Loomis residents, saving every receipt and documenting the reason for each expense strengthens the claim for reimbursement. If a claim proceeds to settlement or judgment, recovery of repair costs and incidental expenses is commonly part of the remedy. Clear documentation linking each expense to the defective condition helps ensure those amounts are considered during negotiations or in arbitration or court proceedings.
The time to resolution varies based on the complexity of the defect, the manufacturer’s response, and whether the case settles or proceeds to arbitration or litigation. Some cases settle within a few months after a well-supported demand, while others requiring arbitration or court action can take longer. For Loomis clients, prompt documentation and timely demand letters can shorten the timeline by encouraging early manufacturer engagement. If litigation is necessary, the process may extend over many months due to discovery, motions, and scheduling. Arbitration generally moves faster than court litigation but can still require significant preparation. Working proactively to compile records and present a clear case increases the likelihood of a quicker resolution.
Buyback settlements commonly include reimbursement for repair costs, towing fees, rental vehicle expenses, and other incidental costs directly related to the defective condition. The manufacturer’s offer may also account for a deduction for vehicle use. For Loomis vehicle owners, documenting these incidental costs with receipts and records is essential to recovering them in a settlement. A thorough presentation of repair invoices and receipts, along with an explanation of how the defect led to additional expenses, helps ensure these items are included in negotiations. Clear documentation increases the likelihood that incidental costs will be recognized and compensated by the manufacturer.
Used vehicles may be covered by lemon law protections in certain circumstances, particularly if a manufacturer’s warranty applies and the defect arises during the warranty period. Coverage often depends on whether the vehicle was sold new and whether the manufacturer’s warranty remains in effect. For Loomis residents, the specifics of the warranty and the vehicle’s service history determine whether a used vehicle qualifies for remedy under California law. If the warranty terms and repair history show that a recurring defect arose while covered, pursuing a claim may be appropriate. Documentation of warranty coverage, purchase details, and repair attempts remains crucial to establishing a compelling case in these scenarios.
Responding to manufacturer settlement offers requires careful consideration of whether the proposed remedy fully addresses repair costs, incidental expenses, and diminished vehicle value. For Loomis owners, evaluating offers against documented losses and desired outcomes helps determine whether to accept a settlement or continue negotiations. It is often beneficial to seek guidance before accepting any offer to ensure it reflects the full scope of potential recovery. Keeping thorough records of repairs, expenses, and communications supports informed decision making. If an offer seems insufficient, continuing negotiations or pursuing formal remedies like arbitration or litigation may be necessary to achieve a more complete resolution.
The most important records include repair invoices, service orders, purchase agreements, warranty documents, and any written communication with the dealer or manufacturer. For Loomis vehicle owners, a repair log noting dates, symptoms, and outcomes complements official invoices and strengthens a claim. Receipts for towing, rental cars, and other incidental costs are also essential to demonstrating the full impact of the defect. Organizing these documents chronologically and keeping copies of all correspondence creates a compelling factual narrative. Detailed records make it easier to present the claim to the manufacturer, an arbitrator, or a court and increase the likelihood of obtaining appropriate remedies.
To start a claim in Loomis, gather all relevant documents including the purchase agreement, warranty information, repair invoices, and a log of defect occurrences. Contact Law Republic APC for an initial review to evaluate whether the vehicle likely qualifies under the lemon law and to discuss potential remedies. Early collection of documentation and prompt communication with counsel improves the chances of a successful outcome. Once the records are reviewed, the next steps may include sending a formal demand to the manufacturer, negotiating a settlement, or pursuing arbitration or litigation if necessary. Law Republic APC assists Loomis residents through each stage, from initial evaluation to resolution, while ensuring that procedural requirements and deadlines are met.
