If you live in Loomis, California and believe your vehicle qualifies for a buyback under the state’s lemon law, it is important to understand the options available and what to expect during the process. This page focuses specifically on vehicle buybacks in Loomis, presenting clear information about buyer protections, timelines, documentation, and common outcomes. Law Republic APC represents clients across California, and our Loomis-focused content explains how state rules apply locally, what evidence typically matters most, and how to communicate effectively with manufacturers and dealers to pursue a refund or replacement through the lemon law buyback process.
Many vehicle owners who pursue a buyback face complex interactions with manufacturers, warranty providers, and dealerships that can delay resolution. This guide outlines practical steps to take when your new or used vehicle has persistent defects that substantially impair its use or safety in Loomis. You will learn about notice requirements, repair efforts that must be documented, the role of arbitration and legal filings, and how monetary recovery is calculated. If you need personalized help, contact Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323 for a consultation tailored to your situation in Loomis and Placer County.
Pursuing a vehicle buyback under California’s lemon law can restore financial security and remove a dangerous or unreliable vehicle from daily use. For Loomis residents, the main benefits include reimbursement for the purchase price, reflected depreciation adjustments, and potential recovery of incidental costs such as towing and rental car expenses. A buyback can also resolve ongoing safety concerns and avoid the stress of repeated repairs. Choosing to seek a buyback helps consumers reclaim a fair result when a manufacturer’s warranty repairs fail to correct substantial defects that interfere with driving, safety, or value.
Law Republic APC handles lemon law and vehicle buyback claims for residents across California, including Loomis and Placer County. The firm combines experience in consumer protection, warranty disputes, and litigation to guide clients through settlement negotiations and formal claims. We help gather and organize repair records, prepare demand letters, and represent clients in arbitration or court when necessary. Our approach emphasizes clear communication and practical strategies to achieve timely resolutions, and we provide Loomis clients with local context for repair resources, timelines, and manufacturer patterns that can influence case strategy.
A vehicle buyback under California’s lemon law typically arises when a manufacturer cannot repair a substantial defect after a reasonable number of attempts, or when the defect poses a safety risk. For Loomis residents, understanding what counts as a substantial defect, how repair attempts are counted, and what documentation matters is vital. Relevant records include repair orders, communications with the dealer and manufacturer, warranty paperwork, and dates of failed repairs. Knowing the window of time and mileage limitations that apply to your vehicle helps determine whether a buyback claim is viable and what remedies are available.
Buyback calculations in California take into account the vehicle’s purchase price, down payments, trade-in values, and a mileage offset to reflect the vehicle’s use before the defect was discovered. In Loomis, gathering accurate records of payments, financing terms, and the vehicle’s condition at purchase strengthens a claim. Consumers should also document safety concerns, driving impairments caused by the defect, and any costs incurred while the vehicle was in for repair. Clear evidence and a well-documented timeline increase the chances of a favorable buyback settlement or award.
A vehicle buyback happens when a manufacturer agrees to or is ordered to repurchase a vehicle that cannot be repaired to conform to warranty standards within a reasonable number of attempts. Under California law, a buyback typically provides the consumer with a refund of the purchase price minus a usage offset for mileage and possibly other adjustments. The buyback often includes reimbursement for incidental charges such as registration fees and certain repair-related expenses. In Loomis, understanding whether your situation meets statutory criteria and how a buyback would be calculated is the first practical step toward remedy.
Critical elements in a buyback claim include proving the defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s use, demonstrating repeated repair attempts, and documenting ongoing failure to conform to warranty obligations. The process typically begins with collecting repair orders and correspondence, notifying the manufacturer where required, and pursuing informal settlement negotiations. If negotiations fail, claims may proceed to arbitration or court. For Loomis consumers, timely documentation of each repair attempt and consistent follow-up with the dealer and manufacturer are essential procedural steps that support a stronger position in settlement talks or formal proceedings.
This glossary explains terms commonly used in lemon law and buyback discussions so Loomis residents can better understand their rights and the process. Key terms include mileage offset, reasonable repair attempts, nonconformity, manufacturer remedy, and incidental damages. Knowing these definitions helps when reviewing settlement offers or arbitration decisions and when communicating with dealerships and manufacturers. Clear comprehension of legal terminology supports informed decision-making and helps consumers in Loomis evaluate whether a proposed buyback reflects proper calculation and compensation.
Mileage offset refers to the deduction applied to the refund amount in a buyback to account for the consumer’s use of the vehicle prior to the manufacturer’s failure to repair the defect. In California, the offset is typically calculated based on the number of miles driven and the original purchase price or sale value. For Loomis residents, it’s important to verify odometer readings on the purchase paperwork and repair orders to ensure the offset is calculated accurately. Proper documentation can prevent an excessive reduction and help secure a fair buyback amount.
Reasonable repair attempts describe the number of times a manufacturer or authorized dealer must attempt to fix the same defect before a vehicle may qualify for a buyback. California law does not always state a fixed number, but commonly accepted standards depend on the nature of the defect and repair history. For Loomis consumers, keeping detailed records of each repair visit, including dates, descriptions of the issue, and repair outcomes, helps demonstrate that the manufacturer had sufficient opportunity to correct the problem but failed to do so.
Nonconformity means a defect or condition that prevents the vehicle from conforming to the express or implied warranty, impairing its use, value, or safety. Under California lemon law, showing that a defect is a nonconformity is central to establishing a buyback claim. For Loomis vehicle owners, documenting how the defect affects everyday driving, creates safety hazards, or reduces the vehicle’s value will support a finding of nonconformity. Repair shop notes, diagnostic reports, and communications with the manufacturer are useful evidence in this context.
Incidental and consequential damages can include costs like towing, rental car expenses during repairs, and certain other out-of-pocket losses caused by the defective vehicle. In buyback claims, consumers in Loomis may seek reimbursement of these costs in addition to the buyback refund. Maintaining receipts, invoices, and clear records of these expenses helps establish their reasonableness. While remedies vary based on the case facts and settlement negotiations, documenting incidental damages strengthens a consumer’s ability to seek full recovery of related losses.
When pursuing a vehicle buyback, Loomis consumers typically choose between informal negotiation, arbitration, or court litigation. Informal negotiation may yield a faster settlement but can produce lower recovery unless documentation is thorough and persuasive. Binding arbitration is often mandated by manufacturer warranties and can be faster and less formal than court, but procedures and remedies may vary. Litigation in court allows broader discovery and statutory remedies but can take longer and be more complex. The right path depends on evidence, timing, and the manufacturer’s willingness to settle fairly.
A limited negotiation approach can be sufficient when your repair history is straightforward and the manufacturer shows a willingness to resolve the issue promptly. For Loomis vehicle owners with well-documented repair orders, clear proof of repeated failed repairs, and manufacturer communications indicating openness to settlement, an organized demand letter may lead to a fair buyback without formal arbitration. This path is often faster and less emotionally taxing, but it still requires careful documentation and an understanding of how buyback amounts are calculated to avoid accepting an inadequate settlement.
When the financial losses and legal issues are relatively small and the defect issues are straightforward, pursuing direct negotiation might be a reasonable first step. Loomis residents who can demonstrate limited incidental costs, no serious safety concerns, and a straightforward calculation of refund amounts may resolve matters efficiently through direct settlement talks. Even in such cases, maintain complete records of repairs, costs, and communications to ensure any settlement compensates fairly and that the manufacturer’s proposed buyback properly accounts for mileage offsets and other deductions.
A comprehensive legal approach is needed when manufacturers dispute defect severity, deny liability, or when repair records are inconsistent. In Loomis, complex mechanical or electronic defects that intermittently present can lead to disagreements about whether sufficient repair attempts occurred. In those situations, pursuing formal arbitration or litigation allows more complete fact-finding, including depositions or expert testing, and creates leverage for a full buyback or other remedies. Comprehensive representation helps organize evidence, manage procedural requirements, and present a persuasive claim in a formal setting.
When a defect causes significant safety concerns or substantial financial loss, a full legal approach is often appropriate to maximize recovery and ensure accountability. Loomis vehicle owners facing repeated safety-related breakdowns, costly repairs, or serious injury risk should consider arbitration or court to pursue comprehensive remedies, including compensation for incidental costs and potential statutory penalties where applicable. A thorough approach ensures claims are fully documented and presented, increasing the likelihood of a buyback that reflects the true impact of the vehicle’s defects.
A comprehensive approach to a buyback claim often yields stronger outcomes by leveraging full documentation, formal dispute resolution tools, and legal procedures that compel discovery and clearer valuations. For Loomis residents, this can mean higher refund amounts, better reimbursement for incidental expenses, and more complete resolution of safety concerns. Comprehensive representation can secure a buyback that accurately accounts for depreciation, mileage offsets, past payments, and additional costs, while also addressing any history of manufacturer delay or denial in a way that encourages fair settlement.
Beyond financial recovery, a comprehensive strategy provides procedural protections and clarity about rights and obligations. Loomis vehicle owners pursuing a thorough claim benefit from organized evidence gathering, formal discovery, and the ability to present persuasive legal arguments about nonconformity and warranty performance. This approach helps reduce the likelihood of accepting an undervalued settlement and increases the chance of a complete remedy, whether through negotiated buyback, arbitration award, or court judgment, with the potential to recover additional damages in certain circumstances.
A comprehensive claim ensures that buyback calculations properly reflect purchase payments, trade-in values, registration fees, and mileage offsets, leading to stronger financial recovery. In Loomis, thorough analysis of financing documents and repair records prevents manufacturers from applying inappropriate deductions or undervaluing losses. Detailed presentation of these facts in negotiation, arbitration, or court increases the likelihood of a full and fair refund, and helps secure reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses incurred while the vehicle was repeatedly repaired or unusable.
Comprehensive representation advances both financial recovery and consumer safety by ensuring persistent defects are addressed and removed from service through buyback or other remedies. For Loomis residents, this approach means defective vehicles do not remain on the road, reducing risk to drivers and passengers. It also reinforces consumer rights by holding manufacturers accountable for warranty obligations, encouraging better responses to future defects, and providing Loomis consumers with clearer recourse when repairs fail to restore safe and reliable operation.
Maintain a complete and chronological file of every repair order, diagnostic report, and communication with the dealership or manufacturer. For Loomis residents, including dates, service descriptions, and technician notes helps establish the pattern of failed repairs. Keep originals or clear copies of invoices, warranty documents, and purchase paperwork. Accurate records support the claim of repeated failed attempts to fix the defect and are often the most persuasive evidence in settlement talks, arbitration, or court proceedings.
Keep receipts for rental cars, towing, replacement parts, and other out-of-pocket costs related to the defective vehicle, as these may be recoverable incidental damages. Also confirm and record odometer readings at purchase and during repairs to ensure mileage offsets are calculated correctly. For Loomis vehicle owners, meticulous documentation of incidental expenses and mileage minimizes disputes about deductions and strengthens claims for a fair buyback calculation.
If your vehicle continues to suffer from a substantial defect despite multiple repair attempts, a buyback claim may offer the most direct path to a meaningful remedy. Loomis owners experience significant disruption when recurring mechanical or electronic issues affect safety, reliability, or resale value. Pursuing a buyback can secure a refund that accounts for the initial purchase, trade-in values, and allowable offsets, and can provide compensation for related expenses. When repairs do not restore normal operation, pursuing a buyback is a practical way to resolve the problem permanently.
Beyond immediate financial considerations, a successful buyback restores consumer confidence and removes a defective vehicle from continued use. Loomis residents who seek a buyback are often motivated by safety concerns, escalating repair bills, and recurring service visits that disrupt daily life. A properly pursued claim can address those concerns while ensuring that the manufacturer assumes responsibility for vehicles that fail to meet warranty obligations, offering a comprehensive solution rather than ongoing temporary fixes.
Typical circumstances prompting buyback claims include repeated transmission failures, persistent engine problems, recurring electrical system malfunctions, or other defects that impair safety or normal operation. Loomis vehicle owners frequently seek buybacks after several unsuccessful repair attempts or when a defect causes a substantial reduction in vehicle value. Other triggers may include manufacturer recalls that fail to correct a problem, or a history of repair shop notes indicating ongoing unresolved issues that render the vehicle unreliable despite multiple services.
Recurrent issues like transmission slipping, engine stalling, or coolant system failures that persist after multiple repairs often justify pursuing a buyback. Loomis drivers who document each repair visit, symptoms experienced, and any roadside breakdowns increase the likelihood that the manufacturer will accept responsibility. Thorough records showing continued impairment to the vehicle’s functionality demonstrate that the defect substantially reduces the vehicle’s use and value, which is central to a successful buyback claim.
Safety-related defects such as brake failure, airbag nondeployment, or steering system faults that continue after repairs present strong grounds for buyback consideration. For Loomis residents, safety defects have a direct impact on personal risk and public welfare. Documenting safety incidents, technician warnings, and any regulatory recall notices helps establish the severity of the issue and supports a claim that the vehicle cannot be safely operated despite attempted repairs.
Modern vehicles rely heavily on electrical systems and software, and repeated faults in these areas can render a vehicle unreliable or unusable for intended purposes. Loomis owners experiencing continuing issues with vehicle electronics, powertrain controls, or infotainment systems that affect drivability or safety should track repair records and diagnostic codes. Such documentation bolsters a buyback claim by showing the defect’s persistence and the manufacturer’s inability to provide a lasting remedy.
Law Republic APC assists Loomis residents in evaluating potential buyback claims, organizing evidence, and pursuing appropriate resolutions through settlement, arbitration, or court. We explain the process step by step, help determine whether your vehicle meets statutory criteria, and prepare or review demand letters and settlement proposals. If informal attempts fail, we represent clients in formal proceedings to seek full recovery. For a consultation about your Loomis vehicle buyback concerns, contact Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323 to discuss your case and next steps.
Law Republic APC focuses on consumer protection matters, including lemon law buybacks and warranty disputes across California, with representation available to Loomis clients. Our team helps assemble repair histories, calculate appropriate buyback amounts, and communicate effectively with manufacturers and dealers. We prioritize clear client communication and practical strategies to achieve timely resolutions. When needed, we proceed to arbitration or litigation to protect client interests and seek full remedies under the law.
For Loomis residents, our familiarity with California lemon law procedures, common manufacturer practices, and local repair resources helps build strong claims. We guide clients through documentation requirements, notice procedures, and negotiation tactics that increase the likelihood of a fair buyback outcome. Our approach emphasizes efficient case preparation and realistic assessment of options to help clients decide the best path given the facts and the desired outcome.
Clients in Loomis can expect careful case review, personalized attention, and timely updates throughout the process. We assist in collecting necessary receipts, repair orders, and correspondence, and represent clients in discussions with manufacturers to pursue equitable resolution. When settlement is not achievable, we are prepared to advance claims through arbitration or court to enforce statutory rights and seek full compensation for buyback and related damages.
The process begins with a thorough intake to review repair records, purchase documents, and warranty information to determine whether a buyback claim is viable for Loomis residents. We then organize evidence, attempt negotiation through a formal demand, and, if necessary, initiate arbitration or litigation. Along the way we prepare documentation of incidental costs, calculate mileage offsets, and advise on settlement offers. Clear communication with clients in Loomis is prioritized so they understand options, expected timelines, and potential outcomes at each stage of the process.
In the initial phase we evaluate the repair history, warranty terms, and purchase documentation to confirm whether the vehicle meets buyback criteria under California law. For Loomis clients, this includes reviewing repair orders, odometer readings, and any correspondence with dealers and manufacturers. We identify gaps in documentation and guide the client in obtaining missing records. This stage sets the foundation for demand letters, settlement negotiations, or formal claims by establishing a clear timeline and the nature of repeated repair attempts.
Collecting all repair orders, service receipts, and written communications is essential to show a pattern of failed repairs. Loomis vehicle owners should provide copies of every visit to the dealer or authorized repair facility, noting dates, symptoms, and technician findings. We review these materials to build a chronological case file that demonstrates ongoing nonconformity and the manufacturer’s inability to correct the defect within a reasonable timeframe. Proper organization increases the likelihood of a favorable outcome during negotiations or formal proceedings.
Examination of purchase contracts, financing agreements, trade-in paperwork, and registration documents allows accurate calculation of the buyback amount. For Loomis clients, verifying down payments, monthly finance charges, and trade-in values ensures buyback calculations reflect actual payments and adjustments. This documentation also helps to confirm ownership, the vehicle’s condition at purchase, and any preexisting disclosures. Accurate financial records prevent improper deductions and support the consumer’s claim to a fair refund amount.
After assembling evidence, we prepare a formal demand letter that outlines the defect history, repair attempts, and requested remedy, such as a buyback. For Loomis residents, this demand communicates the legal basis for the claim and invites settlement discussions before initiating arbitration or litigation. Negotiations may involve back-and-forth on buyback calculations, incidental expenses, and timing. If a reasonable settlement is offered, we review terms with the client; otherwise, we proceed to arbitration or court to pursue the claim further.
The demand letter summarizes repair history, legal grounds for a buyback, and the specific compensation requested, including refund calculations and incidental costs. For Loomis clients, the letter includes documentation attachments and a clear deadline for response. A well-prepared demand often prompts manufacturers to reassess their positions and can lead to settlement. If the manufacturer declines or offers an inadequate resolution, the demand letter also serves as a documented record supporting further action in arbitration or court.
During negotiations we assess offers against the client’s expected recovery and advise on whether to accept or pursue formal dispute resolution. Loomis residents benefit from careful review of proposed buyback amounts, mileage offsets, and any release language that may limit future claims. We negotiate terms to maximize recovery while protecting client rights. If settlement is not achievable, we prepare to file for arbitration or litigation with a fully documented case file and clear litigation strategy.
If negotiation fails, many buyback claims proceed to arbitration or court. Arbitration is often faster and may be required by the manufacturer’s warranty, while litigation allows broader procedural tools. For Loomis clients, the choice depends on the case specifics, desired remedies, and strategic considerations. We prepare for formal hearings by securing affidavits, expert analyses if needed, and organizing documentary evidence. The goal is to present a compelling case that demonstrates the defect’s persistence and supports a full buyback or other appropriate remedies.
Arbitration involves submitting evidence and presenting arguments before an arbitrator or panel. Preparation includes compiling a complete record of repairs, financial documents, and witness statements to support the claim. Loomis residents should expect a focused hearing and written submissions that clarify the impact of the defect and the rationale for the requested buyback amount. A well-prepared arbitration file increases the likelihood of a favorable award and can often provide resolution more quickly than court litigation.
When arbitration is unavailable or insufficient, pursuing claims in court allows for discovery, testimonial evidence, and legal remedies under California statute. For Loomis clients, litigation may yield strong leverage for full recovery, including incidental damages and other statutory remedies where applicable. The court process can be lengthier, but it permits more comprehensive fact-finding and the ability to challenge manufacturer defenses. Preparing a litigation file involves careful documentation, witness preparation, and strategic presentation of how the defect affects safety, value, and use.
A vehicle may qualify for a buyback in California when it has a substantial defect that impairs its use, value, or safety and the manufacturer has been unable to repair that defect after a reasonable number of attempts. The precise requirements depend on the facts of each case, including the defect’s nature, the warranty terms, and the repair history. For Loomis residents, maintaining a clear timeline of repair visits, technician findings, and symptoms helps determine whether statutory criteria are met. If the defect persists despite repeated repairs, collect all repair orders, warranty documents, and purchase paperwork. These records will be vital in assessing buyback eligibility and in negotiating with the manufacturer or presenting the case in arbitration or court. Law Republic APC can review your documentation and advise on whether a buyback claim is appropriate for your circumstances.
Buyback amounts are typically calculated by refunding the purchase price or lease payments while subtracting a mileage offset to account for the vehicle’s use prior to the defect’s discovery. The calculation may also consider down payments, trade-in credits, and certain fees. For Loomis consumers, ensuring accurate odometer records and purchase documentation is essential to prevent incorrect offsets or deductions. Additionally, consumers may seek reimbursement for registration fees, sales tax, and reasonable incidental expenses incurred because of the defect. The precise calculation can vary with individual facts and negotiated settlements, so careful review of financing and purchase documents is important to maximize recovery.
California law does not always specify a fixed number of repair attempts that constitute a reasonable number; rather, it looks at the nature and severity of the defect and the repair history. Repeated attempts to fix the same issue, especially when the defect affects safety or significantly impairs use, are persuasive evidence that the manufacturer failed to provide a durable remedy. For Loomis owners, documenting each visit, repair outcome, and any continuing symptoms helps demonstrate that a reasonable number of attempts has occurred. In many cases manufacturers have internal arbitration rules or industry standards that guide how many repair visits are considered reasonable. When the number or nature of attempts is disputed, arbitration or court may be necessary to resolve whether the vehicle qualifies for a buyback.
Yes, in many buyback claims consumers can seek reimbursement for incidental costs directly related to the defective vehicle, such as towing, rental car expenses while the vehicle was in for repair, and reasonable out-of-pocket repair costs. To support these claims, Loomis owners should keep receipts and records of each expense and explain how the costs resulted from the vehicle’s nonconformity. Proper documentation is necessary to prove the reasonableness and direct connection of such expenses to the defect. Whether incidental costs are recoverable can depend on the specifics of a settlement or arbitration award, the statutory framework, and the strength of the documentation. Presenting these expenses clearly during negotiation or formal proceedings improves the likelihood of reimbursement.
Manufacturers sometimes offer a replacement vehicle instead of a buyback. Whether to accept a replacement depends on the vehicle’s history, the nature of the defect, and the consumer’s preferences. Loomis owners offered replacement vehicles should carefully review the terms to ensure the new vehicle is comparable and that any release language does not waive important future claims. Consideration should also be given to whether the replacement resolves safety concerns and whether any additional compensation for inconvenience or prior costs is appropriate. Before accepting a replacement, verify warranties on the new vehicle and confirm that any trade-in or buyback calculations are fair. Consulting with representation helps Loomis residents weigh the pros and cons of replacement offers and negotiate additional compensation if appropriate.
Not always. Some buyback claims are resolved through negotiation initiated by a well-documented demand letter without arbitration or litigation. For Loomis residents with straightforward repair histories and cooperative manufacturers, settlement can be achieved through direct talks. However, warranties often include arbitration clauses, and manufacturers sometimes refuse reasonable settlements, in which case arbitration or court may be necessary to secure a buyback or full recovery. When arbitration or litigation becomes necessary, it is important to be prepared with thorough documentation and a clear legal strategy. Representation can guide Loomis clients through procedural requirements, prepare evidence for hearings, and manage settlement discussions even during formal proceedings.
The timeline for a buyback claim varies depending on whether the matter resolves through negotiation, arbitration, or litigation. Simple negotiated settlements might be reached in weeks to months when documentation is complete and the manufacturer is cooperative. For Loomis clients, response times from manufacturers and the completeness of repair records can influence speed. Arbitration typically resolves faster than court litigation, but scheduling and procedural steps still take time. If litigation is required, the process can extend for many months or more, depending on discovery, motion practice, and trial scheduling. Throughout, maintaining open communication with the manufacturer and promptly responding to information requests can help keep the process moving efficiently.
A buyback itself typically does not directly affect your personal credit, because it involves an agreement between the consumer and the manufacturer rather than a new loan obligation. However, if a financed vehicle is repossessed or if payments fell into arrears unrelated to a buyback claim, that could impact credit. For Loomis consumers financing their vehicle, coordinating with lenders and documenting arrangements during the buyback process helps avoid unintended credit consequences. It is important to preserve records showing the settlement terms and any steps taken to address finance arrangements. Legal representation can assist in communicating with lenders when a buyback is pursued so consumers are protected from erroneous credit reporting or misunderstanding about loan obligations during the claim.
Before contacting a lawyer, gather repair orders, invoices, warranty and purchase documents, financing agreements, trade-in paperwork, registration, and any correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer. Also compile receipts for incidental expenses like towing and rental cars, along with notes summarizing symptoms, dates, and technician statements. For Loomis residents, having these materials organized chronologically makes initial case assessment more efficient and helps counsel evaluate the strength of a buyback claim quickly. If possible, include photos, diagnostic reports, and any recall notices related to the vehicle’s defect. Bringing a comprehensive file to your first consultation ensures that review is productive and that counsel can advise on next steps, likely outcomes, and potential remedies for your Loomis buyback matter.
Law Republic APC assists Loomis clients by reviewing documents, advising on statutory criteria, preparing demand letters, negotiating with manufacturers, and representing clients in arbitration or court when necessary. We help assemble a compelling record of repair attempts, calculate fair buyback amounts, and seek reimbursement for incidental costs. Our goal is to pursue timely and complete resolution while keeping clients informed about options and likely outcomes. We also assist with communications to lenders and help ensure settlements are documented to protect clients’ financial positions. For Loomis residents facing ongoing vehicle defects, our firm provides practical guidance and representation to pursue a fair buyback or other appropriate remedy under California law.
