If you purchased a defective vehicle in Norco, California and the manufacturer’s repairs have not resolved the issue, arbitration may be a required or strategic step toward resolving your lemon law claim. This page explains how arbitration works for lemon law disputes in Riverside County, what to expect during the process, and how representation can help you present your claim effectively before a neutral arbitrator. Law Republic APC handles lemon law matters for Norco residents and can discuss whether arbitration is appropriate for your situation, provide case assessment, and outline potential outcomes and remedies under California law.
Arbitration for lemon law disputes often serves as an alternative to court litigation and can move more quickly while remaining binding depending on the arbitration agreement and applicable statutes. For drivers and vehicle owners in Norco, the choice to pursue arbitration may depend on contract terms, the manufacturer’s demands, and the strength of repair and warranty records. Our firm represents clients in lemon law proceedings, gathers necessary documentation, and prepares written and oral presentations to support claims for repurchase, replacement, or statutory damages when the vehicle’s defects meet the legal threshold under California lemon law.
Arbitration can provide a focused forum for resolving disputes with vehicle manufacturers without the delays sometimes associated with court cases. For Norco residents, benefits include a more efficient schedule, the potential to keep proceedings confidential, and a process that can prioritize technical vehicle evidence such as repair records and diagnostic reports. When managed carefully, arbitration may yield remedies faster, including a vehicle repurchase or replacement and reimbursement for incidental costs. Representation ensures your documentation is organized, your claims are framed in terms of California lemon law standards, and your position is communicated clearly to achieve the best practical result.
Law Republic APC serves clients across California including Norco and Riverside County with a focus on lemon law, personal injury, and real estate matters. Our team handles arbitration and negotiation with vehicle manufacturers and their representatives, assisting clients in assembling repair histories, warranty communications, and other evidence necessary to support a lemon law claim. We work to keep clients informed throughout the arbitration process, explain legal options under California law, and advocate for remedies that reflect the inconvenience and financial impact of owning a defective vehicle. Contact Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323 to discuss your case.
Lemon law arbitration is a dispute-resolution process often used when a vehicle owner and a manufacturer disagree about whether a vehicle qualifies as a lemon under California law. For Norco residents, arbitration may be required by a purchase or lease agreement or chosen for its potential efficiency. The process involves submitting evidence and arguments to a neutral arbitrator who evaluates whether a defect substantially impairs the vehicle’s use or safety and whether reasonable repair attempts have failed. Knowing what records to collect and how to present repair history and communications with the manufacturer can improve the odds of a favorable arbitration decision.
Before arbitration begins, it is important to review warranty terms, the vehicle’s repair invoices, and any manufacturer communications about recalls or service campaigns. A detailed chronology of repair attempts, dates, and outcomes helps demonstrate a pattern of unresolved defects. For Norco consumers, gathering records from local dealerships or independent repair shops in Riverside County and preserving correspondence with the manufacturer provides the factual foundation arbitration panels rely upon. Legal representation can help ensure necessary documents are included, correct legal standards are applied, and that your presentation is persuasive and well organized.
In California, lemon law arbitration refers to a structured procedure where a neutral arbitrator reviews the dispute between a vehicle owner and the manufacturer to determine whether the vehicle meets statutory criteria for a lemon. Arbitration can be voluntary or mandatory depending on your purchase agreement and manufacturer programs. For Norco drivers, the arbitrator will examine whether the defect substantially affects the vehicle’s use, whether repairs were attempted within a reasonable number of tries, and whether the owner cooperated with repair efforts. Arbitration outcomes can include repurchase, replacement, or other monetary remedies under state law.
Successful arbitration involves assembling chronological repair records, warranty details, communications with dealerships and the manufacturer, and any diagnostic reports that show a persistent defect. The process typically includes initiating the arbitration claim, exchanging evidence, submitting written statements, and presenting oral arguments or hearings if permitted. During preparation, Norco claimants should review insurance and warranty coverage and calculate incidental costs such as towing or rental expenses claimed under lemon law remedies. Legal representation assists in organizing evidence, preparing witness statements, and articulating the legal standards that support a finding that the vehicle is a lemon.
Understanding common terms used in lemon law arbitration helps Norco residents follow the process and communicate effectively with arbitrators and manufacturers. Entries in this glossary clarify phrases such as reasonable repair attempts, implied warranty, cure period, and statutory remedies. Having clear definitions makes it easier to compile the right documentation and to present arguments about how defects affected vehicle use or safety. If you need help interpreting terms in your arbitration materials or purchase agreement, counsel can review documents and explain how those terms apply to your claim under California law.
Reasonable repair attempts refer to the number and quality of repair efforts a manufacturer or authorized dealer has made to fix a defect within a warranty period. Under California law, courts and arbitrators assess whether the manufacturer had a fair opportunity to repair the issue and whether the defect persisted despite these attempts. For Norco vehicle owners, documenting each trip to the dealer, the nature of repairs performed, and whether the problem recurred is important. This documentation helps demonstrate that, despite repeated repairs, the defect continued to substantially impair vehicle use or safety.
Statutory remedies are the legal outcomes available under California lemon law when a vehicle is found to be a lemon. Remedies can include mandatory repurchase, replacement, reimbursement for incidental expenses, and potentially civil penalties in certain cases. For Norco residents, an arbitration award may order the manufacturer to refund the purchase price minus a usage offset, replace the vehicle with a comparable one, or cover repair-related costs. Understanding these remedies helps vehicle owners assess potential outcomes and the relief they can request during arbitration proceedings.
The cure period is the timeframe in which a manufacturer is given notice and an opportunity to repair a perceived defect after it is first reported. This period allows the manufacturer to address issues without immediate legal action and is often defined in warranty or purchase agreements. For Norco consumers, documenting notice to the manufacturer and subsequent repair attempts within the cure period can be essential evidence in arbitration. Showing that the manufacturer had proper notice and failed to fix the defect supports a claim that the vehicle meets lemon law criteria.
A usage offset is a deduction from the refund amount that reflects the fair use the owner had of the vehicle prior to the discovery of the defect or prior to repurchase. In California lemon law calculations, an arbitrator or court may reduce the repurchase price by a mileage-based or time-based offset to account for the owner’s benefit from using the vehicle. For Norco claimants, accurate odometer records and the timeline of ownership and repair attempts are necessary to compute the correct offset and to argue for a fair deduction if applicable.
When facing a lemon law dispute in Norco, vehicle owners should weigh arbitration against litigation and informal negotiation. Arbitration can be faster and more streamlined than court actions and may be required by a contract clause, while litigation offers a full court record and potential for jury decisions depending on the case. Negotiation with the manufacturer sometimes leads to a settlement without formal proceedings. Assessing the relative benefits and limitations of each path—including timing, cost, and likely remedies—helps Norco consumers choose the approach that best aligns with their goals and circumstances.
A limited approach such as direct negotiation may be enough when the manufacturer acknowledges the defect and offers a timely repentance or replacement without dispute. For Norco drivers, situations where the manufacturer quickly agrees to repurchase or repair within warranty terms and covers related costs can make arbitration unnecessary. Maintaining organized repair records and a clear chronology of communications helps support these negotiations and can encourage a manufacturer to resolve the issue outside of formal proceedings, provided the owner is prepared to document the terms and confirm the remedy in writing.
When a defect is minor, does not substantially impair vehicle function or safety, and is corrected by a single effective repair, pursuing arbitration may not be necessary. Norco owners who experience an isolated problem that is remedied promptly and without recurrence will often find informal resolution quicker and more practical. It remains important to keep the repair invoice and any warranty work records, as these documents can be useful if problems reemerge or if further action becomes necessary in the future.
When a defect persists after multiple repair attempts and substantially affects vehicle use or safety, a comprehensive approach is often necessary to secure appropriate remedies. Norco owners in this position benefit from thorough review of repair records, strategic communication with the manufacturer, and preparation for arbitration or court proceedings if needed. A comprehensive approach includes documenting each repair attempt, securing diagnostic reports, evaluating warranty coverage, and calculating damages and incidental costs, all of which strengthen a claim under California lemon law.
If the manufacturer disputes the existence of a defect, challenges the number of repair attempts, or resists providing a remedy, a detailed legal approach becomes necessary. For Norco clients facing opposition, assembling persuasive evidence, identifying legal arguments under California statutes, and preparing for arbitration or litigation helps ensure claims are heard fully and fairly. Taking a comprehensive stance increases the likelihood that a neutral decision maker will consider the full scope of the problem and the impacts on the owner when awarding relief.
A comprehensive strategy helps Norco vehicle owners present a clear, organized case with complete documentation, making it easier for an arbitrator to evaluate the claim under California lemon law. This approach includes a methodical review of repair invoices, dealership reports, warranty communications, and any evidence of recurring problems. By preparing a detailed timeline and corroborating records, claimants increase the credibility of their position and reduce the risk that technical or procedural gaps undermine their claim. Comprehensive preparation also helps in negotiating favorable settlements when appropriate.
Comprehensive preparation also anticipates procedural challenges and addresses potential defenses a manufacturer may raise, such as allegations of misuse or lack of notice. For Norco residents, having a full evidentiary package enables more persuasive written submissions and oral arguments during arbitration. It also supports precise calculations of refund amounts, usage offsets, and incidental costs. Ultimately, a well-prepared case can shorten the resolution timeline, limit unexpected obstacles, and improve opportunities for a satisfactory remedy under California law.
Organizing repair records and assembling corroborating documents allows Norco claimants to demonstrate the pattern and persistence of defects in a clear manner. An arbitrator’s decision often turns on whether the evidence shows repeated failures to remedy a substantial defect. Presenting a clean timeline, original invoices, diagnostic reports, and correspondence with the manufacturer or dealership reduces confusion and enables the arbitrator to focus on the legal questions. Strong presentation increases the chance that the remedy awarded accurately reflects the vehicle’s condition and the claimant’s losses.
A thorough case file strengthens a Norco owner’s bargaining position when negotiating with a manufacturer or when resolving matters through arbitration. Manufacturers and their representatives are more likely to offer fairer settlements when presented with organized evidence showing persistent defects and documented repair history. Comprehensive preparation also allows accurate calculation of refunds, replacement costs, and incidental expenses, helping to secure remedies that reflect the true impact of the defective vehicle. Having a clear strategy reduces surprises and supports favorable outcomes.
Keep every repair invoice and service order related to the defect, including dates, odometer readings, descriptions of the problem, and parts replaced. These records form the backbone of a lemon law claim and help establish the chronology of repair attempts. For Norco residents, ask repair facilities to provide written explanations of the repairs performed and request copies of diagnostic tests. Proper recordkeeping simplifies presentation during arbitration and strengthens the case by showing repeated, unsuccessful repair attempts over time.
Have your case reviewed early to determine whether arbitration or another path is appropriate, and to ensure that critical documents are preserved and properly organized. While some disputes resolve through negotiation, prompt legal review helps prevent missed deadlines and identifies additional evidence that could strengthen the claim. For Norco consumers, an early assessment can clarify the most effective route to a remedy, whether that is a settlement, arbitration, or court action, and can help you understand potential outcomes and costs.
Arbitration representation can be particularly useful when a vehicle defect persists despite multiple repairs and the manufacturer’s offers are insufficient. For Norco consumers, representation ensures repair histories and legal arguments are presented clearly, and that remedies available under California law are pursued effectively. An attorney can calculate refund amounts, usage offsets, and incidental costs while handling procedural aspects of arbitration. Representation also helps preserve important evidence and navigate manufacturer processes so vehicle owners can focus on daily life while their claim moves forward.
Another reason to pursue formal representation is when manufacturer resistance or disputed facts make negotiation difficult. In such cases, a prepared arbitration submission backed by thorough documentation increases the likelihood of receiving fair compensation or a replacement vehicle. For Norco residents, the time saved and improved odds of a positive outcome often justify seeking legal help to manage communications, assemble proof, and present the strongest possible case based on California lemon law standards and applicable warranty terms.
Norco drivers commonly pursue arbitration when a defect affects vehicle safety or substantially impairs use and the problem remains unresolved after several repair visits. Other circumstances include disputes about whether the defect is covered under warranty, disagreement over the number of repair attempts, or when a manufacturer refuses to offer a repurchase or replacement that the owner believes is warranted. Additionally, when repair records are incomplete or manufacturers deny responsibility, arbitration representation helps organize the factual record and present the strongest legal arguments possible.
Persistent mechanical or electrical problems that recur after repeated repair attempts often prompt arbitration. These defects can limit vehicle use, create safety concerns, and cause ongoing time and expense for owners in Norco. Documenting each repair visit and its outcome helps show a pattern that supports lemon law claims. When problems persist, pursuing arbitration may be necessary to obtain a repurchase, replacement, or other compensation that addresses the inconvenience and financial impact of owning an unreliable vehicle.
When defects directly affect vehicle safety, such as braking or steering failures, owners in Norco may need prompt and decisive action. Safety issues that cannot be reliably repaired endanger occupants and other drivers, and can justify formal proceedings if the manufacturer does not provide an adequate remedy. Arbitration can address safety-related claims by focusing on repair history, dealer reports, and any manufacturer communications, and can result in remedies designed to remove unsafe vehicles from the road or compensate owners for their losses.
Manufacturer disputes about whether a defect is covered under warranty often require formal resolution through arbitration or litigation. Norco owners who face denial of coverage despite repeated repair attempts may need a neutral decision maker to interpret warranty terms and assess whether the defect meets statutory standards. Documenting the defect, repair attempts, and the manufacturer’s responses is key to challenging denials and seeking remedies under California lemon law, including repurchase or replacement when appropriate.
Law Republic APC is available to help Norco vehicle owners understand their rights and to evaluate whether arbitration is the right path. We assist with collecting documentation, preparing arbitration submissions, and communicating with manufacturers on your behalf. If you believe your vehicle may be a lemon, we provide practical guidance about next steps, explain possible remedies under California law, and discuss timelines and potential outcomes so you can make informed decisions. To learn more and schedule a consultation, contact Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323.
Clients from Norco and across Riverside County rely on Law Republic APC for personalized representation in lemon law matters because we focus on clear communication, careful documentation, and effective advocacy. We work to assemble repair histories and correspondence in a way that demonstrates the scope of the problem to an arbitrator or manufacturer representative. Our approach emphasizes understanding the client’s goals, calculating appropriate remedies, and preparing persuasive submissions designed to achieve practical results under California law while keeping clients informed at every step.
When cases require arbitration or further negotiation, we help clients prepare solid written narratives, supporting evidence, and witness statements where appropriate. Our practice includes managing timelines, filing required pleadings or arbitration requests, and engaging with manufacturer representatives on behalf of our clients. For Norco residents, this means someone is actively managing procedural requirements and advocating for remedies such as repurchase, replacement, or reimbursement for costs associated with the defective vehicle.
We also prioritize responsiveness to client concerns and practical guidance about what to expect during arbitration. From initial case review through resolution, our staff aims to reduce the burden on clients by coordinating document collection, communicating with repair facilities if needed, and presenting the strongest possible factual and legal picture of the defect. If you live in Norco and are dealing with a persistent vehicle problem, calling Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323 is a good first step to understanding your options.
Our process begins with a thorough intake to collect the vehicle purchase documents, warranty information, and repair invoices. We then review the repair chronology, evaluate whether the defect meets California lemon law criteria, and advise on the most appropriate next steps, including arbitration if warranted. For Norco clients, we prepare the arbitration submission, gather supporting documentation, and coordinate any necessary expert testing or dealership records. Throughout the process we explain potential remedies and maintain communication so you understand timelines and likely outcomes.
We begin by reviewing purchase documents, warranty terms, and the vehicle’s repair history to determine whether the issue may qualify under California lemon law. This stage involves requesting and organizing repair invoices, dealer service notes, warranty claims, and any correspondence with the manufacturer. For Norco owners, obtaining accurate odometer readings and a detailed timeline of repair attempts helps build the case. We also advise on preserving evidence and setting expectations about arbitration procedures and potential remedies.
Collecting every available repair invoice and service record is essential to show the number and nature of repair attempts. We assist Norco clients in requesting records from dealerships and independent mechanics and verifying that the documentation contains sufficient detail, such as dates, mileage, and descriptions of the defects addressed. These records form the factual foundation of any arbitration submission and help demonstrate whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to cure the problem.
We compile emails, letters, and summaries of phone calls with dealers and the manufacturer to show notice and responses. For Norco residents, demonstrating that you informed the manufacturer about the defects and gave them opportunities to repair strengthens the claim. Clear documentation of warranty claims, recall notices, or service bulletins also helps show whether the defect falls within warranty coverage or manufacturer responsibility under California law.
Once the documentation is gathered, we prepare a comprehensive arbitration submission that outlines the legal basis for the claim, provides a clear timeline of repair attempts, and includes supporting invoices and communications. For Norco clients, the submission highlights how the defect affected vehicle use or safety and details the relief sought, such as repurchase, replacement, or reimbursement of incidental expenses. A well-organized submission helps the arbitrator understand the facts and legal arguments efficiently.
We draft a concise but persuasive narrative that ties the factual record to California lemon law standards, explaining why the defect qualifies for relief. This narrative for Norco claimants emphasizes repair chronology, the persistence of the defect, and any dealer responses. It also addresses potential manufacturer defenses and presents calculations of damages or refunds sought, helping the arbitrator evaluate the claim in context.
Supporting evidence such as repair invoices, diagnostic reports, and witness statements are attached to the arbitration packet to corroborate the narrative. For Norco cases, witness statements from mechanics or dealership personnel can clarify what repairs were performed and whether the defect persisted. Including organized exhibits and clearly labeled documents streamlines the arbitrator’s review and helps ensure critical facts are not overlooked.
Depending on the arbitration forum and the case particulars, a hearing may be scheduled where each side presents arguments and evidence. The arbitrator then issues a decision based on the record and applicable law. For Norco clients, we prepare for hearings by rehearsing testimony, anticipating manufacturer defenses, and ensuring exhibits are admission-ready. If the arbitrator orders a remedy, we assist in enforcing that decision or in negotiating settlement terms consistent with the award.
When hearings occur, succinct oral presentations supported by clear exhibits help the arbitrator grasp the key issues quickly. For Norco claimants, we focus on the repair timeline, evidence of recurring defects, and documentation showing manufacturer notice. Effective courtroom-style organization of exhibits and a clear sequence of arguments improves the odds the arbitrator will appreciate the scope and severity of the problem and award an appropriate remedy.
After an arbitration award is issued, we assist Norco clients with compliance and enforcement if the manufacturer delays or resists the ordered remedy. In many cases, parties reach a settlement after exchange of positions or following an award. We help negotiate final terms and ensure paperwork reflects the agreed outcome. Our role includes tracking deadlines for refunds, arranging vehicle return logistics, and confirming that any monetary awards are properly disbursed.
Arbitration is an alternative dispute resolution process where a neutral arbitrator hears both sides and issues a binding or nonbinding decision depending on the agreement or arbitration program. In lemon law matters for Norco residents, arbitration may be provided by the manufacturer’s dispute resolution program or agreed to by the parties, and it is often faster and more streamlined than traditional litigation. The arbitrator evaluates the repair history, warranty terms, and legal standards under California law to determine whether the vehicle qualifies as a lemon and what remedy is appropriate. Preparing for arbitration requires compiling repair invoices, dealer communications, warranty documents, and any supporting diagnostics or witness statements. Presenting a clear timeline of repair attempts and demonstrating that the defect substantially impaired the vehicle’s use or safety are essential. Legal assistance helps organize these materials, draft persuasive written submissions, and present oral arguments in a way that highlights relevant legal standards and factual evidence for the arbitrator’s review.
Consider arbitration when your purchase or lease agreement mandates it, when the manufacturer’s program offers an efficient path to resolution, or when you prefer a faster process than court litigation. For many Norco owners arbitration reduces administrative delays and can lead to quicker remedies. However, if your contract allows court litigation and you prefer a jury trial or seek certain types of remedies, litigation may remain an option. Choosing between arbitration and litigation depends on the specifics of your case, including contract terms and the strength of your evidence. A legal review helps determine whether arbitration is required, advisable, or likely to produce an acceptable outcome. Discussing the likely timeline, costs, and potential remedies with counsel can clarify which route best suits your goals.
Key evidence includes repair invoices and service orders showing dates, mileage, and descriptions of defects and repairs, correspondence with the dealer and manufacturer, warranty documentation, and diagnostic reports that corroborate recurring problems. A detailed timeline that links each repair attempt to subsequent failures is particularly persuasive in arbitration. For Norco claimants, obtaining copies of all dealership records and any written statements from mechanics helps build a strong factual record. Additional evidence such as photographs, videos demonstrating the defect, and records of related expenses like towing or rental costs can strengthen the claim for incidental damages. Witness statements from repair technicians or dealership employees may also clarify what repairs were done and whether the defect persisted despite those efforts.
In some cases, manufacturers include arbitration clauses in purchase or lease agreements that require disputes to be resolved through arbitration rather than through court. If your agreement contains such a clause, you may be contractually obligated to pursue arbitration. However, the enforceability of arbitration clauses can vary based on contract specifics and statutory protections, so it is important to have agreements reviewed to understand your rights. If you prefer court litigation but are subject to an arbitration clause, counsel can evaluate whether the clause applies to your lemon law claim and whether statutory exceptions or other legal arguments might permit court action. Legal advice helps clarify whether arbitration is mandatory or whether alternative paths are available.
Through lemon law arbitration in California, claimants may seek remedies such as a repurchase of the vehicle, replacement with a comparable vehicle, reimbursement for repair costs and incidental expenses, and in some cases statutory damages. The specific remedy depends on the nature of the defect, the number of failed repair attempts, and the evidence presented to the arbitrator. Calculations often account for a usage offset reflecting the benefit the owner derived from the vehicle prior to repurchase. Arbitration awards may also include reimbursement for towing, rental car costs, and other direct expenses caused by the defective vehicle. Understanding which remedies are available and how they are calculated helps Norco owners set realistic expectations and pursue documentation that supports the full range of relief permitted by California law.
The length of arbitration varies depending on the arbitration forum, the complexity of the case, and the scheduling availability of the arbitrator. Some manufacturer arbitration programs provide expedited timelines, while independent arbitration or hearings with extensive evidence can take longer. For Norco residents, straightforward cases with clear repair histories may resolve within a few months, while contested matters requiring hearings can extend longer. Efficient preparation and timely submission of documents help shorten the process. Working with counsel to assemble a complete evidentiary package, meet procedural requirements, and respond promptly to requests can reduce delays and help keep the case moving towards resolution.
Arbitration records themselves are typically not public in the same way court filings are, as many arbitration proceedings are confidential depending on the rules of the arbitration forum or the terms of settlement. For Norco owners, confidentiality can be beneficial in keeping dispute details out of public records. However, certain outcomes like a repurchase or replacement may be noted on vehicle history reports if properly recorded, and disclosures to buyers or dealers may be necessary under some circumstances. If privacy is a concern, consult with counsel about confidentiality provisions and how settlements or awards should be documented to minimize public impact. Attorneys can negotiate terms that address record handling and the extent to which the matter will be disclosed to third parties or reflected in vehicle histories.
A usage offset reduces the refund amount in a repurchase award to account for the duration and mileage during which the owner benefited from the vehicle. Calculations typically use odometer readings at purchase and at the time of claim or repurchase to determine a fair deduction. For Norco vehicle owners, accurate mileage documentation and the timeline of defect discovery and repair visits are important to ensure the offset is calculated correctly and fairly. Arbitrators consider statutory formulas or case law when applying usage offsets, and parties may present arguments about the appropriate method of calculation. Presenting clear records and a reasoned argument about the appropriate offset helps protect the owner’s net recovery and ensures the final remedy reflects equitable considerations.
If a manufacturer offers a settlement before arbitration, carefully review the terms to ensure the remedy adequately addresses the defect and compensates for related costs. Settlements can offer faster resolution and avoid the uncertainty of arbitration, but it is important to confirm that the proposed terms include necessary repairs, repurchase calculations, and reimbursement for incidental expenses. For Norco clients, counsel can review settlement offers to confirm they are fair and to negotiate improved terms where appropriate. Always obtain settlement terms in writing and verify how the agreement will be documented with respect to vehicle history or future disclosures. Legal review helps ensure the settlement resolves all relevant claims and includes clear procedures for completing the remedy, including timelines for refunds or vehicle exchanges.
Law Republic APC assists Norco clients by reviewing purchase and warranty documents, compiling repair records, and preparing arbitration submissions tailored to California lemon law standards. We help identify the most compelling evidence, calculate potential remedies, and communicate with manufacturers and arbitration administrators on your behalf. Our role includes organizing exhibits, drafting persuasive narratives, and preparing clients for hearings when necessary. By managing procedural requirements and advocating during negotiations or arbitration, we aim to reduce the client’s burden and increase the likelihood of a favorable outcome. If you live in Norco and suspect your vehicle is a lemon, contact Law Republic APC at 818-532-5323 to schedule a case review and discuss the next steps.
