Law Republic APC represents individuals and businesses in Temecula, California who are confronting disagreements over property ownership, contracts, boundaries, or escrow. Real estate disputes can interrupt transactions, delay sales, increase costs, and threaten ownership interests. Early assessment of claims, careful evidence collection, and a clear plan for negotiation or settlement can protect your position. Our team helps clients understand legal options, timelines, and potential outcomes so they can choose a path aligned with their goals. Whether the dispute involves a residential sale or a commercial property matter, timely legal attention often improves both financial and practical results.
Residents and business owners in Temecula often prefer to resolve property disagreements without lengthy court proceedings, and alternative dispute resolution can offer efficient pathways to settlement. We explain options such as negotiation, mediation, and arbitration, helping clients weigh costs, timeframes, and likely results. When litigation becomes necessary, we prepare clear pleadings, preserve evidence, and advocate for remedies that protect property rights and financial interests. Our approach emphasizes communication, realistic assessment of risk, and strategic planning tailored to the specifics of each case. If you face a real estate conflict in Temecula, a focused consultation will identify practical next steps.
Real estate dispute resolution helps Temecula property owners avoid prolonged uncertainty and financial exposure by clarifying rights and seeking enforceable outcomes. Prompt attention to disagreements over contracts, title issues, boundary lines, or escrow can prevent escalation and reduce legal costs. Effective resolution restores stability to property transactions and occupancy, protects investment value, and can preserve important relationships between neighbors, buyers, and sellers. By outlining realistic legal options and pursuing timely remedies, clients gain confidence in their next steps and a practical path forward that balances cost, speed, and enforceability of outcomes in local courts or through private settlement processes.
Law Republic APC serves Temecula and surrounding Riverside County with focused representation in real estate disputes, combining courtroom advocacy with practical settlement efforts. Our attorneys have handled matters involving purchase agreement disputes, escrow claims, landlord-tenant disagreements, deed and title conflicts, and boundary disputes. We are committed to clear client communication, thorough preparation, and strategic decision making. Clients receive candid assessments of potential outcomes and costs so they can make informed choices. Our work includes negotiating favorable settlements, preparing cases for trial when necessary, and pursuing or defending claims to protect property interests and financial stability.
Real estate dispute resolution in Temecula encompasses a range of processes designed to address conflicts related to property transactions and ownership. Services typically include case evaluation, document review, negotiation with opposing parties, representation in mediation or arbitration, and litigation when settlement is not achievable. The process begins with a careful review of purchase contracts, lease agreements, title documents, and correspondence to identify claims and defenses. Clients benefit from a clear roadmap that sets expectations for timing, possible remedies, and costs, enabling them to make decisions that reflect both legal realities and personal or business priorities.
Resolving a real estate dispute often requires coordination with professionals such as title companies, surveyors, and escrow agents to confirm facts and preserve evidence. Our role is to assemble documentation, prepare legal filings, and advocate for remedies such as monetary damages, specific performance, quiet title, or corrective deeds. We also assist clients in evaluating settlement offers and negotiating terms that reduce future risk. By explaining procedural steps and likely outcomes under California law, we help Temecula property owners and investors understand how to protect their rights and move transactions or ownership matters toward final resolution.
Real estate dispute resolution refers to the legal and negotiated processes used to resolve disagreements about property rights, contracts, and transactions. In Temecula, these matters commonly involve claims arising from purchase agreements, escrow failures, title defects, boundary encroachments, or landlord-tenant conflicts. Resolution can occur through direct negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or court litigation depending on the parties’ goals and contractual requirements. The selected approach determines timelines, confidentiality, and the potential for appeal. Understanding these pathways helps property owners choose methods that align with urgency, cost sensitivity, and desired finality of the outcome.
A real estate dispute typically begins with document review to identify contractual obligations, title issues, and relevant communications. Next comes fact gathering, which may involve depositions, inspections, and engaging surveyors or title companies. Parties often attempt negotiation to reach a settlement; when negotiations stall, mediation or arbitration may be used if contract clauses require those steps. Litigation follows when alternative processes are insufficient or unavailable. Throughout, attorneys draft pleadings, file motions, and prepare evidence for trial. Each stage requires timely action to preserve claims, liens, or counterclaims under California procedural rules.
This glossary clarifies terms frequently encountered in Temecula real estate disputes, helping clients understand legal documents and discussions. Knowing definitions for items like title defects, escrow, quiet title, lis pendens, and specific performance makes it easier to evaluate options and communicate effectively. We provide plain-language explanations so clients can focus on decision making rather than legal jargon. Clear comprehension of these terms supports efficient negotiations and informed choices about whether to pursue settlement, arbitration, or litigation based on the specifics of each matter and the remedies available under California law.
A title defect is any problem that casts doubt on legal ownership or the ability to transfer property free and clear. Title defects can arise from clerical errors, undisclosed liens, forged signatures, missing signatures, or unresolved probate issues. In Temecula transactions, discovering a title defect can delay or derail a sale and may give rise to claims against sellers, title companies, or others involved in the chain of title. Addressing a title defect often requires review by a title company, corrective deeds, quiet title actions, or negotiated settlements to clear the record and enable a clean transfer of ownership.
An escrow dispute occurs when parties disagree about the handling or disbursement of funds and documents held by an escrow agent during a real estate transaction. Common causes include unmet contract contingencies, conflicting closing instructions, or alleged fraud. Escrow disputes in Temecula may delay closings, create exposure to damages, or require court intervention to resolve who is entitled to funds. Resolving these disputes often involves reviewing escrow instructions, purchase agreements, and communications, and may lead to mediation, interpleader actions, or negotiated releases to determine rightful distribution of escrowed assets.
A boundary dispute arises when property owners disagree about the precise location of property lines, easements, or encroachments. These conflicts can stem from survey inaccuracies, unclear deeds, or physical changes such as fences or structures. In Temecula, resolving a boundary dispute may require a professional survey, negotiation between neighbors, recording of corrected deeds, or a quiet title or partition action in court. Remedies can include corrective deeds, removal of encroachments, or agreements that allocate maintenance and access rights to avoid future conflict and clarify ownership boundaries.
Specific performance is a legal remedy that asks a court to require a party to fulfill contractual obligations, most commonly used when monetary damages are inadequate, such as in unique real estate transactions. In Temecula cases, a buyer might seek specific performance to compel a seller to complete a sale when the property is unique and damages would not provide an adequate remedy. Courts weigh fairness, contract terms, and equitable considerations before ordering specific performance. This remedy requires careful preparation and compelling evidence to show the court that enforcing the contract is an appropriate and enforceable outcome.
Temecula property owners choosing between negotiation, mediation, arbitration, or litigation should weigh time, cost, privacy, and enforceability. Negotiation and mediation are typically faster and less costly, offering flexibility and confidentiality, but require cooperation from both sides. Arbitration delivers a binding decision outside of court and can limit appeals, while litigation provides access to formal discovery and public proceedings but often takes longer and costs more. Understanding how each option aligns with the particular dispute and contractual provisions helps clients select a strategy that balances speed, finality, and the likelihood of a favorable outcome.
Smaller disputes involving contract interpretations or escrow handling often resolve through direct negotiation or mediation without the need for full litigation. When the factual record is straightforward and parties remain willing to communicate, these approaches can restore transactions and allocate responsibilities quickly. In Temecula, many residential sale issues fall into this category when timelines matter and the cost of litigation would outweigh potential recovery. A measured approach preserves relationships and reduces expense, while still creating enforceable settlement agreements that address the parties’ immediate concerns.
Errors in documentation, such as clerical mistakes or missing signatures, can often be resolved through corrected deeds, title company interventions, or short negotiated fixes. In Temecula real estate matters, resolving these issues without court action can prevent closing delays and reduce transaction costs. Working with title companies and issuing corrected documents typically resolves the matter when underlying rights are not substantially disputed. This limited approach is practical for clients seeking to complete a sale or clear a title quickly while minimizing legal fees and disruption.
Complex disputes involving title chains, multiple claimants, or disputed ownership often require a comprehensive legal strategy that uses discovery, expert consultation, and litigation tools. In Temecula, these matters may involve probate issues, unresolved liens, or competing deeds that demand thorough legal analysis and court intervention to clarify ownership interests. A comprehensive approach coordinates multiple procedural steps, preserves claims through filings like lis pendens, and marshals evidence necessary to obtain a definitive court judgment, which provides the certainty needed to clear title or resolve competing claims.
When a failed transaction threatens significant financial loss or when a party refuses to comply with contract terms, pursuing a full legal strategy may be necessary to achieve meaningful remedies. Temecula buyers or sellers facing breached purchase agreements, concealed defects, or fraudulent conduct may need thorough litigation to seek damages, specific performance, or other court-ordered remedies. This comprehensive path involves in-depth factual development, motions practice, and trial readiness to secure enforceable results that restore client position and address substantial financial consequences.
A comprehensive approach offers the advantage of a full procedural toolkit to protect rights and pursue complete remedies when disputes are complex or stakes are high. It enables preservation of claims, thorough discovery, and the ability to seek judicial remedies such as quiet title, injunctive relief, or monetary damages. For Temecula property owners, taking a broad view reduces the risk of unresolved claims resurfacing later and can produce definitive court orders that clear title or enforce contractual duties. This route can also create leverage in settlement discussions by demonstrating readiness to litigate.
Comprehensive representation also coordinates with technical professionals, such as surveyors and title officers, to assemble persuasive evidence and present clear legal arguments. That coordination is important for demonstrating factual and legal positions in court or at alternative dispute resolution. By developing a complete record and legal theory, clients improve their likelihood of favorable resolution and ensure remedies address all aspects of a dispute. For Temecula residents and investors, this can mean a faster return to transactional certainty, restored property use, or recovery of financial losses tied to the conflict.
A comprehensive approach strengthens a client’s position by ensuring all legal arguments and supporting evidence are prepared and available for use in negotiations or at trial. In Temecula disputes, a well-documented case informs settlement strategy and can deter weak offers, while also providing the basis for motions and jury presentation if litigation proceeds. That readiness increases the likelihood of favorable outcomes and often shortens the overall dispute timeline by creating momentum toward resolution through either negotiated agreement or enforceable court orders.
Thorough preparation reduces the risk of unexpected developments that can prolong disputes or increase costs. By conducting early investigation, preserving evidence, and addressing procedural matters proactively, Temecula property owners can avoid last-minute setbacks. Comprehensive planning also identifies potential defenses and counterclaims, enabling more informed decisions about settlement versus litigation. Clients benefit from predictable timelines and clearer expectations, which helps them manage financial and operational impacts while pursuing durable solutions to property conflicts.
When a real estate dispute arises, prompt action can preserve claims and prevent loss of legal remedies. In Temecula matters, deadlines for filing actions, placing notices on title, or contesting escrow disbursements can be short. Collect contracts, communications, receipts, and any inspection or survey reports immediately. Preserving physical evidence and documenting timelines strengthens your position. Early consultation helps identify critical steps such as filing lis pendens, placing hold notices on escrow, or issuing demand letters. That timely attention often improves the prospects for favorable resolution without unnecessary delay or expense.
Alternative dispute resolution methods such as mediation or arbitration can save time and costs compared with full litigation and may preserve privacy. Mediation allows parties to negotiate with a neutral facilitator and often produces creative settlements tailored to both sides’ needs. Arbitration provides a binding decision with more limited appeal options and can be faster than court. In Temecula disputes, evaluating contract clauses for ADR requirements and assessing the likely outcomes of settlement versus trial helps determine the best path. ADR can be particularly useful when parties want to maintain business relationships or close transactions more quickly.
Legal help is often needed when property disputes threaten transactions, ownership rights, or financial stability. In Temecula, even routine sales can become contentious when contracts are ambiguous, disclosures are incomplete, or escrow instructions are disputed. Representation clarifies legal rights, prepares persuasive documentation, and negotiates on your behalf to protect interests. Counsel can also determine whether immediate filings or protective measures are required to preserve claims. When parties face potential loss of sale proceeds, disputed title, or unresolved encroachments, timely legal assistance helps prevent further harm and positions clients for better outcomes.
Another reason to seek legal assistance is when the other party refuses to cooperate or when factual disputes are complex. Litigation tools such as discovery and depositions can uncover evidence and establish responsibility, while motions can resolve legal questions quickly. For Temecula property owners, legal counsel helps assess the likely cost-benefit of different paths, whether that means pursuing a settlement, arbitration, or trial. Skilled representation also negotiates settlement terms that address future risks, enforceability, and clear transfer of title, offering peace of mind and practical resolution.
Common triggers for real estate disputes in Temecula include failed closings due to unmet contingencies, hidden defects discovered after purchase, escrow disagreements, unresolved liens, title defects, and neighbor boundary conflicts. Disputes also arise from misrepresentation in listing materials, disagreements about repairs, or landlord-tenant conflicts. Each situation presents unique factual and legal challenges that affect remedies and timing. Addressing these matters early with legal review can prevent escalation and help choose the most practical path to resolution, whether that is negotiation, ADR, or court proceedings.
Failed closings and escrow disputes often occur when contingencies are not satisfied, financing falls through, or parties disagree about release of funds. These disputes can leave buyers without property and sellers without proceeds, creating immediate financial stress. In Temecula transactions, reviewing escrow instructions, purchase agreements, and communications helps determine rights and obligations. Legal action or mediation may be necessary to resolve entitlement to deposits, direct completion of the sale, or recover damages. Early legal review clarifies options and deadlines to preserve remedies.
Title problems, such as undisclosed liens, clerical errors, or competing claims, can prevent a clean transfer of ownership and expose buyers or sellers to liability. Addressing these issues in Temecula typically involves title company review, corrective instruments, or quiet title litigation to clear the record. Resolving title problems may require coordination with prior owners, lienholders, or probate representatives. Legal guidance ensures that action is taken promptly to protect the transaction and avoid future claims against ownership or possession.
Boundary disputes and encroachments arise from unclear deeds, surveys, or the placement of fences and structures. These conflicts can affect property value, use, and enjoyment, and may require professional surveys and negotiation or court action to resolve. In Temecula, resolving such disputes can involve corrective deeds, easement negotiations, or quiet title actions to clarify rights. Addressing boundary issues early limits damage and reduces the risk of protracted litigation, while negotiated agreements can provide practical solutions for long-term coexistence between neighboring property owners.
Law Republic APC is available to consult with Temecula residents and businesses about real estate disputes and possible remedies. We begin with a careful review of documents and facts, explain potential legal paths, and recommend practical next steps tailored to the client’s goals. Our focus is on clear communication, timely action, and pursuing resolution options that preserve value and reduce disruption. Call 818-532-5323 to arrange a consultation and learn how to protect your property interests and move forward with confidence in Temecula real estate matters.
Clients choose Law Republic APC for practical representation in Temecula because we combine thorough legal preparation with attentive client service. We focus on understanding each client’s objectives, evaluating risks, and pursuing the most efficient path to resolution, whether negotiation, ADR, or litigation. Our approach emphasizes transparent communication about timing and likely outcomes so clients can make informed choices. We work to minimize disruptions to transactions and preserve financial interests throughout the dispute resolution process.
When a dispute becomes complex or involves competing claims, our team coordinates with title companies, surveyors, and other professionals to build a persuasive factual record. That coordinated approach supports negotiation leverage and trial readiness when needed. For Temecula property owners, this means decisions are based on clear evidence and sound legal strategy, improving the prospects for favorable settlement or court rulings that resolve ownership and contractual issues.
Our firm also helps clients consider the cost-benefit of resolution pathways, recommending ADR when appropriate to save time and expense, and preparing for litigation when needed to secure enforceable remedies. We prioritize client goals and work to achieve outcomes that restore transactional certainty, clear title, or recover losses. Contact Law Republic APC to discuss how we can assist with your Temecula real estate dispute and provide practical legal guidance.
Our legal process begins with an intake and document review to identify claims, defenses, and immediate deadlines. We then gather relevant evidence, coordinate with any necessary technical professionals, and recommend an initial strategy tailored to the client’s priorities. If settlement is feasible, we pursue negotiation and ADR; if not, we prepare litigation filings and proceed through discovery. Throughout, we keep clients informed about progress, options, and anticipated timelines so they can make sound decisions and plan financially while the dispute is addressed.
The first step focuses on reviewing contracts, title records, escrow instructions, and all communications related to the transaction. We identify legal claims and defenses, assess statutes of limitation and filing deadlines, and gather documents that support the client’s position. This stage often includes contacting title companies, securing surveys, and preserving critical evidence. A thorough initial review establishes the factual and legal foundation for negotiation or litigation and helps define realistic goals for resolving the dispute efficiently.
A detailed document review identifies the core issues and helps determine the strongest legal claims. We examine purchase agreements, disclosures, escrow records, title reports, and communications to understand the sequence of events and contractual obligations. This assessment clarifies whether settlement is feasible and which remedies may be sought. Document review also reveals immediate steps needed to preserve rights, such as filing notices or requesting hold on disbursements, which is often important to secure remedies during negotiations.
When disputes involve boundary lines, title issues, or construction defects, we engage surveyors, title officers, or inspection professionals to produce reliable evidence. These technical reports support legal claims and clarify factual issues for negotiation or court presentation. Coordinating with these professionals early ensures that necessary analyses are completed on an expedited schedule and helps avoid surprises during later stages of dispute resolution. The goal is to build a clear and persuasive factual record tailored to the chosen strategy.
After establishing the factual and legal foundation, we attempt negotiation or mediation to resolve disputes efficiently when appropriate. This stage prioritizes solutions that limit cost and time while securing enforceable agreements. We evaluate settlement proposals, prepare negotiation positions, and recommend creative remedies that address both legal claims and practical concerns. If contract provisions require arbitration or mediation, we follow those procedures and advocate for terms that protect client interests and provide finality without prolonged litigation when a fair resolution is achievable.
Negotiation focuses on assessing risk, identifying priorities, and proposing terms that resolve disputes quickly. We prepare settlement offers that reflect both legal exposure and client goals, and we negotiate to reach agreements that address financial, title, and practical concerns. Settlement documents are drafted to ensure enforceability and to prevent future disputes. In Temecula transactions, effective negotiation often restores the parties’ ability to proceed with sales or use of property without the delay and expense of a full trial.
Mediation provides a structured forum for parties to reach voluntary agreements with the help of a neutral mediator, while arbitration offers a binding decision by an arbitrator. Both methods can be faster and more private than court litigation. We prepare thorough submissions and present evidence persuasively in ADR settings, seeking fair outcomes that resolve disputes definitively. ADR can be a preferred path in Temecula when confidentiality, speed, and reduced cost are priorities and when contractual clauses call for alternate dispute processes.
When settlement or ADR is unsuccessful or inappropriate, we prepare litigation documents and move forward with court proceedings. This stage involves drafting complaints or answers, conducting discovery, filing motions, and preparing for trial with witness preparation and evidence organization. Litigation seeks enforceable judgments such as damages, corrective deeds, or injunctions, depending on the remedy required. We approach trial preparation systematically to present a clear narrative and persuasive evidence to the court or jury while protecting client interests throughout the process.
Discovery allows for formal evidence collection through document requests, depositions, and interrogatories. This process helps establish facts, reveal opposing evidence, and build the record needed for trial or settlement leverage. Coordinating discovery with technical reports and witness statements is important to create a cohesive presentation of the case. In Temecula disputes, thorough discovery can clarify title issues, demonstrate contractual breaches, and quantify damages to support robust legal remedies.
When a case proceeds to trial, we present evidence, examine witnesses, and argue legal issues to seek a favorable judgment. Successful presentation requires organized exhibits, credible witness testimony, and coherent legal theories. After judgment, enforcement steps may be necessary to collect damages, implement corrective deeds, or secure injunctive relief. Post-judgment remedies ensure the practical effect of the court’s decision and help clients obtain the full relief ordered to resolve real estate disputes and restore clear property rights.
Begin by preserving all documents and communications related to the transaction, including escrow instructions, purchase agreements, inspection reports, and any emails or texts with the other party. Contact the escrow company to request a hold on disbursement if there is a legitimate dispute about funds or documents, and document all communications with the escrow officer. Gathering a clear record will help determine contractual obligations and whether the escrow company has complied with its instructions. Next, seek legal guidance to evaluate potential remedies and deadlines. In Temecula, an early assessment can identify whether negotiation, demand letters, or expedited court filings are necessary to protect deposits or enforce contractual terms. A timely legal approach often improves the chances of resolving the dispute with minimal delay or cost.
The time to file a claim for a title defect depends on the nature of the claim and applicable statutes of limitation that apply under California law. Some claims related to breach of contract or fraud may have different limitation periods than quiet title actions. It is important to review the specific facts and legal grounds at issue to determine the correct deadline. Because deadlines can be case-specific, prompt review of title documents and related communications is essential. In Temecula matters, an early consultation helps preserve rights and determine whether immediate filings, such as a quiet title action or claims against a title insurer, are necessary to protect property interests.
Yes, many boundary disputes are resolved without court by obtaining a professional survey and negotiating an agreement with the adjoining owner. Mediation or settlement agreements, coupled with corrected legal descriptions or easements, can provide practical and cost-effective solutions. Resolving the issue cooperatively often preserves neighbor relationships and shortens the timeline compared to litigation. However, when parties cannot agree or when the boundary impacts significant value or use of the property, a quiet title action or court determination may be required. In such cases, legal action establishes the official boundary and provides enforceable clarity for property records in Temecula and Riverside County.
When a seller breaches a purchase agreement, remedies may include specific performance to complete the sale, monetary damages for losses, or return of the buyer’s deposit if the breach justifies rescission. The appropriate remedy depends on contract terms, the nature of the breach, and whether money alone would compensate the injured party. Reviewing the purchase agreement and related communications helps determine available relief. In many instances, parties negotiate settlement terms that address financial losses and practical transfer issues. Mediation or litigation may follow if negotiations stall, and a carefully prepared legal strategy helps secure enforceable remedies that reflect the client’s objectives in Temecula real estate matters.
Mediation is a voluntary process where a neutral mediator helps parties negotiate a mutually acceptable settlement, while arbitration results in a binding decision by an arbitrator who acts like a private judge. Mediation allows for greater flexibility and creative solutions and does not result in a binding decision unless parties agree, whereas arbitration typically ends with a binding award that is enforceable in court. Contract language often dictates whether arbitration or mediation is required, so reviewing agreements in Temecula transactions is important. Mediation can preserve confidentiality and relationships, while arbitration provides finality with more predictable procedures than full court litigation.
A court judgment, such as one issued in a quiet title action, can clear title by resolving competing claims and ordering corrective deeds or the removal of clouding interests. However, the judgment must be properly recorded and any required corrective instruments executed to update public records. Judgment alone may not automatically amend third-party records without following recording procedures. After obtaining a favorable judgment, steps include recording the court order, updating the county recorder’s office, and coordinating with title companies to ensure the title report reflects the cleared status. These follow-up actions in Temecula and Riverside County ensure the title is practically marketable and free of unresolved clouds.
Critical evidence in a purchase agreement dispute includes the signed contract, disclosures, escrow instructions, inspection reports, repair agreements, emails or texts reflecting negotiations, and any addenda or amendments. These documents establish the parties’ obligations and the sequence of events that led to the disagreement. Clear documentation of timelines and compliance with contingencies often determines who has the stronger legal position. Witness statements, agent communications, and financial records can also support claims for damages or specific performance. Organizing these materials early in the Temecula dispute improves the ability to negotiate effectively or present the case convincingly in arbitration or court.
Recovery of attorney fees depends on contract terms and statutory provisions. Some purchase agreements or leases contain clauses that allow the prevailing party to recover attorney fees, while certain California statutes provide fee-shifting in limited contexts. Courts will enforce contractual fee provisions if they are properly drafted and applicable to the dispute. Because the availability of fees can affect settlement leverage and cost-benefit analysis, reviewing agreements for fee provisions is an important early step. In Temecula disputes, understanding potential fee recovery helps clients plan financially and decide whether to pursue negotiation, ADR, or litigation.
Liens can prevent sale or refinancing until they are resolved. A recorded lien attaches to property and typically must be paid, subordinated, or removed through negotiated payoff, lien release, or court action before clear title can be transferred. In Temecula transactions, unresolved liens can delay closings and create exposure for buyers or sellers if not addressed promptly. Resolving lien disputes may involve negotiating with lienholders, obtaining payoffs, or filing actions to challenge invalid liens. Early title review and coordination with title companies help identify liens and determine the most efficient method to clear them before sale or refinancing proceeds.
Specific performance is more likely when the subject property is unique and monetary damages are insufficient to remedy the buyer’s loss. Real estate often meets this standard because land is considered unique, so courts may order specific performance to compel conveyance under a valid purchase agreement. The court will consider fairness, contract terms, and whether the buyer has fulfilled obligations such as deposits and financing contingencies. However, courts weigh equitable factors and may deny specific performance if it would be unjust or impracticable. Evaluating the likelihood of this remedy in Temecula requires careful review of the contract, the parties’ conduct, and applicable California law to determine a viable strategy.
