If your motorcycle purchased or leased in Arden-Arcade repeatedly fails to perform as promised, California lemon law may provide remedies including replacement or repurchase. Law Republic APC represents clients in Sacramento County and understands the local courts and manufacturer procedures that shape these claims. This guide explains how the law applies to motorcycles, what steps to take after repeated defects, and how to preserve records that strengthen a claim. If you live or ride in Arden-Arcade, keeping detailed service histories, purchase documents, and correspondence can make a meaningful difference when pursuing a remedy under state law.
Motorcycle owners in Arden-Arcade face unique challenges when a vehicle repeatedly fails due to defects that impair safety or use. Many riders are unsure how many repair attempts constitute a legal claim, or how to demand a buyback or replacement from a manufacturer. This introduction lays out the basic steps: document every repair visit, note the problems and how they affect riding, and retain all purchase and warranty paperwork. Understanding your rights under California’s lemon law gives you leverage to pursue a fair resolution without unnecessary delay, whether through informal negotiation or a formal claim.
Pursuing a lemon law claim for a motorcycle can return significant value to a rider who has been left with an unreliable or unsafe vehicle. Representation helps ensure that communications with the manufacturer are documented, deadlines under warranty and law are observed, and claims are evaluated against California’s statutory standards. For Arden-Arcade residents, a strategic approach can increase the chances of securing a repurchase, replacement, or cash refund. Additionally, a lawyer can help quantify out-of-pocket expenses such as towing, rental costs, and repair attempts, improving the possibility of a more complete recovery under applicable statutes.
Law Republic APC assists motorcycle owners across California, including Arden-Arcade, with lemon law claims and consumer protections. Our approach emphasizes clear communication, thorough documentation, and persistent negotiation with manufacturers and dealers. We focus on analyzing repair histories, warranty timelines, and the safety impact of defects to determine the best path forward. For riders in Sacramento County, we provide local guidance on how state law applies and what remedies may be available based on the vehicle’s age, mileage, and the number of repair attempts recorded.
California’s lemon law covers motorcycles that suffer repeated defects that substantially impair their use, value, or safety and that persist despite reasonable attempts at repair. For Arden-Arcade residents, the law requires careful consideration of repair records, warranty terms, and whether defects were reported to an authorized dealer. Determining eligibility often hinges on whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to repair the defect and whether the issue substantially affects riding or safety. Clear documentation and prompt reporting to the dealer and manufacturer are essential steps when pursuing a potential claim.
Not every mechanical problem leads to a successful lemon law claim, so understanding how the law evaluates defects is important for Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners. The statute assesses whether the defect is significant, whether it recurs after reasonable repairs, and whether the vehicle remains under warranty. Riders should gather service invoices, repair receipts, correspondence, and notes about how defects affected normal operation. Those records will form the foundation for discussions with the manufacturer and for any formal demand for repurchase, replacement, or other remedies available under California law.
Under California law, a motorcycle may be considered a lemon if it has a substantial defect that persists after reasonable repair attempts and that significantly impairs use or safety. Examples include recurring engine failure, braking problems, persistent electrical faults that cause stalling, or transmission issues that leave the bike unsafe or unusable. The key factors are the severity of the defect, the number of repair attempts or downtime, and whether repairs were conducted by an authorized dealer or service center. Riders should act promptly to document problems and preserve all repair and warranty records for any claim.
A successful motorcycle lemon law claim typically requires establishing the defect’s severity, the number and timing of repair attempts, and the vehicle’s warranty status. The process includes collecting repair invoices, communicating the problem to the dealer and manufacturer, and allowing a reasonable opportunity for repair. If resolution is not achieved, a written demand for repurchase or replacement may be necessary. For Arden-Arcade riders, understanding these procedural steps and adhering to statutory notice requirements increases the chance of a favorable outcome when negotiating with manufacturers or pursuing a formal remedy.
This glossary explains important terms used in motorcycle lemon law claims so Arden-Arcade residents can better understand their rights. Definitions clarify terms such as manufacturer, authorized dealer, substantial impairment, reasonable repair attempts, warranty period, repurchase, and replacement. Familiarity with these phrases helps riders recognize whether their situation aligns with statutory criteria and what documentation will be persuasive. Accurate terminology supports effective communication with manufacturers and can reduce confusion during settlement negotiations or court proceedings in Sacramento County.
Substantial impairment refers to a defect that significantly diminishes a motorcycle’s use, value, or safety. For Arden-Arcade riders, this could mean problems that cause frequent breakdowns, interfere with safe operation, or reduce the motorcycle’s market value. Determining substantial impairment involves considering how the defect affects day-to-day riding, commuter reliability, or the safety of the rider. Clear records showing repeated failures, safety hazards, or lost use contribute to demonstrating that a defect rises to the level required by California’s lemon law protections.
An authorized dealer is a service center or retail location recognized by the motorcycle manufacturer to perform warranty repairs and record service history. For Arden-Arcade riders, taking a defective motorcycle to an authorized dealer preserves warranty rights and creates the repair records that support a lemon law claim. Using unauthorized shops may complicate a claim unless the manufacturer accepted those repairs or performed follow-up service. Documentation from an authorized dealer is often heavily weighted when assessing whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to fix the defect.
Reasonable repair attempts describe the number and scope of service visits the manufacturer or dealer must be given to fix a recurring defect before a claim can proceed. In Arden-Arcade claims, this typically involves multiple documented service visits for the same issue or extended periods during which the motorcycle is out of service. What constitutes reasonable depends on the defect’s nature and effect on safety or use. Detailed invoices, service notes, and timelines showing repeated failed repairs help establish that reasonable attempts occurred without resolving the problem.
Remedies under California’s lemon law may include repurchase of the defective motorcycle, replacement with a comparable vehicle, or a cash settlement that reflects the diminished value and out-of-pocket expenses. For Arden-Arcade riders, the appropriate remedy depends on the defect severity, the history of repairs, and statutory calculations for refunds or replacements. Proper documentation of costs, lost use, and safety concerns supports negotiations with manufacturers and can influence whether a repurchase, replacement, or monetary settlement is achieved.
Motorcycle owners in Arden-Arcade can pursue informal resolution with the manufacturer, demand repurchase or replacement under lemon law, or file a formal claim in civil court. Informal negotiation may resolve minor disputes quickly but can fail without clear documentation. A lemon law demand leverages statutory remedies available in California, often producing more robust outcomes when repair histories support the claim. Filing a lawsuit is sometimes necessary when negotiations break down. Choosing the right approach depends on the defect’s nature, the repair record, and the rider’s goals for resolution.
A limited approach focusing on dealer-level repair may be suitable when defects are minor, isolated, and resolved quickly during a single service visit. For Arden-Arcade riders, problems like a lone electrical malfunction that is corrected on first repair and does not recur may not warrant a full lemon law demand. Document the repair and monitor the issue carefully. If the defect returns or continues to affect safety or use, escalate the matter to the manufacturer or pursue statutory remedies under California’s lemon law framework.
A limited approach can also be reasonable when the defect is corrected promptly within the warranty period and the motorcycle returns to reliable operation. Arden-Arcade riders whose bikes are fixed in a timely fashion with no recurring problems may prefer this path to avoid protracted negotiation. Still, retain service records and receipts in case the defect recurs or the remedy proves temporary. Keeping full documentation preserves options for later action if further issues arise that indicate a larger pattern of failure.
Comprehensive representation is advisable when defects reappear after multiple repair attempts or when issues compromise rider safety. For Arden-Arcade residents, repeated stalling, brake failure, or persistent electrical faults that affect operation are signs a broader legal approach is necessary. A comprehensive strategy includes compiling a full repair and communication history, preparing statutory demands, and negotiating for repurchase, replacement, or monetary relief. This approach ensures statutory rights are asserted effectively and helps maximize potential recovery under California law.
When a manufacturer denies responsibility or offers an inadequate remedy, Arden-Arcade riders benefit from a comprehensive legal approach to enforce rights under the lemon law. Documentation of repeated repairs, safety issues, and out-of-pocket costs supports formal demands for repurchase or replacement. Comprehensive representation also manages communications with the manufacturer and, if needed, prepares for litigation to secure a fair outcome. This path helps ensure procedural requirements are met and promotes consistent, informed negotiation toward a statutory remedy.
A comprehensive approach leverages detailed documentation, strategic negotiation, and legal procedures to pursue the fullest remedy available under California law. For Arden-Arcade riders, that approach can translate into a higher likelihood of repurchase or replacement offers that reflect true loss of value and out-of-pocket expenses. Thorough preparation also reduces the risk of missed deadlines or procedural missteps that could weaken a claim. Coordinated representation ensures the rider’s interests remain front and center during discussions with the manufacturer and in any formal proceeding.
Comprehensive representation also addresses related financial impacts, such as reimbursement for towing, rental transportation, and repair bills that were not resolved by the manufacturer. For motorcycle owners in Arden-Arcade, seeking a complete assessment of damages helps frame settlement demands that reflect both economic loss and diminished value. A detailed presentation of facts and supporting documents strengthens negotiating leverage and can produce quicker, fairer resolutions without protracted court battles when manufacturers recognize the validity of the claim.
Pursuing a comprehensive claim helps ensure riders in Arden-Arcade seek reimbursement for out-of-pocket expenses such as repairs, rentals, towing, and diminished vehicle value. Detailed documentation of these costs supports a demand that fully addresses financial impacts caused by a defective motorcycle. Presenting a clear accounting of expenses and lost use increases the likelihood that a manufacturer will offer a settlement or repurchase that meaningfully addresses the rider’s losses under California’s consumer protection framework.
A comprehensive approach also protects riders by emphasizing safety concerns and ensuring those issues are documented and addressed. For Arden-Arcade bikers, highlighting how defects affected control, braking, or engine performance can influence the urgency with which manufacturers respond. This method focuses attention on consumer rights under state law and seeks remedies that prevent future harm by removing unreliable vehicles from service or obtaining appropriate compensation.
Keep a meticulous log of every service visit, including dates, symptoms reported, the dealer’s diagnosis, and repair invoices. For Arden-Arcade riders pursuing a lemon law claim, those records form the backbone of any demand or negotiation with a manufacturer. Also retain emails, written estimates, and notes from phone calls. If issues involve safety, include descriptions of incidents or near-misses. This documentation helps establish patterns of failure, demonstrates the manufacturer had an opportunity to repair, and aids in calculating out-of-pocket expenses tied to the defect.
Retain all purchase documents, lease agreements, and warranty paperwork in a single file for easy access. These documents define the boundaries of coverage, warranty periods, and what remedies may be available under California law. Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners should also save receipts for any repairs paid out of pocket and any related transportation expenses. A complete paper trail makes it easier to calculate damages and supports a cohesive claim when negotiating with the manufacturer or preparing a formal demand.
Riders turn to lemon law claims when defects interfere with reliable transportation, safety, or the motorcycle’s resale value. In Arden-Arcade, a recurring mechanical or electrical issue that leaves the bike unsafe or frequently out of service often prompts formal action. Seeking a remedy under California law can secure repurchase, replacement, or financial compensation that reflects real loss. Early evaluation of repair records and warranty status helps determine whether a musical approach or a formal demand will best address the problem and restore confidence in the rider’s vehicle.
Another reason to consider the service is to obtain reimbursement for additional expenses incurred due to the defect, including towing, rental transportation, and emergency repairs. Arden-Arcade motorcyclists may also pursue claims to remove an unsafe vehicle from the road and to hold manufacturers accountable for repeated failures. Taking prompt, documented steps preserves legal options and increases the prospects of a fair settlement or statutory remedy under California’s statutes governing defective vehicles.
Several recurring circumstances often trigger lemon law claims. These include persistent engine or transmission failures, repeated electrical problems that cause stalling, brake or steering defects that compromise safety, and repeated failures after authorized repairs. In Arden-Arcade, climate and commuting demands can expose mechanical issues that may not emerge elsewhere. When such defects interfere with use or safety despite multiple repair attempts, pursuing remedies under state law becomes a compelling option to secure a replacement, repurchase, or monetary relief.
Engine or transmission defects that persist despite repeated repairs often justify pursuing a lemon law claim. Arden-Arcade riders experiencing frequent stalling, loss of power, or transmission malfunction that reoccurs after service should document each repair attempt and the symptoms experienced while riding. These records help establish a pattern of failure and support demands for manufacturer action. When defects affect reliability and safety on local roads, seeking a statutory remedy can lead to repurchase, replacement, or compensation that addresses the loss of value.
Defects that directly impact safety, such as faulty brakes, steering issues, or recurring electrical malfunctions, often require firm legal action if not cured by repairs. For Arden-Arcade motorcyclists, maintaining safe operation is essential, and defects that create hazardous riding conditions should be documented and reported promptly. Repeated repair attempts that fail to resolve safety-related problems strengthen the basis for a lemon law claim and increase the likelihood that a manufacturer will agree to repurchase or replace the defective motorcycle.
When a motorcycle spends extended periods in the shop and the owner loses reliable transportation, a claim for lost use and associated costs may be appropriate. Arden-Arcade riders who experience prolonged downtime due to repeated repairs should track dates out of service, transportation expenses, and the impact on daily life. This documentation contributes to calculating damages and supports a demand for compensation or repurchase that reflects both monetary loss and diminished use of the vehicle under California law.
Law Republic APC provides focused guidance to Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners dealing with persistent defects and manufacturer disputes. We help clients collect the necessary documentation, evaluate repair histories, and pursue statutory remedies when appropriate. Our aim is to resolve matters efficiently while protecting safety and financial interests. If you live in Sacramento County and are facing repeated mechanical failures, contact us to review your case, understand the likely options under California law, and determine the best path toward a fair outcome.
Clients come to Law Republic APC for clear guidance and dedicated representation when dealing with manufacturers and dealer repair histories. For Arden-Arcade riders, our approach focuses on documenting facts, articulating legal claims under California law, and pursuing a resolution that addresses safety concerns and financial loss. We assist in preparing statutory demands and negotiating with manufacturers while keeping clients informed about likely outcomes and procedural steps. This service helps riders make informed decisions about whether to accept an offer or pursue further action.
Our team prioritizes practical solutions tailored to each client’s situation, including securing repurchase, replacement, or appropriate compensation when the repair record supports those remedies. Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners benefit from a methodical review of repair invoices, warranty documents, and service timelines. We also help quantify economic loss, track out-of-pocket expenses, and prepare the documentation that strengthens negotiations or a formal claim under state law.
Communication and responsiveness are central to our approach, ensuring that clients in Arden-Arcade understand the status of their case and the options available at each step. We assist with statutory notices, coordinate with manufacturers when appropriate, and prepare for escalation if necessary. For riders seeking a fair resolution after repeated defects, this support helps navigate legal and procedural requirements and preserves the best possible chance of a favorable outcome.
Our process begins with a thorough review of purchase documents, warranty terms, and repair records to assess eligibility under California’s lemon law. For Arden-Arcade riders, we then advise on next steps, including sending statutory demands, negotiating with manufacturers, and preparing for possible litigation if necessary. Throughout, we prioritize preserving evidence, meeting deadlines, and pursuing remedies that address financial loss and safety concerns. Clear communication guides clients through each stage so decisions are informed and timely.
The initial step involves collecting all relevant purchase and repair documents and recording the timeline of issues. For Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners, this includes invoices, service logs, warranty paperwork, and any communication with dealers or manufacturers. We review these materials to determine whether the defects meet statutory criteria for a lemon law claim and to identify potential remedies. This organized foundation is essential to prepare a persuasive demand and to estimate likely outcomes.
Collecting detailed repair histories is essential because each service visit builds the factual basis for a claim. Arden-Arcade riders should provide copies of every invoice, work order, and dealer communication related to the defect. Notes about symptoms while riding and the impact on safety or use are also important. These documents enable a comprehensive analysis of whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to repair and whether statutory remedies should be sought under California law.
Reviewing the warranty terms and purchase or lease agreement clarifies coverage, disclaimers, and timeframes for claims. For Arden-Arcade owners, understanding what the manufacturer promised and when those promises expire is critical for determining available remedies. This review identifies statutory notice requirements and any potential defenses a manufacturer might raise, enabling a tailored strategy for negotiation or formal demand under the state’s lemon law provisions.
After document review, the next step typically involves presenting a formal demand to the manufacturer seeking repurchase, replacement, or compensation. For Arden-Arcade residents, this demand summarizes repair history, safety impacts, and the legal basis for relief under California law. Negotiations follow, with documentation used to support the claim and to counter manufacturer positions. The goal is to achieve a fair resolution without court intervention, while preserving the ability to escalate if the manufacturer’s offers are insufficient.
Preparing a statutory demand letter involves outlining repair attempts, attaching supporting documents, and specifying the remedy sought. For Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners, a clear, well-supported demand invites meaningful negotiation and signals readiness to pursue statutory protections. The letter typically requests repurchase or replacement and may propose a timeline for response. Accurate documentation and precise descriptions of the defect and its impact enhance the credibility of the demand during settlement discussions.
Negotiations with the manufacturer focus on securing a resolution that compensates for defects, lost use, and out-of-pocket expenses. Arden-Arcade riders should expect positions from both sides and prepare to document costs and safety impacts to support settlement demands. The negotiation process can result in repurchase offers, replacement proposals, or monetary settlements that reflect diminished value. If settlement talks stall, the case may proceed to litigation or alternate dispute resolution to enforce statutory rights.
If negotiations do not yield a fair outcome, pursuing a formal civil claim may become necessary to secure statutory remedies. For Arden-Arcade motorcycle owners, litigation involves filing claims in the appropriate court, presenting evidence of repeated failures and repair attempts, and seeking repurchase, replacement, or damages. This step preserves the right to a judicial determination of the claim and can motivate manufacturers to settle when faced with a well-documented case prepared for trial.
Filing a formal claim requires assembling the evidence, drafting pleadings, and preparing to prove that the motorcycle meets statutory criteria for a lemon. Arden-Arcade riders should expect pretrial discovery, depositions, and evidentiary hearings where service records, witness statements, and expert testimony about mechanical issues may be considered. Thorough preparation increases the likelihood of a favorable judgment or an improved settlement offer before trial concludes.
As cases progress, many disputes resolve through settlement, but judgments awarding repurchase, replacement, or monetary compensation are also possible. For Arden-Arcade clients, obtaining a judgment enforces statutory rights and compels the manufacturer to provide remedies. Enforcement mechanisms ensure the manufacturer complies with any court-ordered repurchase or payment. Post-resolution support includes ensuring proper title transfers, calculating refunds, and documenting the closure of the matter for the client’s records.
A motorcycle may qualify as a lemon when it has a substantial defect that impairs use, safety, or value and that remains after reasonable repair attempts. For Arden-Arcade riders, this means documenting repeated repair visits, the defect’s impact on riding, and whether the motorcycle is still under warranty. Authorized dealer repair records and warranty documents are key to establishing eligibility under California law. Acting promptly to preserve records and report defects increases the chances of a successful claim. If the documented repairs do not resolve the defect and the problem substantially affects the motorcycle’s operation or safety, a statutory demand or formal claim may be appropriate. Gathering service invoices, purchase or lease agreements, and correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer helps build a persuasive case. Local courts in Sacramento County will consider these records when evaluating remedies such as repurchase, replacement, or monetary compensation.
There is no fixed number of repair attempts that automatically creates a lemon law claim; instead, California law looks at whether the manufacturer had a reasonable opportunity to repair a substantial defect. For Arden-Arcade riders, several documented repair attempts for the same issue or prolonged periods of downtime can satisfy this requirement. The nature of the defect and how it affects safety or use influence whether repair attempts are deemed reasonable. Riders should keep detailed records of each visit and the time the motorcycle spent out of service. If multiple attempts fail to correct the problem, a formal demand to the manufacturer is often the next step. Consulting with counsel early helps evaluate whether the number and nature of repairs support a statutory claim in Sacramento County.
California’s motorcycle lemon law covers defects that substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety. Typical covered issues include persistent engine or transmission failures, recurring electrical faults that cause stalling, and brake or steering problems that create unsafe riding conditions. For Arden-Arcade riders, defects that recur despite authorized repairs and that materially affect normal operation or safety are likely candidates for a claim. Damage from accidents, neglect, or unauthorized modifications generally falls outside the lemon law. However, if a defect arises during normal use and remains unresolved by the manufacturer’s authorized repair process, it may be covered. Preserving repair records and warranty documents is essential to demonstrate coverage under the statute.
Yes, reimbursement for reasonable out-of-pocket expenses related to the defect, such as towing, rental transportation, and certain repair costs, may be included in a lemon law recovery. For Arden-Arcade riders, keeping receipts and logs of additional expenses incurred while the motorcycle was being repaired strengthens a demand for reimbursement. These costs can be itemized and presented during negotiations or in a formal claim to ensure they are considered as part of the remedy. Documenting dates out of service, alternative transportation costs, and receipts for emergency repairs is important. A thorough accounting of these expenses helps calculate the financial impact of the defect and supports a settlement or court-ordered remedy that addresses both direct damages and diminished value.
Before contacting a lawyer, gather all purchase or lease agreements, warranty paperwork, repair invoices, dealer work orders, and any communication with the dealer or manufacturer. For Arden-Arcade riders, notes about the motorcycle’s symptoms, dates of incidents, and any safety concerns are also valuable. Photographs, videos of the defect occurring, and records of downtime or transportation costs further strengthen a claim. This documentation enables a prompt evaluation of whether the motorcycle meets statutory criteria under California law. Having a well-organized file speeds up the assessment, clarifies the repair timeline, and helps counsel advise on the best path forward, whether that involves negotiation or a more formal legal process.
The length of a motorcycle lemon law claim varies depending on the complexity of the defect, the manufacturer’s responsiveness, and whether the matter resolves through negotiation or requires litigation. In many cases, negotiations can yield a resolution in a matter of weeks to months if the documentation is strong and the manufacturer is responsive. For Arden-Arcade clients, early preparation and clear evidence of repeated repairs often expedite settlement discussions. If negotiation fails and litigation is necessary, the process can take longer, potentially several months to a year or more depending on court schedules and discovery demands. Consulting with counsel early helps set realistic expectations about timelines and strategies to pursue the most efficient resolution consistent with the client’s goals.
Pursuing a lemon law claim should not negatively affect motorcycle insurance as long as the claim concerns defects covered by warranty and not accident-related damage. For Arden-Arcade riders, keeping claims focused on manufacturer responsibility for defects generally does not impact personal insurance policies. Insurance matters involving accidents or negligence remain separate from warranty-based claims against a manufacturer. Selling a motorcycle that was the subject of a lemon law claim may require disclosure of prior issues depending on local resale rules and buyer inquiries. Proper documentation of the resolution, including any repurchase, replacement, or repair history, helps clarify the motorcycle’s condition for future transactions and protects the owner’s interests during resale.
If the dealer fixes a defect but it returns later, document the recurrence and continue to record repair attempts and outcomes. For Arden-Arcade riders, repeated failure after apparent repair strengthens a claim that the problem is persistent and not adequately remedied. Each instance should be reported to an authorized dealer and documented to show a pattern of recurrence that supports a lemon law demand under California statutes. Maintaining a timeline of repairs, notes about how the defect affected riding after each repair, and correspondence with the dealer helps demonstrate that the manufacturer had repeated opportunities to correct the issue. This record supports demands for repurchase, replacement, or compensation when the defect persists.
Lemon law protections most commonly apply to new motorcycles still under the manufacturer’s warranty, but used motorcycles may also qualify in certain circumstances, such as those still covered by a transferable warranty or dealer warranty. For Arden-Arcade riders, it is important to review warranty terms and whether coverage applies to the current owner. If a defect emerges while the motorcycle remains under warranty, the statutory remedies may still be available regardless of prior ownership, depending on the warranty language and state law requirements. Even if a motorcycle is used, regular documentation of repairs and warranty coverage remains critical. Consulting counsel to review the warranty and the repair history clarifies whether the situation merits a lemon law claim and what remedies may be pursued under California law.
Costs to pursue a motorcycle lemon law claim vary depending on whether the matter resolves through negotiation or requires litigation. Many firms handle lemon law matters on contingency or offer clear fee arrangements that align counsel’s incentives with client outcomes. For Arden-Arcade riders, discussing fee structures and potential expenses upfront helps set expectations about the financial commitment required to pursue the claim. Transparent fee arrangements ensure clients understand how costs will be handled during negotiation or trial. Even when litigation becomes necessary, recoverable remedies under California law can include reimbursement for certain fees and expenses, depending on statutory provisions and case facts. Early consultation helps evaluate the likely cost-benefit balance of pursuing a claim and identifies potential avenues to seek recovery for legal costs within the overall settlement or judgment.
