If you were hurt on someone else’s property in Arroyo Grande, California, pursuing a premises liability claim can help you recover for medical bills, lost income, and pain and suffering. Law Republic APC assists people injured in slip and fall incidents, dog attacks, inadequate security events, and other hazardous conditions on private and commercial property. This guide explains how premises liability works locally, what steps to take after an injury, and how the firm approaches gathering evidence, documenting losses, and negotiating with insurers. We aim to make the legal process understandable and to protect your rights after an accident on another party’s property.
Arroyo Grande residents face unique risks from coastal weather, public walkways, and older buildings that may contribute to hazardous conditions. After an injury, prompt action preserves important evidence and creates a stronger record for a claim. This includes seeking medical care, reporting the incident to property management or local authorities when appropriate, and preserving photographs and witness information. At Law Republic APC we help clients in San Luis Obispo County identify potential liability, evaluate insurance coverage, and pursue fair financial recovery. We can explain likely timelines and practical next steps so you know what to expect as your claim moves forward.
Holding property owners and managers accountable for unsafe conditions promotes safer public spaces and helps individuals who have suffered injuries recover financially. A successful premises liability claim can reimburse medical expenses, compensate for lost wages, and address long-term care needs. Beyond compensation, pursuing a claim often leads to corrective measures that reduce the risk of future incidents for others. In Arroyo Grande, where small businesses and older residential properties are common, legal action can be particularly effective at encouraging repairs, improved signage, or revised maintenance practices that protect the local community and individual claimants alike.
Law Republic APC represents individuals in personal injury, real estate, and lemon law matters across California, including Arroyo Grande and San Luis Obispo County. Our approach emphasizes careful investigation, timely evidence collection, and clear communication with clients about options and likely outcomes. We work to identify negligent parties, preserve documentation such as surveillance or maintenance records, and engage with insurers to pursue fair settlements. Our team focuses on practical strategies that protect clients’ rights while seeking resolution that addresses medical, financial, and emotional impacts of an injury sustained on another party’s property.
Premises liability covers claims where property owners or occupiers fail to maintain safe conditions, and that failure causes injury. In Arroyo Grande, common scenarios include wet floors at local businesses, uneven walkways, poorly lit parking areas, or unsecured pools and balconies. To establish a claim, an injured person typically must show that a dangerous condition existed, that the property owner knew or should have known about it, and that the condition led to the injury. Local ordinances and California law shape these standards, so understanding the specific facts and applicable rules is essential for building a strong case.
Investigating a premises liability case often involves collecting incident reports, photos, witness statements, and maintenance logs that demonstrate how long a hazard existed. Medical records link the injury to the incident and document treatment needs. Insurance companies will evaluate these elements when considering liability and damages. In Arroyo Grande, factors such as seasonal weather, nearby construction, or property ownership structures can affect liability and fault allocation. Early preservation of evidence and a strategic plan for presenting the claim improve the likelihood of fair compensation for medical care, rehabilitation, wage losses, and other measurable harms.
Premises liability refers to the legal responsibility of property owners and occupiers to keep their premises reasonably safe for invitees and guests. In California, that duty differs depending on the visitor’s status, with invitees typically owed the highest level of care. In Arroyo Grande, courts consider factors like visibility of the hazard, prior complaints, and steps the property owner took to remedy dangerous conditions. The definition encompasses a wide range of incidents, from falls in grocery stores to injuries from inadequate security in parking areas. Understanding how the law applies locally helps injured parties identify potential avenues for recovery and build persuasive claims.
A successful premises liability claim generally requires proof of the dangerous condition, notice to the property owner, and a causal link between that condition and the injury. Gathering these elements involves documenting the scene, securing witness accounts, and obtaining maintenance and inspection records. Medical evidence is used to show the severity and treatment of injuries. Once facts are assembled, claims are presented to insurers or pursued in court if necessary. Negotiation, demand letters, and possible litigation are common processes, and each stage benefits from an organized presentation of damages and liability to support a fair resolution.
Below are common terms you may encounter during a premises liability matter in Arroyo Grande. Understanding these words helps you follow correspondence, reports, and legal pleadings as your claim develops. The glossary covers visitor classifications, notice standards, contributory conduct, and types of damages. Familiarity with these concepts provides clarity when reviewing incident reports, insurance responses, and legal advice. If any term remains unclear, asking for an explanation tailored to your case will ensure you can make informed decisions throughout the claim process and better understand how particular facts affect outcomes.
An invitee is a person who is on property for the owner’s business purposes or with the owner’s consent where the owner expects public patronage. Examples include customers at a store or patrons at a restaurant in Arroyo Grande. Property owners owe invitees a duty to inspect for and repair hazards and to provide warnings about known dangers. The obligations include taking reasonable steps to keep common areas safe and addressing conditions that the owner should have discovered through regular maintenance. Invitee status is important because it affects how courts evaluate the owner’s duty and potential liability for injuries.
Notice refers to a property owner’s actual or constructive awareness of a dangerous condition. Actual notice means the owner or manager knew about the hazard, while constructive notice means the condition existed long enough that the owner should have found and fixed it through reasonable inspection. In Arroyo Grande claims, maintenance logs, prior complaints, and surveillance footage can demonstrate notice. Showing notice is a central part of many premises liability cases because it supports the argument that the property owner had an opportunity to address the hazard but failed to do so.
A licensee is a person who is allowed on property for their own purposes, with permission from the owner, but not for the owner’s benefit. Social guests or neighbors with permission to visit are common examples. Property owners owe licensees a duty to warn of known dangers that the licensee might not discover, but generally do not have the same broad duty to inspect and repair as they do for invitees. Determining visitor status can affect liability and compensation amounts in Arroyo Grande claims, so understanding whether an injured person was an invitee, licensee, or trespasser is important for legal strategy.
Comparative fault is a legal rule that apportions responsibility between an injured person and other parties when multiple actors share blame for an incident. In California, a plaintiff’s recovery can be reduced by their percentage of fault rather than barred entirely. For example, if an Arroyo Grande visitor is found partly responsible for not observing a hazard, their compensation can be adjusted accordingly. This doctrine requires careful evidence of conduct and causation so that fault allocation accurately reflects each party’s role in causing the injury and resulting damages.
After an incident in Arroyo Grande you may consider a limited approach such as filing a small claim, a demand to an insurer, or seeking a quick settlement, or a more comprehensive approach involving full litigation, formal discovery, and court filings. A limited approach can be faster and less costly but may yield lower compensation when damages are significant or liability is contested. A comprehensive claim often involves a deeper investigation and stronger leverage in negotiations, particularly where the insurer disputes responsibility or the injuries require long-term treatment. Choosing between these options depends on your losses, available evidence, and tolerance for a longer process.
A limited claim can be effective when liability is obvious and medical costs are relatively modest so that a swift settlement covers expenses and avoids lengthy proceedings. For example, if documented maintenance records show recent attention to the area and an obvious hazard still caused a minor injury with brief medical treatment, pursuing a quick insurer demand may resolve the matter efficiently. In Arroyo Grande circumstances where the incident was witnessed, photographed, and treated promptly, the limited track can preserve resources while providing fair restitution for immediate out-of-pocket losses and short-term recovery needs.
When medical bills are low and ongoing care is unlikely, a direct negotiation or settlement demand can save time and legal costs. If an injury requires a single emergency visit or simple outpatient care, and the value of the claim is within a manageable range for a quick resolution, focusing on an efficient settlement may be sensible. In Arroyo Grande, practical considerations like travel for treatment, lost workdays, and immediate out-of-pocket expenses guide this decision. Prompt documentation and a clear presentation of damages increase the chance of a successful limited claim outcome.
When injuries require extended medical care, rehabilitation, or have potential long-term effects, a comprehensive claim helps ensure future needs are considered in valuation. Pursuing thorough documentation, expert medical opinions, and structured negotiation strategies helps capture both current and anticipated losses. In Arroyo Grande cases involving serious harm, the additional time and expense of thorough investigation and possible litigation can be necessary to obtain compensation that reflects the full impact on earning capacity, daily life, and future care costs. This approach prioritizes a comprehensive recovery rather than a rapid, limited settlement.
When property owners or insurers dispute responsibility, or when multiple parties may share fault, more robust legal action is often required. This includes formal discovery to obtain maintenance records, communications, and surveillance, and careful coordination of evidence against several defendants. In Arroyo Grande, properties can have complex ownership or management arrangements that make liability less straightforward. A comprehensive approach helps identify responsible parties, allocate fault appropriately, and pursue outcomes that account for all sources of compensation available to the injured person.
A comprehensive approach often produces a more complete recovery by accounting for future medical needs, lost earning capacity, and non-economic harms such as pain and reduced quality of life. When the full scope of injuries may reveal itself over time, thorough documentation and careful negotiation ensure those future losses are not overlooked. In Arroyo Grande situations involving significant injury or disputed facts, investing in a detailed investigation and negotiation strategy increases the likelihood that settlement or judgment reflects the real costs and burdens the injured person will face going forward.
Comprehensive claims bring added procedural tools like subpoenas, depositions, and expert testimony that can secure crucial evidence and clarify liability issues. These tools are especially valuable when maintenance records are withheld or when the opposing side minimizes the severity of injuries. In Arroyo Grande, using a full range of legal measures can also pressure insurers to propose fair settlements rather than lowball offers. The process is designed to be thorough and to present a clear, supported case for the compensation needed to address both immediate and long-term consequences of the injury.
A comprehensive approach seeks to quantify all categories of damage, including past and future medical care, lost wages, diminished earning capacity, and non-economic losses. By compiling medical records, expert opinions where necessary, and detailed documentation of economic impacts, the claim aims to reflect the true cost of the injury. In Arroyo Grande, this thorough valuation helps prevent settlements that only address immediate bills while leaving long-term needs unaddressed. Pursuing a full assessment increases the chance of obtaining funds that cover both current recovery and future challenges.
When a claim is supported by organized evidence, clear medical documentation, and a strategic presentation of damages, it strengthens the injured party’s position in negotiations with insurers and defendants. Demonstrating thorough preparation reduces the likelihood of low first offers and increases pressure to reach a fair settlement. In Arroyo Grande matters where liability is disputed, a detailed record demonstrates seriousness and readiness to pursue litigation if necessary, often resulting in better settlement outcomes and fewer concessions that could leave future needs uncompensated.
After an injury, taking comprehensive photos and videos of the scene, the hazard, and surrounding conditions preserves evidence that may otherwise disappear. Capture wide shots and close-ups that show the hazard’s relation to walkways, signage, or lighting. Record timestamps when possible and note weather conditions and any obstructions. Gather contact information for witnesses and obtain incident reports or statements from property management or security. This immediate documentation strengthens your position by creating a reliable record of the conditions that led to your injury and helps reconstruct the event later if records are lost or altered.
Witness statements add credibility to your account and help corroborate details that may be disputed later. Secure names, phone numbers, and brief accounts while memories are fresh, and ask witnesses to describe what they observed about the hazard and your fall. If a business prepares an incident report, request a copy and note the name of the person who completed it. In Arroyo Grande, witnesses may include nearby patrons, employees, or neighbors, and their accounts can be especially valuable when surveillance footage is not available or has been overwritten.
If your injury required medical care, caused lost wages, or diminished your ability to work or enjoy daily activities, seeking compensation through a premises liability claim can address those losses and help with recovery. Claims also encourage property owners to fix hazards, which can prevent future injuries to others. Legal action can be appropriate when an owner failed to maintain safe premises, ignored prior complaints, or lacked adequate security measures. Evaluating the strength of your case and potential recovery helps determine if pursuing a claim is a practical step toward financial and personal restoration after an accident in Arroyo Grande.
Beyond immediate financial considerations, a claim can secure resources for ongoing medical care and rehabilitation that might not be covered by other means. It can also create accountability where negligent practices or maintenance lapses persist. For community members in Arroyo Grande, holding property owners responsible for preventable hazards supports broader public safety. Each case is unique, so assessing evidence, insurance coverage, and the likely costs of recovery versus potential compensation will inform whether filing a claim is the appropriate course of action.
Typical incidents include slip and fall accidents caused by wet floors or uneven surfaces, injuries from broken stairs or handrails, assaults or injuries in poorly lit parking areas, and incidents involving negligent maintenance like torn carpeting or unsecured rugs. Dog bites and injuries from defective property fixtures also give rise to claims. In Arroyo Grande, seasonal storms, older building stock, and tourism-related foot traffic can contribute to hazardous conditions. When such circumstances result in injury, documenting the facts and identifying responsible parties is the first step toward pursuing recovery.
Slip and fall incidents commonly occur where spills are not cleaned promptly, floor surfaces lack traction, or walkways have uneven paving. These hazards are frequent at stores, restaurants, and public walkways. Documentation such as photographs, employee statements, and maintenance logs showing inadequate inspection procedures helps establish the owner’s duty and notice of the condition. Timely medical records linking the fall to injuries and witness accounts greatly strengthen a claim. In Arroyo Grande, attention to local weather and maintenance practices is important when assessing liability for such falls.
Poorly lit parking lots, unlocked gates, or insufficient security measures can create conditions where assaults or trips and falls occur. When a property owner knew or should have known about safety risks and failed to take reasonable steps, they may be held liable. Evidence like prior incident reports, neighbor complaints, or the absence of functional lighting supports a claim. In Arroyo Grande, properties near nightlife, public venues, or transit areas may require proactive safety measures, and their absence can be a significant factor in premises liability cases.
Injuries from broken handrails, collapsed stairs, unsecured shelving, or malfunctioning elevators arise from poor maintenance and repair practices. Showing that maintenance schedules were not followed, repairs were delayed, or the owner ignored warning signs can establish liability. In commercial settings, vendor or contractor records may also be relevant for proving responsibility. For Arroyo Grande residents, older buildings or seasonal wear can exacerbate these risks, making documentation of inspection routines and repair histories essential to a strong claim.
Law Republic APC is available to discuss premises liability incidents that occurred in Arroyo Grande and to explain potential options for pursuing compensation. We listen to the facts, review available evidence, and outline realistic pathways for recovery so you can make informed decisions. Our goal is to protect your interests while pursuing financial recovery for medical care, lost income, and other harms. If you or a loved one were injured on another person’s property, contacting the firm promptly helps preserve important evidence and begins the process of documenting your losses and building a persuasive claim.
Clients choose Law Republic APC for clear communication, careful fact-finding, and persistent advocacy in personal injury matters throughout California. We emphasize thorough case preparation, timely preservation of evidence, and practical negotiation strategies with insurers to pursue fair compensation. For Arroyo Grande residents, we combine knowledge of local conditions with an approach that centers the injured person’s medical and financial needs. Our work focuses on explaining options and supporting clients through each step, from initial investigation to settlement or litigation if necessary.
We help clients assemble medical records, witness statements, and property documentation to present a coherent case to insurers or in court. This includes coordinating with treating providers to document treatment plans and anticipated needs, and obtaining records that show prior complaints or maintenance lapses. In Arroyo Grande matters, this careful documentation often distinguishes stronger claims from weaker ones and aids in negotiations that reflect both immediate and long-term impacts of injuries. Clear goals and consistent client updates are central to our approach.
Throughout the claims process we aim to relieve administrative burdens on injured people so they can concentrate on recovery. We handle communications with insurers, gather necessary evidence, and advocate for assessments that account for future treatment and other ongoing needs. For people in Arroyo Grande dealing with the aftermath of a premises injury, our role includes explaining potential outcomes, organizing case materials, and striving for a resolution that meets medical and financial recovery goals while keeping clients informed at every stage.
Our process begins with a careful intake to understand the incident, injuries, and relevant documentation. We then pursue preservation of evidence, obtain medical records, and seek witness statements and property reports. After building a factual record, we present a demand to insurers with a detailed calculation of damages and supporting evidence. If a fair resolution is not forthcoming, we prepare for litigation, including drafting pleadings and conducting discovery. Throughout, we provide regular updates and support so you know what to expect at each stage and can make informed decisions.
The initial phase focuses on securing the scene, collecting photographic and documentary evidence, and obtaining medical treatment records that link injuries to the incident. We gather witness contact information, request incident reports from property owners or managers, and seek surveillance footage if available. In Arroyo Grande cases, early action is essential because video and transient physical evidence can be lost quickly. Preserving these materials and establishing a factual timeline helps frame liability and supports later demands or filings with insurers and courts.
Documentation includes photos, videos, and notes describing the hazard, its location, and environmental conditions at the time of the incident. Collecting witness names, statements, and contact information while memories are fresh preserves testimony that may later corroborate your account. If property staff completed an incident report, obtaining that report quickly helps prevent later disputes about details. In Arroyo Grande, prompt documentation is particularly important due to seasonal changes and local activity that can alter or erase evidence.
We request maintenance logs, inspection records, and any internal reports that might show prior knowledge of hazardous conditions. This also includes seeking security footage and communications about repairs or complaints. Early subpoenas or preservation letters can be necessary to prevent destruction or loss of relevant materials. Collecting these records provides a fuller picture of the property’s condition and the owner’s response, which is often central to proving notice and liability in Arroyo Grande premises cases.
After compiling medical documentation and evidence of liability, we prepare a demand package that details the facts, injuries, and damages. The demand outlines medical expenses, lost income, and anticipated future needs alongside supporting records. We then engage insurers in negotiations to seek a fair settlement. This process involves presenting a persuasive case supported by documentation, responding to insurer inquiries, and negotiating terms that address both present and future costs. Effective negotiation often resolves claims without the need for prolonged litigation when the documentation is comprehensive.
The demand package includes a narrative of the incident, photos, witness statements, incident reports, and complete medical records and bills. It also presents a calculation of current and projected losses to justify the requested recovery. Presenting a coherent, well-supported demand helps insurers assess liability and damages accurately and often results in better initial offers. In Arroyo Grande matters, tailoring the demand to local facts, such as property maintenance practices and prior complaints, strengthens the claim and increases the chance of a fair early resolution.
Negotiations involve back-and-forth offers, exchange of documentation, and discussions about the strength of liability and valuation of damages. We advocate for settlements that account for medical recovery and future needs while remaining practical about timing and risk. If discussions stall, we evaluate whether further factual development or formal discovery is needed. In Arroyo Grande cases, a realistic assessment of exposure and careful presentation of damages can prompt insurers to provide reasonable settlements and avoid unnecessary litigation.
If settlement efforts do not yield fair compensation, we prepare for litigation by filing a complaint, engaging in discovery to obtain additional records and testimony, and developing trial materials. This stage can include depositions, expert opinions when necessary, and motions to shape the issues for trial. Litigation seeks to present the strongest possible case to a judge or jury and to secure a judgment that reflects the full extent of damages sustained. Preparation emphasizes credibility, organization, and demonstrable evidence of liability and harm.
Filing a complaint begins the formal court process and allows tools like subpoenas and depositions to gather information otherwise unavailable. Discovery reveals maintenance histories, internal communications, and witness testimony that clarify responsibility. During this period, we work to identify all responsible parties and to secure admissions or documents that demonstrate notice of hazardous conditions. Thorough discovery in Arroyo Grande cases often uncovers critical facts that strengthen the claim and facilitate favorable resolution, whether by settlement or judgment.
Trial preparation includes assembling exhibits, preparing witness testimony, and organizing medical evidence to present a coherent narrative to the court. Witness preparation, demonstrative aids, and clear explanation of damages help jurors or a judge understand the incident’s impact. While many cases resolve before trial, preparing as though a case will go to court signals seriousness and can improve settlement prospects. In Arroyo Grande matters, a well-prepared trial presentation emphasizes the connection between the property condition, notice, and the injuries sustained.
Seek medical attention immediately to address injuries and create a record linking treatment to the incident. Document the scene with photos and videos that show the hazard, environmental conditions, and your injuries. Obtain contact information for witnesses and request an incident report from property staff or management while details remain fresh. Preserving evidence quickly helps prevent loss or alteration of critical materials that support a future claim. After addressing urgent needs, keep all medical records, bills, and receipts related to treatment and recovery costs. Avoid giving detailed recorded statements to insurers without consulting a representative who can advise on how such statements might affect your claim. Seek guidance to ensure your communications protect your rights while you focus on healing and collecting necessary documentation.
In California, the statute of limitations for most personal injury claims, including premises liability, is generally two years from the date of injury, but exceptions can apply depending on circumstances. Failing to file within the applicable deadline can bar recovery, so timely evaluation of your claim is important. Certain governmental defendants may have shorter notice requirements, and those rules differ, so prompt action is essential to protect legal options. Because timelines can vary with the defendant’s identity and facts of the case, consult promptly to confirm applicable deadlines and preserve evidence. Even when liability seems clear, early filing or preservation steps prevent disputes about lost evidence and ensure you retain the full range of legal remedies available under California law.
California follows a comparative fault rule, meaning that recovery may be reduced by the injured person’s percentage of fault rather than barred entirely. If a court finds you partially responsible, your award will be reduced proportionally to reflect your share of fault. This system allows many injured people to recover compensation even when they bear some responsibility for the incident. Accurate evidence and persuasive presentation of the facts are important for minimizing any assigned share of fault. Actions like documenting the scene, securing witness statements, and showing that the property owner neglected maintenance can help demonstrate the greater responsibility of the property owner and reduce the impact of any partial fault assigned to you.
Recoverable damages in a premises liability claim typically include past and future medical expenses, lost wages and loss of earning capacity, and compensation for pain, suffering, and reduced quality of life. Out-of-pocket costs such as transportation to medical appointments, assistive devices, and property damage may also be recoverable. The precise categories and amounts depend on the facts and severity of the injuries and are supported through documentation and medical evidence. To secure appropriate compensation, it is important to maintain complete records of medical treatment, employment impacts, and non-economic losses. Careful valuation of future needs, supported by medical opinions and cost estimates, ensures that potential long-term expenses and impacts on daily life are considered in settlement or trial valuation.
You are not required to give a recorded statement to an insurer, and providing one without guidance can unintentionally harm your claim. Insurance adjusters may request statements early to gather information, but those statements can be used to challenge the severity of injuries or the sequence of events. It is prudent to consult with a representative before making recorded statements so that your answers do not create misunderstandings or admissions that weaken your case. Instead, provide necessary identification and basic incident information and seek advice on whether and how to respond to more detailed inquiries. Having someone review insurer requests and advise on responses helps preserve your rights and ensures communications support, rather than undermine, your claim for fair recovery.
Many personal injury firms handle premises liability claims on a contingency fee basis, which means fees are paid as a percentage of any recovery rather than upfront. This arrangement allows injured people to pursue claims without immediate out-of-pocket legal fees. Costs for investigation, expert opinions, and court filings may be advanced and deducted under the terms of the agreement, with transparent accounting so you understand financial implications of pursuing the claim. Discuss fee arrangements and potential costs before proceeding so you know how they will be handled. Clear communication about contingency percentages, case expenses, and possible scenarios for recovery helps you decide whether to pursue a claim and ensures expectations about costs and net recovery are aligned from the outset.
Many premises liability matters settle before trial through negotiation or mediation once liability and damages are established. Settlement can provide a quicker resolution and avoid the uncertainty and time of a trial. Effective pretrial preparation and a persuasive demand package often lead insurers to offer fair settlements that address immediate and anticipated needs of the injured person. When settlement is not achievable, or when liability is strongly contested, litigation may be necessary to obtain fair compensation. Preparing for trial strengthens negotiation leverage and ensures that, if a case proceeds to court, it is presented in a compelling and organized manner to maximize the chance of a favorable outcome.
Timelines for resolving a premises liability claim vary depending on injury severity, complexity of liability, and the responsiveness of insurers and defendants. Simple claims with clear liability may resolve in a few months, while cases involving serious injuries, disputed fault, or multiple defendants can take a year or longer to reach settlement or trial. The pace of obtaining medical records, completing discovery, and scheduling court appearances also affects the timeline. Staying proactive with documentation and cooperating with investigations helps move a claim forward. Regular communication about case status and realistic expectations for timing are part of managing a claim through negotiation or litigation, and early strategic steps often reduce overall time to resolution.
The most important evidence typically includes photographs and video of the hazard and scene, witness statements, incident reports from property staff or security, and medical records that link treatment to the injury. Maintenance logs, inspection records, and prior complaint documentation can show notice and a pattern of unsafe conditions. Together, these items form the factual foundation for proving liability and calculating damages. Preserving these elements promptly increases their probative value and prevents disputes about their authenticity or availability. When necessary, formal legal tools can be used to obtain additional records from property owners or third parties to complete the evidentiary picture supporting your claim.
Yes. Landlords can be held responsible for injuries on rental property when they fail to maintain safe premises or neglect repairs that create hazardous conditions. Responsibilities can include maintaining common areas, stairs, railings, and fixtures. Local building codes and lease terms may also affect obligations, and landlords who are notified of hazards and fail to act can be held accountable when injuries occur. Documenting maintenance requests, repair timelines, and communications with the landlord helps establish whether adequate steps were taken to address hazards. In Arroyo Grande cases, showing that a landlord knew of the danger and did not remedy it supports a claim for compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other associated damages.
