If you were injured by a defective product in Aptos, California, it’s important to understand your rights and options. Product liability claims can involve dangerous household items, automotive parts, medical devices, or consumer electronics. A successful claim often depends on identifying the defect, proving how it caused your injuries, and establishing who is responsible. At Law Republic APC we represent people harmed by unsafe products and help them gather evidence, work with technical consultants, and pursue compensation for medical bills, lost wages, and pain and suffering. We aim to provide clear guidance tailored to local laws and the needs of Aptos residents.
Navigating a product liability matter in Santa Cruz County requires careful attention to deadlines, documentation, and legal theories that may apply. Whether a defect stems from manufacturing, design, or failure to warn, each case needs a methodical approach to build a persuasive claim. We help clients understand available remedies, including settlement and litigation paths, while advocating for fair recovery. Our communications include regular updates so you can make informed decisions about next steps. Contacting a law firm early can protect evidence, preserve important records, and strengthen the overall case during the crucial early stages.
Product liability representation helps injured consumers obtain compensation and hold manufacturers and distributors accountable. Skilled representation focuses on identifying the defect type, locating responsible parties along the supply chain, and securing the engineering and medical evidence necessary for a claim. For Aptos residents, working with a firm familiar with California product safety law and local courts ensures responsive service and targeted legal strategy. Beyond financial recovery, a well-handled claim can prompt safer practices by manufacturers and reduce the risk that other consumers will suffer similar harm. Representation also provides support through negotiation and litigation, reducing the stress of managing complex legal and technical issues alone.
Law Republic APC serves clients in Aptos and across Santa Cruz County in personal injury matters, including product liability claims. Our approach emphasizes thorough investigation, careful preservation of evidence, and collaboration with independent engineers and medical professionals when needed. We prioritize clear communication with clients about possible outcomes, timelines, and costs. Our attorneys are experienced in negotiating with manufacturers’ insurers as well as litigating in state court when necessary. We maintain a client-centered practice that focuses on documenting damages and building a persuasive case to achieve meaningful results for people harmed by defective products.
Product liability claims in California generally rest on three common theories: manufacturing defect, design defect, and failure to warn. A manufacturing defect arises when a product departs from its intended design and becomes dangerous, while a design defect involves an unreasonably dangerous design even when properly manufactured. Failure to warn concerns inadequate instructions or safety warnings that would help consumers avoid foreseeable risks. Navigating these theories requires collecting proof such as the defective item, manufacturing records, safety reports, and expert analysis to show causation and fault in a way that complies with California law.
Proving a product liability claim also involves documenting the nature and extent of injuries and related losses, including medical treatment, rehabilitation, lost income, and other economic and non-economic harms. Evidence can include medical records, photographs, accident reports, eyewitness statements, and communications with the manufacturer or seller. Timely action to preserve the defective product and relevant paperwork strengthens a claim. In Aptos, local counsel can help coordinate inspections, arrange for testing when needed, and manage interactions with insurers and opposing counsel to pursue full and fair compensation for affected consumers.
A defective product is one that poses an unreasonable risk of harm when used as intended or in a reasonably foreseeable way. California recognizes different categories of defects, and the legal theory applied will shape the proof required. Manufacturing defects are shown by demonstrating the product deviated from its intended design. Design defects require proof that the design itself was unreasonably dangerous, often using risk-versus-utility or consumer-expectation standards. Failure-to-warn claims focus on whether the manufacturer provided adequate instructions and warnings about risks. Each claim demands careful factual development to connect the product’s defect to the consumer’s injuries.
A product liability case typically requires linking a defect to the injury, identifying responsible parties, documenting damages, and meeting procedural deadlines. The investigation process often begins with preserving the product and obtaining medical records and photographs of injuries and the scene. Next steps include interviewing witnesses, securing maintenance and purchase documents, and reviewing safety recalls or incident reports. When technical questions arise, independent testing and engineering evaluation can clarify how a defect occurred. The firm then crafts a claim strategy—whether to negotiate a settlement or file suit—to pursue financial recovery tailored to the client’s circumstances and goals.
This glossary explains common terms used in product liability claims so you can better understand the legal process. Definitions cover concepts like causation, negligence, strict liability, discovery, and damages. Knowing these terms helps clients follow legal advice, evaluate settlement offers, and participate in strategic decisions. We define each term in plain language and show how it relates to an Aptos case, such as how strict liability can apply even without proof of negligence, or how discovery allows parties to obtain documents and testimony critical to proving a defect. Clear terminology reduces confusion and empowers clients throughout the claims process.
Strict liability is a legal theory that can make a manufacturer or seller responsible for harm caused by a defective product regardless of fault in design or manufacturing. Under strict liability, the injured party must show the product was defective and the defect caused the injury while the product was used as intended or in a foreseeable way. This theory can simplify proof because it does not require showing the defendant was negligent, though causation and defect still must be established with evidence such as testing, photographs, and expert analysis when appropriate.
Failure to warn occurs when a product lacks adequate instructions or safety warnings about foreseeable risks associated with normal or foreseeable misuse. A successful claim requires demonstrating the absence or inadequacy of warnings made the product unreasonably dangerous and that a different warning would have reduced the risk of harm. Evidence may include industry standards, label history, consumer expectations, and medical testimony. In Aptos cases, careful review of packaging, manuals, and marketing materials helps determine whether proper warnings were provided to consumers.
A design defect claim asserts that the product’s design itself is inherently unsafe even when manufactured correctly. Proving a design defect usually involves demonstrating that the product’s dangers outweigh its benefits or that it fails to meet reasonable consumer safety expectations. Analysis often relies on engineering comparisons, alternative design proposals, and industry norms to show a safer feasible alternative was available. Plaintiffs may use testing data, expert reports, and injury reconstruction to support the conclusion that the design caused the harm.
Causation requires showing the defect directly led to the injuries suffered, which can involve medical testimony, accident reconstruction, and product testing to link the harm to the defect. Damages refer to the losses for which recovery is sought, including medical costs, lost wages, future care needs, rehabilitation, and non-economic damages like pain and suffering. Accurate documentation of expenses and credible expert opinions about prognosis and future needs strengthen claims for appropriate compensation in litigation or settlement negotiations in Aptos and Santa Cruz County courts.
When pursuing a product liability matter, clients can choose approaches that vary in scope from targeted, limited actions to broad, comprehensive representation. A limited approach might focus on resolving a single claim quickly, negotiating with an insurer, or obtaining a narrow remedy for immediate medical expenses. A comprehensive approach builds a full case record, pursues all responsible parties, and prepares for trial if necessary to maximize recovery. The choice depends on the severity of injuries, complexity of causation, the number of defendants, and long-term needs, and an informed discussion helps clients decide which path best meets their goals.
A limited approach can make sense when injuries are relatively minor, liability is clear, and the responsible party offers a reasonable settlement that covers documented medical bills and time away from work. In such cases, clients may prefer a focused negotiation to resolve matters quickly without protracted litigation. This approach typically involves collecting pertinent records, presenting a demand to the insurer, and closing the matter once fair compensation is obtained. It minimizes time and legal exposure while addressing immediate financial needs related to the injury sustained from the defective product.
A limited strategy may also be suitable when the evidence of defect and causation is straightforward and the claim involves a single seller or manufacturer with clear responsibility. When product origin, purchase records, and eyewitness accounts point to a single source of liability, focused negotiations may secure a fair resolution without broad discovery or expert involvement. Clients should weigh whether the compensation matches their full losses and whether they are comfortable closing the matter, because settling early can limit the ability to pursue additional claims later if new injuries or complications arise.
Complex product liability cases often involve multiple potential defendants, such as component manufacturers, assemblers, and distributors, and require deep investigation to trace responsibility. A comprehensive approach includes robust discovery, expert engineering and medical analysis, and strategic litigation planning to hold all accountable parties responsible. This thorough process can reveal hidden causes, manufacturing deviations, or supply chain decisions that increase liability. For residents of Aptos facing serious injuries, a full legal evaluation helps ensure all possible avenues for recovery are pursued rather than accepting an early partial settlement.
When injuries are severe or will require ongoing medical care, a comprehensive strategy helps document present and future needs to secure adequate compensation. This approach typically includes economic analysis of future care costs, vocational assessments for lost earning capacity, and medical forecasting from treating providers. Comprehensive representation ensures that settlement demands reflect long-term consequences and that negotiations or trial strategy are built around securing funds for future rehabilitation, adaptive equipment, or necessary home modifications, so victims in Aptos are not left facing uncovered expenses later.
Adopting a comprehensive approach to product liability can increase the likelihood of full recovery by seeking compensation for all present and future losses, identifying all responsible parties, and building a thorough evidentiary record. It provides leverage in negotiations, improves credibility at trial, and reduces the risk of missing key claims or defenses. For Aptos residents, comprehensive representation also means coordinated communication with medical providers and technical consultants, which strengthens the causal link between the defect and the injury while helping clients navigate the legal process with steady support.
Another benefit is the protection of client interests during long-term recovery. Comprehensive representation considers future medical needs, potential complications, and ongoing economic impacts, aiming to secure compensation that addresses these concerns. It also preserves the option to pursue punitive damages when appropriate and ensures discovery is thorough, preventing defendants from hiding documents or shifting blame. Ultimately, a comprehensive strategy seeks durable outcomes that allow injured people to focus on healing while their legal team handles the complexities of pursuing full financial recovery.
A comprehensive approach invests in the technical and medical evidence needed to prove a defect and link it to injuries. This often includes independent testing of the product, engineering reconstructions, and medical expert opinions that document the nature and extent of harm. These elements are particularly important when defendants contest causation or point to user misuse. By building a robust factual record, clients in Aptos increase the chances of achieving fair compensation through settlement or verdict, and they place themselves in a stronger position during negotiations with manufacturers’ insurers.
Comprehensive representation ensures that both immediate and long-term losses are assessed, documented, and pursued. Claims can account for ongoing medical treatment, future surgeries, rehabilitation, lost earning capacity, and diminished quality of life. Economic and vocational evaluations help quantify future losses so settlement demands or jury presentations reflect realistic needs. This thorough approach reduces the chance that a client will accept an early offer that fails to cover future expenses, helping residents of Aptos secure compensation that addresses their complete recovery and long-term financial security.
If a product causes injury, preserve the item and avoid discarding or repairing it. Take clear photographs of the product, the injury, and the surrounding scene, and keep packaging, receipts, and instruction manuals. Record contact details of witnesses and write down what happened while memories are fresh. Preserving physical and documentary evidence supports testing and analysis that can demonstrate a defect. These early steps are critical in creating a factual record that strengthens your claim and helps identify the responsible manufacturer or distributor during investigation and potential litigation.
When insurers contact you, be cautious about providing recorded statements or signing releases without legal guidance. Early communications can affect your rights and may be used to minimize payouts. Consider consulting a firm to evaluate offers and advise on appropriate responses so you do not inadvertently compromise your claim. Legal representation can manage negotiations, request necessary documentation from manufacturers, and ensure settlement proposals reflect the totality of your losses, including future care and non-economic damages, rather than accepting a quick but insufficient payment.
If you were harmed by a defective product, representation can help you navigate California law, preserve crucial evidence, and pursue compensation for medical expenses, lost income, and pain and suffering. A legal advocate can coordinate technical testing, identify all potentially responsible parties, and develop a negotiation or litigation strategy designed to secure fair recovery. For people in Aptos, working with counsel familiar with local courts and medical resources ensures responsive service and a focused plan that addresses both immediate needs and longer-term financial impacts of an injury caused by a dangerous product.
Representation also helps protect clients from early settlement offers that do not account for future needs or hidden losses. Attorneys can seek comprehensive documentation of current and anticipated expenses and push for compensation that covers rehabilitation, adaptation, and reduced earning capacity when relevant. Additionally, pursuing a claim can prompt corrective action by manufacturers and suppliers, reducing the chance of similar injuries to others. For residents of Santa Cruz County and Aptos, choosing experienced counsel means having a legal partner to manage the complexities of product liability while you focus on recovery.
Typical cases involve injuries from consumer electronics, automotive parts, medical devices, power tools, or household products that malfunction or lack proper warnings. Incidents may occur at home, on the road, or at work, and can include catastrophic harm or less severe but still significant injuries. In many instances, defective components or manufacturing errors are the root cause, while other cases result from inadequate design or labeling. Recognizing these circumstances early and preserving evidence helps determine whether a product liability claim is appropriate and which legal theories apply under California law.
In Aptos and Santa Cruz County, injuries from defective auto parts such as brakes, airbags, or tires can result in severe consequences. These cases often require forensic analysis of the part, maintenance records, and accident reconstruction to establish that a product failure, rather than operator error, caused the collision or injury. Gathering thorough documentation, including photographs of the vehicle, repair histories, and police reports, supports a stronger claim. In cases involving vehicle defects, manufacturers and parts suppliers may share responsibility, and pursuing claims can involve complex supply-chain investigation and technical testimony.
Consumer electronics and household appliances can cause injury through overheating, fires, explosions, or electrical malfunctions. Such incidents require preservation of the device and its packaging, along with receipts and warranties, to trace manufacturing batches or design components. Technical testing by independent labs can reveal whether a defect existed, and evidence of prior complaints or recalls may strengthen the claim. When injuries arise from consumer products, timely preservation and reporting can help determine whether a manufacturing flaw, design problem, or failure to warn led to harm and whether the manufacturer may be liable for damages.
Claims involving medical devices or pharmaceuticals require detailed medical records, treatment summaries, and often consultation with medical experts to show how a product caused injury or adverse effects. These matters can be legally and technically complex, involving regulatory records and clinical data. For Aptos residents harmed by medical products, careful coordination with treating physicians and timely preservation of implant components or medication packaging is essential. These steps support claims against manufacturers or distributors when the product’s design, manufacturing, or labeling contributed to the patient’s harm.
If you or a loved one suffered an injury from a defective product, Law Republic APC is available to discuss your situation and advise on next steps. We offer a careful review of the facts and initial guidance on preserving evidence and documenting injuries. Our goal is to help clients understand their legal options, timelines for claims under California law, and potential avenues for compensation. Contacting our office early helps preserve important materials and gives your claim the best chance for a successful outcome while you focus on recovery and medical care.
Law Republic APC represents clients in personal injury matters including product liability, with attention to detail, responsive communication, and strategic case development. We prioritize thorough investigation to document defects and their link to injuries, and we collaborate with technical and medical professionals when necessary. For Aptos residents, we strive to provide practical legal counsel tailored to local circumstances and to pursue fair compensation for medical costs, lost income, and other damages. Our commitment is to treat each client with respect and to manage the legal process efficiently on their behalf.
We work to protect clients from premature offers and to ensure settlement proposals reflect both present needs and future care requirements. Our approach includes negotiating with insurers and, when needed, litigating complex claims in Santa Cruz County courts. We keep clients informed at every stage and explain the reasoning behind strategic choices. Our objective is to secure results that allow injured people to focus on healing while we handle the legal work necessary to pursue full and fair recovery for losses related to a defective product.
Contacting our office in a timely manner helps preserve evidence and supports a stronger claim. We provide an initial case review to evaluate potential theories of liability, advise on document and product preservation, and outline the likely steps in pursuing compensation. We handle communications with manufacturers and insurers and coordinate with experts to document causation and damages. Our goal is to achieve meaningful recovery for clients in Aptos who have suffered avoidable harm due to unsafe or defective products.
Our process begins with a thorough intake and review of the incident, focusing on evidence preservation, medical documentation, and an initial legal assessment. We then investigate the product, collect records, and consult with technical and medical professionals as needed. After developing a case strategy, we pursue negotiations with responsible parties and their insurers, and we prepare for litigation if a fair settlement cannot be reached. Throughout the process we provide regular updates, explain options, and work to achieve results that address both immediate and long-term needs of injured clients in Aptos.
Early actions include preserving the defective product, securing photographs and witness statements, and obtaining prompt medical care. We advise clients about what materials to keep, how to document injuries, and what timelines may apply for initiating a claim. Collecting receipts, warranties, and packaging can help trace the product’s origin and manufacturing batch. These initial steps form the foundation for effective investigation and are critical for ensuring evidence is available for testing and review during later stages of the claim.
Recording the details of the incident and maintaining complete medical records are essential. This includes emergency room reports, follow-up visits, diagnostic tests, and ongoing treatment notes. We guide clients on how to obtain records and organize documentation to support a claim for damages, and we work with medical providers to obtain necessary opinions regarding causation and prognosis. Clear, contemporaneous records strengthen the connection between the defective product and the injuries claimed.
Preserving the actual product, packaging, receipts, and any related accessories is vital for forensic analysis. If disposal or repair has already occurred, notify the firm so we can advise on steps to reconstruct the item’s condition through available records and photographs. Early preservation enables independent testing and helps prevent the destruction or alteration of evidence. We coordinate inspections and testing where needed to document defects and trace manufacturing or design origins.
The investigative stage involves obtaining manufacturing records, warranty documentation, and any incident reports or complaints related to the product. We may retain engineering and testing professionals to evaluate whether the product deviated from design or performance specifications. Medical professionals help establish causation and quantify injuries, while economic specialists can assess future financial impact. This comprehensive fact-gathering phase builds the evidentiary foundation needed for settlement negotiations or litigation in Aptos and throughout Santa Cruz County.
Technical testing can confirm whether a product failed due to a manufacturing error, design defect, or improper warning. Independent engineers conduct examinations and produce reports that explain the cause of failure in technical terms accessible to attorneys and juries. These reports often play a central role in establishing liability and can influence settlement negotiations and trial strategy. We coordinate testing and interpret results to present a clear case for why the product was unsafe and who should be held responsible for resulting harm.
Medical opinions help link the injury to the product and forecast future care needs, while economic analysis quantifies past and future lost income and other financial losses. Together these evaluations allow us to calculate a realistic demand for compensation and support that demand with credible expert testimony. This combination is important when negotiating with insurers or presenting a case at trial, as it illustrates the full scope of the client’s losses and the compensation required to address both medical and economic consequences.
After investigation and expert analysis, we pursue negotiation with manufacturers and insurers to seek a fair settlement. If negotiations fail to produce adequate compensation, we prepare for litigation, which includes formal discovery, depositions, and trial preparation. Throughout litigation, we continue to assess settlement opportunities and advise clients on the best course of action based on case developments. Our aim is to secure compensation that covers medical costs, lost earnings, and non-economic damages while advancing the client’s goals and protecting their interests in court when necessary.
Negotiation involves presenting a well-documented demand supported by technical and medical evidence to persuade defendants or their insurers to offer fair compensation. We use expert reports, medical records, and economic evaluations to justify settlement amounts and to counter defenses raised by opposing parties. Throughout negotiations we keep clients informed about offers and the likely outcomes if the case proceeds to trial so they can make reasoned decisions about accepting a settlement or moving forward with litigation.
When litigation is necessary, we prepare thoroughly for court by taking depositions, exchanging evidence in discovery, and developing persuasive trial presentations with expert testimony. Preparation includes rehearsing witness testimony, creating demonstrative exhibits, and crafting legal arguments that tie technical proof to liability and damages. Our goal in trial preparation is to present a clear, compelling narrative that helps jurors or judges understand the defect, its consequences, and the compensation appropriate for the injured party.
Manufacturing defects, design defects, and failure to warn are the most common types of defects that can give rise to liability. A manufacturing defect occurs when a product departs from its intended design and becomes dangerous during production. A design defect exists when the product’s design itself creates an unreasonable risk of harm, even if manufactured as intended. Failure-to-warn claims arise when the product lacks sufficient instructions or warnings about foreseeable risks and safe use. Each theory requires tailored evidence to show the defect caused the injury. To prove a claim, evidence typically includes the defective product, photographs, medical records, receipts, and, when necessary, technical testing and expert analysis. Independent engineering or lab testing can demonstrate how a product failed, while medical records link the defect to injuries. These elements together build the factual basis needed to pursue compensation through negotiation or litigation under California law.
In California, the statute of limitations for most personal injury claims, including product liability, is generally two years from the date of injury for negligence-based claims, but there are exceptions and other limitations that may apply depending on the theory and circumstances. For claims based on strict liability or latent injuries, the timeline can vary based on when the injury was discovered or should reasonably have been discovered. It’s important to consult a firm promptly to ensure all applicable deadlines are identified and met. Delays in taking action can result in lost evidence or forfeited rights, so contacting legal counsel early helps preserve claims and prevents unintended waiver of remedies. We can assess the specific facts of your case, advise on relevant statutes and tolling rules, and work quickly to protect your legal options while gathering key evidence for a strong claim.
Liability may still exist when a product is used in a way not strictly intended by the manufacturer, provided the use was reasonably foreseeable. Manufacturers are expected to anticipate common misuses and include appropriate warnings or design safeguards. If the misuse was unforeseeable or extremely unusual, liability may be reduced, but many everyday misuses fall within the scope of foreseeable conduct. Evaluating foreseeability often requires a factual analysis of how consumers typically interact with the product. Evidence such as user manuals, industry standards, and history of similar incidents can help determine whether the manufacturer should have anticipated the way the product was used. Courts examine the nature of the misuse and whether a different warning or design would have prevented the harm when deciding on liability, so careful investigation is important in each case.
Compensation in a product liability case can include economic damages such as medical expenses, past and future lost wages, rehabilitation costs, and other measurable financial losses. Non-economic damages can cover pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life. In certain cases involving particularly reckless conduct by a manufacturer, punitive damages may be available to punish and deter egregious behavior, though these require a high legal standard to prove. Accurately calculating damages often requires input from medical and economic professionals to estimate future care needs and lost earning capacity. Presenting a credible damages case supported by documentation and expert analysis strengthens settlement negotiations and trial presentations aimed at achieving fair compensation for the injured party.
Yes. Preserving the defective product and any packaging, instruction manuals, or receipts is critically important for testing and tracing the origin of the defect. If the item has been discarded or repaired, notify your legal representative immediately so alternative steps can be taken, such as collecting photographs, maintenance records, or witness testimony that might reconstruct the item’s condition. Early preservation increases the likelihood that independent testing can determine how and why the failure occurred. If possible, store the product in a safe place and avoid tampering with it. Proper preservation helps prevent disputes about alteration or misuse and provides key physical evidence that can be examined by engineers and labs when building a strong case against manufacturers or other responsible parties.
Many product liability cases resolve through settlement negotiations, but some require litigation to achieve appropriate results, especially when liability is contested or the damages are substantial. Settlement is often preferred for its speed and predictability, but going to trial may be necessary when defendants refuse to offer fair compensation. Each case is unique, and the best path depends on the strength of evidence, the number of defendants, and the client’s objectives. Our process involves preparing each case as if it will go to trial while actively exploring settlement opportunities. This ensures we maintain leverage in negotiations and are ready to proceed to court if a defendant’s offer does not reflect the client’s full losses and needs. Clients are kept informed so they can make decisions about settlement offers or trial.
California law can impose liability on manufacturers, distributors, and sellers depending on the relationship to the defective product and how the product reached the consumer. Manufacturers are often the primary target, but distributors and retailers can also be responsible in certain circumstances. The allocation of liability depends on the facts of the case, such as whether a component manufacturer or assembler contributed to the defect, and whether the seller knew of the danger and failed to act. Investigating the supply chain and contractual relationships helps identify all parties that may share responsibility, which is particularly important in complex cases involving components from multiple sources. Pursuing all potentially liable parties increases the likelihood of full recovery for injured plaintiffs in Aptos and beyond.
A product recall can support a claim by demonstrating that the manufacturer identified a safety issue, but a recall is not required to prove liability. Evidence of a recall or similar complaints can strengthen a case by showing a pattern of dangerous performance or awareness of risk. However, the absence of a recall does not preclude liability if the product was defective or lacked adequate warnings at the time of injury. If a recall exists, it can be useful for establishing notice and industry recognition of a defect, and it may provide documents and records that are helpful in litigation. Legal counsel can obtain recall-related materials and use them to support claims against responsible parties.
You can pursue claims against manufacturers or distributors located outside California or overseas, though jurisdictional and service issues can add complexity. International defendants may still be subject to suit in California if they do business here, placed the product into the U.S. stream of commerce, or otherwise had sufficient contacts with the state. Serving foreign entities may require following international protocols and additional procedural steps. Our firm evaluates jurisdictional issues early and coordinates with counsel experienced in handling cross-border matters when necessary. We gather evidence tying the product to the defendant and pursue the most effective forum for recovery while addressing the additional logistical and legal challenges that can accompany international defendants.
Our firm manages communications with insurers and manufacturers to protect client interests and avoid missteps that could undermine a claim. We handle settlement negotiations, respond to discovery requests, and coordinate production of documents while shielding clients from direct pressure or inappropriate statements that insurers may use to minimize payouts. This centralized communication helps maintain a consistent strategy and prevent inadvertent waivers of rights or misstatements about injuries or the facts of the incident. We also review any settlement offers carefully to determine whether they fairly address current and future needs before advising clients whether to accept. When defendants refuse reasonable proposals, we prepare the case for litigation and continue negotiations from a position supported by thorough investigation and credible expert support.
